Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

++++

Greetings All.

It also depeds on what type of vehicle you are trying tp build...Streeter...Dayly Driver/Weekend Warrior...Track demon, but still docile enough for street driving...

Also what do you expect from your turbo?? Put your fut down at ANY RPM and be pushed back into the seat...or an on/off style power delivery...?

Cheers,

--Tonba

++++

108rwkw with 3inch cat back and a FMIC?

that sounds pretty 5hit house man

my ageing 88 model redtop rb20 made 116rwkw with 3inch exhaust and pod. the rest was stock

i was at the understanding that most silvertops will making that much (110-118rwkw) in bog stock trim.

have u had your compression checkd on your engine?

Matt

Yer the car was a bit sick it was the tune when i got 108rwkw after i had it tuned i put a pod and BOV on i guess it all helps a little we got 138rwkw with standard standard everything else which i thought was good. Then the standard turbo sh8t it self hense why i have done all this work to the car. Well i drive the car every day so i guess i wouldn't wont to much for power i guess but you know what they say a person that has power always wants more hehehe. I don't mind the turbo coming on late although i wouldn't mind it coming on about 3500 instead of the 4200, the guy that gave me the turbo says that it has the smallest exhuast housing on it which if i am not mistaken helps boost earily not sure guys

your next step maybe should be porting of the head, and some cams ~$2k or so.

Signs point to that turbo not being a full '650hp' turbo - but hey.. why bother with internals when you can squeeze a bit more out, and keep going until you have reason to bother with internals.

You might get another 10-30rwkw (~235rwkw), which might be the real level of that turbo. Thats a good amount of power from a RB20det.

thanks guys this is helping a far bit and giving me a lot of options. The guy that tuned my car at rank rotory said the same thing about the fuel pumps they told me that i should be able to get maybe another 10 - 20% out of it as i will be able to turn the fuel presure up a little. I really am trying to get to that 250rwkw mark not sure if i will get there what will i need to get into the 12's for the 1/4 mile i am going next month to see what can get with what i have now.

++++

Greetings All.

Some things you might want to consider before cracking open the block for a rebuild...

  • Port & Polished Head
  • Adjustable Cam Gears
  • Extrude Honed Exhaust Manafold
  • Larger TB with a Z32 Airflow Meter (Better for tuning)

But before you do any of these a GTR fuel pump might be the go...

My 2c,

--Tonba

++++

Some things you might want to consider before cracking open the block for a rebuild...
  • Port & Polished Head

 

That would involve removing the head, so new head gasket, plus labour etc. Much nicer solution would be to just throw some cams in. The cost of remove and install head, head gasket, porting and polishing etc would be a lot more...and drama being that the std cams could be the limiter, more then the ports when std????

++++
  • Extrude Honed Exhaust Manafold

 

If he is still running the std manifold with a 45mm external wastegate...then id say dont bother extrude honing it, again the cost in labour to remove and install plus extrude honing would be better spent on getting a good quality / deisng manifold. But im assuming since he is already running the external gate he has the manifold side of things sorted.

 
  • Larger TB with a Z32 Airflow Meter (Better for tuning)

 

 

He is running a Wolf 3D so would be amazed if he was still running an AFM...though the larger TB could be an interesting thing to try because i have often wondered what if any is to be gained.

And sorry not meaning to be picky, but i wouldnt even go for a GTR fuel pump, for the same money or even less you can get a Bosch 040 which is new and flows more and is easy to fit....just another opinion:)

i was thinking of buying a walbro i can get one of here from happypig i think he goes by for $165 would this be ok. I am not running a AFM i just have a 3" piping from the pod. What would i be looking at in gaining with a set of cams in terms of rwkw and cost involed in this sort of operation

hey guys it seems that my car isn't running on the 16psi i thought it was it turns out that it is on;t running on about 12 as i founf out last night well thats all my boost gauge would go up to would this be correct in making this sort of power with this boost. I thought they tuned it to 16 but it turns out they didn't they said they would turn it up to 16 with a bigger fuel pump i guess then i will get my extra 30 - 40 rwkw

i say run it on another dyno 729NM doesnt sound right with that kw figure

other than that get some new cam gears (mayb a step bigger cams), extrude hone what ever you can afford to (even you turbo if you want) and most definetly upgrade your fuel pump man. Probally a good idea to get the Z32 afm too.

The most important step however is giving your car a good tune!!

i have had a few people say that to me about the 729nm i am going to get the fuel pump and tune again then run it on 2 different dyno's see what the difference is, i am not running a AFM i am running wolf 3D so i have taken it of and put all new 3" piping in

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...