Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Snippeet for Sydney Kid's post

------ ---- OD ---- RWKW ---- RWKW ---- BHP ------ BHP

No of AFM's ---- ------- 1 -------- 2 -------- 1 -------- 2

RB26 ------ 65 ------ 149 ------ 299 ------ 271 ------ 474

RB20/25 --- 80 ------ 226 ------ 453 ------ 376 ------ 683

Z32 ------- 80 ------ 255 ------ 511 ------ 415 ------ 763

Q45 ------- 90 ------ 302 ------ 605 ------ 479 ------ 890

http://sau.com.au/forums/showthread.php?mo...=hybrid&t=53284

Theres the thread

Cheers

Sumo

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/82284-z32-afm/#findComment-1492297
Share on other sites

Im making 202 RWKW but was consider the z32 AFM as my series 2 r33 afm is maxying out @ 5volts according to the PFC hand controller

Anybody know if there will be a performance benefit upgrading to the z32 or any benefit what so ever???

R33 GTST Mods include: Full turbo back exhaust, 13psi boost, front mounted intercooler, exhaust cam gear, pfc, stock turbo, pod in box with CAI.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/82284-z32-afm/#findComment-1492948
Share on other sites

mines the same as mr_g im maxing out at 5100 on series 2 with pfc and usual mods

you wont gain any power moving to a z32 i dont think its just hard to tune around if your car say reads 5volts max from like 4000rpm onwards orsomething crazy like that if its just a momentary spike then it should be ok

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/82284-z32-afm/#findComment-1493673
Share on other sites

maxing out and really maxing out are two different things im pretty sure. maxing out is where u momentarily just hit 5100 volts for a few seconds like full boost and going to redline you may max it out at 5600rpm for 1/2 a second whereas normally its just under. and "maxing it out" is like being on 5volts from 4500rpm onwards to redline, i think thats what r31nismoid meant by you shouldnt be "maxing it out"

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/82284-z32-afm/#findComment-1493675
Share on other sites

i thought my afm (s2 rb25) was maxxing out too early, so assumed the afm was stuffed, it would max out at about 6500 in second gear with 10psi, and a lot less power than some others with afms that were not maxxing out.

i swapped it and tried it out today, the afm i swapped it with gives out the exact same readings as my original one. i dont know if both are stuffed or thats just how they are.

with the stock ecu at 10psi the afm must have been reading high as it went into r&r mode at about 4500rpm. i know of other cars with same mods as mine but stock ecu that dont go into r&r at 10psi at all.

so im not sure, afm or something else?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/82284-z32-afm/#findComment-1493681
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...