Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Do it Nick!

Slightly lowered with a set of deep-dish rims really sets off the flared guards on them.

Throw on a pod and chunky exhaust, maybe some cams, and have it nicely tuned, and whatever you lose in lag and outright power on the GT-R, you can make up for in response.

  • Replies 123
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i just phoned jspec imports about one of these, he said for a 350gt premium which is 3.5 litre, it will cost 38k plus 4.5k compliance that for a 6speed manual, but he said you could get a 2.5 litre one cheaper but they dont have brembos and a few other options.

hey guys, we've been actively pushing more and more V35's because we wanna drum up interest in these great cars. Most people are put off by the non RB stature, but seriously if you get over that mental hurdle, the V35 package is very good. Better handling and performance than a Z33 (compare to V35 coupe) or the new Maxima (compare to V35 sedan). The compliancers we work with regularly also have expressed interest in them, and a couple of them are waiting on paperwork to confirm that they can start complying em, so things should get cracking very soon.

Everyday we add V35's to the aucution examples to give folks a realistic view of how much these cars sell for, start at and availability.

Here's today's picks:

http://www.j-spec.com.au/list/auction.php?...p?date=06/07/05

you can check out how much yesterday's ones sold for here:

http://www.j-spec.com.au/list/auction.php?...p?date=05/07/05

oh and check this out:

9388367_r.jpg

someone had to do it :rofl:

i just went to the company next door and they have one of these in there shed i must say i was in my element with about 5 r32 gtrs and a 350gt surrounding me ha ha.

But the company is called Shogun Carriers located in brisbane, they said they will be doing compliance for the 350gt within a few months they are still in the testing period.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...