Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i've been lookin at the dep rate of these cars for a while now. from what i can gather, they seem to lose around <5k a yr (base model). do u reckon its possible or safe to say that we'll see the 350z around the < 41k mark at the beginning of next yr (jan, 2006) ?

lowest price ive seen a 350z go for was $45000 and the the lowest price for a rx-8 was $39000.

just like our belovered R34 which had a price tag of 45-47k in 2003 and it dropped significantly in 2004.

maybe im dreaming, but anything is possible. i say this becoz i want a 350z bad but ive only got around 40k to spend.

what are your opinions ?

I reckon theres a big difference btw what pple are asking for and what pple are actually willing to pay.

So u may see someone asking for $XXX on the papers, but that dosent mean he will actually get it.

Its ridiculous to see a 60k car depreciate just 5k a year esp in the first few years. If u ask me, i would personally put it at 8-10k for the 1st year, and mebbe 6-8 for the following year.

Think abt it. If it was asking 65k brand new...and it actually just depreciates 5 k a year, would u pay 60 k for a 2nd hand one when u can put in 5 k more and get a brand new one? At that level where u are forking out 60k for a car....how significant would 5k be?

Dealer will bend you over.. they always do on a trade-in.

There is no solid rule of thumb.. Nissan sports seem to hold their value a lot better than your average commodore or worse still, falcon. Just have a look at the current price of an average S15 (200sx) of around 2001 to get a bit of an idea of where the prices will be in about 4-5 years.. They were on sale for $45k I remember new for a few years.

350Zs will start dropping in price, now that the "honeymoon" period for the flash new coupe are over. It doesn't help that there is a "newer" model that makes more power. Coupes are fashion cars, and so after their initial release, when everyone wants one, the price drops as people move on to the next car.

It happened to the Monaro. When they came out, they didn't depreciate at all (some people managed to sell them above list price a year after, with the waiting period) but now that you see the Aussie 2 door taxis everywhere they're back to depreciating again.

The 350Z is the same. When they came out, they were pretty uncommon on the road and there was a 3 month wait for them. Now that you can't turn around without seeing one, the prices will drop.

And we've seen from HSV resales what happens when you churn out a new model every year with a little more power. With the 35th Anniversary model out, regular Track models might drop in price too.

The S15 held its value well because of its publicity, and then being discontinued. After winning PCOTY every arriviste wanted one (along with people who wanted to drive a quick Aus-delivered coupe in the $40K price bracket, and your hektic bros wanting to be "different" from their WRX counterparts), and when Nissan stopped building them people who would have paid new-car price couldn't get one, and so buoyed the used car market value.

Just wait for the "new"- RX-7 to come out-

I think the prices for rx-8will drop even further- faster!

If we do evetually get the new Skyline you'll see the 350z drop quite a bit!

How long befor the R34 GTR's are under 50k- their getting close?

I reckon theres a big difference btw what pple are asking for and what pple are actually willing to pay.

So u may see someone asking for $XXX on the papers, but that dosent mean he will actually get it.

Its ridiculous to see a 60k car depreciate just 5k a year esp in the first few years. If u ask me, i would personally put it at 8-10k for the 1st year, and mebbe 6-8 for the following year.

Think abt it. If it was asking 65k brand new...and it actually just depreciates 5 k a year, would u pay 60 k for a 2nd hand one when u can put in 5 k more and get a brand new one? At that level where u are forking out 60k for a car....how significant would 5k be?

Things such as Vehicles depreciate on the reducing balance method.

For example:

Vehicle was purchased brand new for $60,000 and will be depreciated 15% RBM

1 year later: Vehicle has Depreciated $9000, Carrying Value: $51,000

2 years later: Carrying Value: $51,000, Depreciated (15% of Carrying Value): $7650 Current Value: $43,350

So in 2 years the Vehicle has an Accumulated Depreciation of $16,650

This works that the vehicle is depreciated more in its younger years and depreciated less in its older years.

Now if we did the same vehcile using the Straight Line Method were it is depreciated exactly the same ammount each year.

Vehicle was purcahsed brand new for $60,000 and will depreciate 15% SLM

1 year later: Vehicle has Depreciated $9000, Carrying Value: $51,000

2 years later: Carrying Value: $51,000, Depreciated $9000, Current Value: $42,000

So in 2 years the Vehicle has an Accumulated Depreciation of $18,000

Between the 2 methods there is a difference of $1,350, but if i were to continue in the years the difference would get much greater...

Aussie cars dont depreciate that much compaired to the ones overseas..............the 'drive em till they explode' culture prevents that. once the new car warrenties run out on them all and they need to be serviced they're price will fall quite a bit.........

Things such as Vehicles depreciate on the reducing balance method.  

For example:

Vehicle was purchased brand new for $60,000 and will be depreciated 15% RBM

1 year later: Vehicle has Depreciated $9000,     Carrying Value: $51,000

2 years later: Carrying Value: $51,000,  Depreciated (15% of Carrying Value): $7650   Current Value: $43,350

So in 2 years the Vehicle has an Accumulated Depreciation of $16,650

This works that the vehicle is depreciated more in its younger years and depreciated less in its older years.

Now if we did the same vehcile using the Straight Line Method were it is depreciated exactly the same ammount each year.

Vehicle was purcahsed brand new for $60,000 and will depreciate 15% SLM

1 year later: Vehicle has Depreciated $9000,   Carrying Value: $51,000

2 years later: Carrying Value: $51,000, Depreciated $9000, Current Value: $42,000

So in 2 years the Vehicle has an Accumulated Depreciation of $18,000

Between the 2 methods there is a difference of $1,350, but if i were to continue in the years the difference would get much greater...

Accounting gives me the shits, piss easy but OMG how boring. :chairshot

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...