Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys..

On the F3 this morning, i had this scenario.. (3 lane highway section)

*Driving doing about 105 in the 90 zone, right hand lane (plenty of traffic, 05:45 am this morning)

*Two guys right up my arse - so i pull over into the middle lane to let them go

*Slowing down to about 99km - the two guys pass me doing about 110km..

*As they pass, one flash from the side of the road - i slam the brakes on, slow down to about 95km..

*Second flash as the other guy passes me..

The thing im wondering is this cop was in the far left section of the road - in the fog - without a sign (as far as i can tell, but cant testify to this) so as far as im concerned im between him and the two guys speeding past me..

SO - does the camera and flash reach across three highway lanes, or does it focus on only the closest two ? and if so, would the speed recorded be my own or the speed of the two clowns whizzing past me ?

Not sure which cars the camera would have picked up, but most police officers allow a 10% buffer. So depending on how the officer had his radar set up, if you were doing 99 and under when the flash went off, it was more than likely the two cars in the far right lane that were caught.

Just wait it out and see what comes in the mail.

yea not really sure - im just thinking that if my car was the only one to show up, it may be clocked at the speed the other guys were driving at...

is there anything about fog, line of sight, or rules/etc about operating speed cameras in obscured sitatuons ??

I know that you have to have the sign out when you are operating the speed camera - so if its foggy, wouldnt that be negated ?

The biggest problem with this is that your going to struggle to argue against it if they do happen to book you.

Margin wise - it's usually 10% which is in line with speedo accuracy.. however victoria has a much lower threshold than NSW.

As for which one they pick up.. not much you can do if you get the ticket.. unless you weren't speeding.. than it comes back to proving your innocent.

I doubt they would operate if they weren't able to book you - good luck though!!! hopefully you'll be right!

This has happened to me a bit. Although i have never been the one speeding.

I must be in about 5 photos from the camera on Carlingford road. Each time i write down the date/time/rego of other car/s. Just incase i can't remember what happened.

I haven't received any fines yet and some of these photos were from early last year.

Touch wood!!

I'm pretty sure that if the officer is wearing a full uniform standing infront of his marked police car/bike then they dont need a sign in NSW. Then again they dont take pictures if they have the 'gun' - they chase you down. They only need a sign when its an unmanned car with an automatic camera. Its a little blue swinging sign 20x60cm or so, placed on the ground about 10m from the car with the camera.

I'd go on the 10% rule - i've driven past the M5 tunnel ones at 88km/h with no fine...

id say your safe, if there is more than one object (car) of equal size in the picture im pretty sure they cant give you the fine because theres no way of determining which car it was as it sends out lots of beams.......if they do id be requesting the photo

some nice bit of doco 78vbsle ...ill be sure to keep it in mind..

If i do get done, ill definetely be asking for the photo..

fyi guys - he was in one of the white stationwagons...there couldve been a blue swingy sign saying camera in use...however with the extreme fog it wasnt visible..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...