Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hahah this is funny,

I've spent about 10 mins trying to think of something to say.....but words fail me. I'd be very interested to see a commodore that you could make as efficient, powerful and handle as well as a skyline on the same budget.

Plus theres always the undeniable fact that skylines look oh so much better!!

EDIT: Just realised he's 21 and lives in Perth. I wish i didn't waste my time replying now, he's got no hope

well if you want to get back on topic you said your belief was

The reason why, is that my beleif has always been that holdens will get the same performance, for a lower price when compared to a jap car.

ive challenged you to find me a holden that has greater performance than my car in ONE aspect, acceleration, deceleration, or handling for the same price, and so far youve been unable to come up with the goods

stop being an ignorant internet troll, your wasting all our time with your idiocy

holdens are inferior, and unless you present some evidence your comments are not worth anyones time

like i said guys, i'll prove you wrong, when i prove you wrong. Until then, back to the original subject please. I've gone as far as i'm willing to with the side-conversations so i'm stating now that this will be my last post on these forums if you can't keep your opinions to yourselves. I asked a simple question and i want a simple answer. Thank you =]

like i said guys, i'll prove you wrong, when i prove you wrong. Until then, back to the original subject please. I've gone as far as i'm willing to with the side-conversations so i'm stating now that this will be my last post on these forums if you can't keep your opinions to yourselves. I asked a simple question and i want a simple answer. Thank you =]

I thought you were a know all , how came you don't know that ? Like you know the tare weight of a stock HQ V8 ,1800 kg ? Street legal and running under 8 seconds 1/4 mile ?

With a stock n/a 308 to top it all off . You want people to take you serious ?

What a wanker ?

I can tell the fastest thing you have driven would be a stock HQ Holden capable of 18 second 1/4 mile downhill with a tail wind .

....

I'm not even going to bother with the ****ing morons in these forums anymore -.-

I NEVER SAID IT WAS A STOCK 308 PULLING 8s FOOL!

God damn, i've never met anyone so retarded -.-

Goodbye all :cheers:

You are the only retarded moron here . You probably can't even drive .

Hey all,

I'm new to the forums, linked here by a mate who was trying to prove that there are skylines that'll do under 8s. The reason why, is i told him i know of a certain HQ that also does under 8s. Now for you un-enlightened in the Holden area of car ownership, a HQ is a very early tank-like model of kingswood, and you can definately expect them to weigh more than a skyline, or even the latest commodore.  

They weight 1800 KG and for all their weight and the fact that it's using a decades old 308 engine, i wanted to know how that compares to this day + ages brand new technology. Now that i know that some skylines are in fact done up to be 8s or better cars, the thing i want to know about now, is cost. The reason why, is that my beleif has always been that holdens will get the same performance, for a lower price when compared to a jap car. Not that i don't like jap cars, to be perfectly honest the 300zx fairlady z is one of my favourites... more because of the attraction than the performance lol. However, i am a proud australian, and i'm sick of hearing jap car lovers bag the crap out of my beloved holdens, which i know can already can quite easily keep up with most modded cars out these days.  

So can you all do me a big favour, especially enthusiasts like FORCEFED RB26DETT, and post a little information please? I don't need specs, just a rough price range, and what speeds you pull down the 1/4 would be great thx :cheers:

Hey, I just read your message and would be happy to send you a video of the GTR doing a 7.95 at 181mph (292km/h), just show me where to send it and it's yours.

I like the 308 in the VP idea. Holdens had 304's from VL until the LS1 and General Motors had control (and ownership) of Holden for many years before the LS1 was introduced.

You don't even know your own cars.

I would have thought you could afford an interstate phone call by the age of 21. Have you got a job yet?

I think you are a wanker sir. Post 25 was probably your orgasm and post 27 kleenex time.

I like the 308 in the VP idea.  Holdens had 304's from VL until the LS1 and General Motors had control (and ownership) of Holden for many years before the LS1 was introduced.

You don't even know your own cars.

I would have thought you could afford an interstate phone call by the age of 21.  Have you got a job yet?

I think you are a wanker sir.  Post 25 was probably your orgasm and post 27 kleenex time.

OWNED :matrix:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...