Jump to content
SAU Community

street sprints


sir31
 Share

Recommended Posts

sir r31, do you have any contact details? Its possible i will enter this year.

I went to last years street sprints, had a great time. Huge variety of cars (EVERYTHING) and some good stacks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will be getting some info and some entry forms in the mail in the next couple of days I will post when I have them the event Is on at the Historical Village in Gatton on 15th and 16th Febuary.

Could be a lot of fun

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest BigRod33

slip, you really should go as an entrant

street sprints have your name written allover 'em

the best ones though are out at Leyburn

rod

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jay wrote this in events thread:

Scrutineering is on the Fri 1pm to 10pm. If reqired can be done on Sat by appointment only.

You will need

Cams licence minimum level 2S,and current drivers licence

Cams -affiliated car club membership card

Registered vehicles need CTPI insurance extension valid for

this event

All apparel including helmet and approved shoes, non flamable

neck to ankle/wrist....total ban on nylon or similar material

All pit crew must attend scrutineering

registered cars need minimum lap sash seat belts

fire extinguisher securly fitted

Double throttle springs

Road legal tyres ( tubeless tyres must be fitted to optimum

size rims eg Stock 6.5ins mags must have 205 tyres)

blue triangle for battery location, white comp no, 100mm high

top left of windscreen (supplied by you)

Noise level 95dBA measured at 30m from track edge at any

time

so whats the go there???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You're confusing two different responders and more than one issue. The stock Neo ECU boost sensor is used by the ECU for protection purposes. It is essentially only an overboost sensor. It is not used for determining engine load for fuelling or ignition purposes. That task falls solely to the AFM. Any aftermarket ECU that either has an onboard MAP sensor or a plug in one, will use the MAP sensor as the primary load sensor. Or I should perhaps say "can", rather than "will", because some of them have the option of using other primary load sensors. That MAP sensor is not for the same function as the stock Neo boost sensor. The reason I recommended against a plug and play ECU is that they are intended to run a particular engine and usually in the car that the particular engine came in. So, if you have a transplanted engine in a different car, with some parts of the original missing (such as the boost sensor, for example) and therefore likely non-standardness of the loom and its insertion into the car's loom, then it is very likely that you will run into the same problems with needing to fix up wiring to make it work that you would with the stock ECU. And, if doing so for the stock ECU is enough of an obstacle that you start considering a standalone plugin as a solution, it should become clear that the plugin is quite possibly not the solution you'd hope it to be. It would just lead to more of the same type of problem solving work to get it going. In the above paragraph and in my earlier post, the lack of the boost sensor is not critical. It was just used as an example of something that we knew you did not have right, such that the stock ECU would not work. I took that as an indicator of a reasonable probability that there were other related problems hiding there.
    • I can think of two places in my city of <1.5million population that specialise in automotive instrument repairs.Unless you're out in the wilds of Quebec, you have 3 major Canadian and 3 major US cities within the same distance as the single nearest city to mine. Surely there is somewhere you could send it.
    • I never cared for twins but whenever these conversations came up, I always presumed the higher number represented a larger turbo. Learn something new everyday. 
    • Interesting, I've never seen a failure like that before but with the age of these cars and the general questionable-ness of all kinds of parts these days you can't rule anything out I suppose. Boost leak testing the boost control system would've revealed this though.
    • Thanks for updating the outcome; while anywhere in the system could leak, I hadn't heard of a wastegate actuator doing so before, can add that to the list of potentials for next time
×
×
  • Create New...