Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

this might be a newbie thread but please bare with me. Just wondering how does a STOCK/ SLIGHTLY MOD GT-T compare with cars like S15s, STIs, GTSTs, rexs, SS, XR8s. Can anybody put them in order whereby a GT-T is more likely to win or lose to any of them in terms of 0-100km/h timings and 1/4 mile timings. S15s are fairly light cars, i reckon the S15 will be faster than the GT-T? correct me if i'm wrong please. Thanks!

Cheers!!! :sadam:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/79065-r34-gt-t-vs-others/
Share on other sites

Would think an STi would win the 0-100 dash

most would do it in around mid 6 seconds

GTT should beat an S15 -specially with a little tuning 1/4mile

& the WRX should get whipped

SS and XR8 may be a little slower down quarter...all depending on traction etc...

but they can be bloody quick too!

All around low-mid 14sec mark as far as i know. (STi prob high 13's)

The aussies would kick ass in torque figures obviouslly, but round a track

jappies would clean up. That's my thoughts anyway!

Easiest way to see is go to a site like www.svi.com.au and click the products screen and it gives u the 0-100, power and other details for common imports. Then compare that with manufacturer figures for WRX's, falcons and commos.

05 Man SS 1654kg @ 250kw = 6.616kg/kw

05 Man XR8 1740kg @ 260kw = 6.692kg/kw

GTT (manual coupe) 1410kg @ 206kw = 6.844kg/kw

05 STI Man 1475kg @ 195kw = 7.564kg/kw

S15 Man 1235kg @ 147kw = 8.401kg/kw

Factory kerb weights and power from redbook,motortraders

& carsales. Maybe STI > SS > XR8 > GTT > S15 using only numbers?

Spot on! Just checked in a Motor mag lying around:

1st place: STi 0-100km/hr: 5.74s 1/4mile: 13.82s

2nd place: SS 0-100km/hr: 5.82s 1/4mile: 13.99s

2nd place: XR8 0-100km/hr: 6.11s 1/4mile: 13.99s

4th place: WRX 0-100km/hr: 5.81s 1/4mile: 14.01s

5th place: 25 GTT 0-100km/hr: low 6's 1/4mile: ~14.2s

6th place: S15 0-100km/hr: ~6.9 s 1/4mile: ~14.8s

7th place: Magna VRX AWD 0-100km/hr: 8.60s 1/4mile: 16.49s

5th and 6th aren't in the mag, however S15

Spot on! Just checked in a Motor mag lying around:

1st place: STi 0-100km/hr: 5.74s 1/4mile: 13.82s

2nd place: SS 0-100km/hr: 5.82s 1/4mile: 13.99s

2nd place: XR8 0-100km/hr: 6.11s 1/4mile: 13.99s

4th place: WRX 0-100km/hr: 5.81s 1/4mile: 14.01s

5th place: 25 GTT 0-100km/hr: low 6's 1/4mile: ~14.2s

6th place: S15 0-100km/hr: ~6.9 s 1/4mile: ~14.8s

7th place: Magna VRX AWD 0-100km/hr: 8.60s 1/4mile: 16.49s

5th and 6th aren't in the mag, however times are pretty close to published figures somewhere in some mag. So what we came 5th! but for the price difference you could make them look like a Magna ;)

Erm...sorry guys to mention this but i meant JDM S15s...=P i think it's more like this

1st JDM S15 Spec R 0 - 100km/h = 5.52secs

2nd WRX STI Manual 0 - 100km/h = 5.74secs

3rd Holden SS Manual 0 - 100km/h = 5.83secs

4th 25GT-T R34 Manual 0 - 100km/h = 6.00secs

5th Ford XR 8 Manual 0 - 100km/h = 6.11secs

6th GTS25T R33 Manual 0 - 100km/h = 6.21secs

These are all stocks timings i reckon.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Bit of a pity we don't have good images of the back/front of the PCB ~ that said, I found a YT vid of a teardown to replace dicky clock switches, and got enough of a glimpse to realize this PCB is the front-end to a connected to what I'll call PCBA, and as such this is all digital on this PCB..ergo, battery voltage probably doesn't make an appearance here ; that is, I'd expect them to do something on PCBA wrt power conditioning for the adjustment/display/switch PCB.... ....given what's transpired..ie; some permutation of 12vdc on a 5vdc with or without correct polarity...would explain why the zener said "no" and exploded. The transistor Q5 (M33) is likely to be a digital switching transistor...that is, package has builtin bias resistors to ensure it saturates as soon as base threshold voltage is reached (minimal rise/fall time)....and wrt the question 'what else could've fried?' ....well, I know there's an MCU on this board (display, I/O at a guess), and you hope they isolated it from this scenario...I got my crayons out, it looks a bit like this...   ...not a lot to see, or rather, everything you'd like to see disappears down a via to the other side...base drive for the transistor comes from somewhere else, what this transistor is switching is somewhere else...but the zener circuit is exclusive to all this ~ it's providing a set voltage (current limited by the 1K3 resistor R19)...and disappears somewhere else down the via I marked V out ; if the errant voltage 'jumped' the diode in the millisecond before it exploded, whatever that V out via feeds may have seen a spike... ....I'll just imagine that Q5 was switched off at the time, thus no damage should've been done....but whatever that zener feeds has to be checked... HTH
    • I think Fitmit had some, have a look on there (theyre Australian as well)
    • Hah, fair enough! But if you learn with this one you can drive any other OEM manual. No modern luxury features like auto rev-matching or hillstart assist to give you a false sense of confidence. And a heavy car with not that much torque so it stalls easily. 
    • Actually, I'd say all three are the automatic option. Just the different trim levels. The manual would be RSFS, no? 
×
×
  • Create New...