Jump to content
SAU Community

Help R34 Fuse Panel - Translation please!


Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

I've just picked up a 34 GTT and have no front wipers.

I can't see any blown fuses.

BUT, I have some fuses missing from the interior fuse panel.

Can someone please check this out this attachment (1 page PDF)?

Looking mainly for wiper fuse location, but if you're feeling energetic, I'm sure posting the full set will help out some of the ppl.

Thanks heaps!!

PEAR

Here's a sample of the 33 Fuse Panel - but I can't find anying on the 34.

------------------------------

SKYLINE R33 Fusebox

In Cabin Fuse box:

Left column, top to bottom

10A REAR WIPER

10A ANTI-STOP (ABS PERHAPS???????)

10A STARTER INDICATOR

10A ROOM LAMP

10A STOP LAMP

10A ELECTRICS

10A ENGINE CONTROL

10A HAZARD LAMP

15A FOG LAMP

10A TURN SIGNAL

10A METERS

10A ELECTRICS

Right column, top to bottom

10A SHIFT LOCK

10A A/T CONTROL

10A AIR CONDITIONER

10A ENGINE CONTROL

10A AIR BAG

20A BLOWER MOTOR

20A BLOWER MOTOR

10A AUDIO

15A CIGARETTE LIGHTER

20A FRONT WIPER

10A MIRROR CONTROL

20A REAR DEFOGGER

Ok, on the PDF, location #6 IGN 20A 'Front Wipers'.

It seems odd that they don't work... for an R32 or older it seems possible but an R34? I hope it's only a fuse thats the problem.

Ok, on the PDF, location #6 IGN 20A 'Front Wipers'.  

It seems odd that they don't work... for an R32 or older it seems possible but an R34? I hope it's only a fuse thats the problem.

Thanks!! yes, fingers x.

from memory, I think #6 was missing.... I hope,

I know some where missing (2 or 3), I list them, would you be able to translate them too?

Thanks again,

PEAR

--------------------------

Was a missing fuse - wipers are now working!! Thanks.

The 3 blank spaces lets look as though they are ok.

Rezz, thanks again!!

PEAR

Interesting! Where is the interior fuse box? I had a quick look the other day and couldn't spot anything :thumbsup: Also, can anyone give me an idea as to whether the cigarette lighter is listed there? :P

#23 ACC 15A 'Cigar Lighter'

  • 2 years later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...