Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

but for any kind of "quick" driving, on any surface, its better to have the chassis as rigid as possible.

strut braces help make the car more rigid. you said what i said, just in a different way.

however, this isnt always true.

example, looking back to the 97' season of F1, the cars with the "softest" chassis (being the poorer teams; Prost etc..) would always be in the last half of the grid, supporting your statement. however, when it would rain, the slower cars in the dry suddenly became competitive cause the chassis would flex enough to transfer weight to which ever wheels were under load, resulting in more "mechanical" grip. this theory isnt my own, i actually heard it from Martin Brundle during commentary of one of those particular races.

the basic pricipals are the same for road going cars as well, even though you dont see as much of difference as compared to F1.

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hmmm okay things have changed.

I went to my first drift meet on the weekend and loved it! I want to do it monthly. So this changes a few things. I am gonna keep this car for 6 months, but I am gonna consider over the next 6 months getting a more dedicated drifter, so I don't want to spend too much on this car. I may leave it for now, keep running semi-dodgy tyres so I'm not too concerned about the inner wear...

I havn't decided. But yeah. I will have to put more thought in before I spend the money.

nice 4dr 32 mate!

IMO if you want to drift your current car, this is what I would upgrade.

- Coilovers (with height adjustment - then you can raise it a bit, aim for around 1-1.5deg camber)

- Adjustable Castor Rods (Tension Rods) and run as much positive castor as you can (around 8 or 9 degrees is perfect for drift)

- Locked / 2-way mech diff

- Front & Rear Strut tower brace

- Alloy Subframe Spacers / Pineapples

- Tie Rods

- Rear upper camber arms

- Front Camber upper arms

- Hicas lock

most important is coilovers, castor rods, and diff. castor rods aren't vital, but with stock castor rods steering is very very vauge. You can try drifting on the viscous lsd for a while, but they are not very predictable - and i wouldn't bother if you're serious about drifting, you'll just do more damage hitting poles and stuff from diff crapping out mid-drift.

Coilovers will let you raise your car a little, unfortunantly skylines (unlike S13's) dont have mcpherson strut, and you can't use camber plates on suspension tops.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...