Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Personlly I would suggest finding a turbo specialist and discuss with them what your requirements, in terms of performance, are. They should be able to custom make a turbo to any specs you want.

There are alot of bad t3/t4 turbo's , so do some shopping around.

See'ya:burnout:

  • Replies 109
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

To be honest most of the rb20 housings (EXH) will be cracked, all the ones I have seen have been so sourcing another one is better. The turbo for Lukes car cost around the $1800 mark but we did source a number of parts and this did include a new oil feed and machined manifold

  • 1 month later...

Hi snOOp, our RB25DET gets 260 rwkw, it has....

GCG hi flowed RB25DET turbo (at 1.3 bar)

Tomei cams 256 degrees (inlet works with VVT)

Jun adjustable exhaust pulley

Cat back HKS exhaust

Split pulse dump

HKS intercooler and pipework

Power FC

Z32 AFM

Jamex panel filter in standard box

Custom fabricated aluminium inlet from AFM to turbo

Did 12.5 for 1/4 at Willowbank just before Xmas in a full weight, manual R34 GTt.

Hope that helps

Hi guys, I am surprised by the lack of use of simple mathematics sometimes, particularly when talking about turbo spool up.

It is pretty simple really, say we pick 3 common RB engines with the same turbo and assume the same engine efficiency. The capacity is the main thing that determines the rpm at which the engine develops boost. The following table assumes the same compression ratio and efficiency in all 3 engines.........

Engine CC's Boost RPM

RB20DET 1,998 3,600

RB25DET 2,476 2,900

RB30DET 2,964 1,950

Simply put, an RB25DET is 24% bigger in capacity than a RB20DET. Therefore it will produce the same amount of exhaust, spin the turbo and develop boost 24% lower in the rev range. Ditto an RB30DET is 48% bigger in capacity than a RB20DET. Therefore it will develop boost 48% lower in the rev range.

If you want to allow for compression ratio, a good rule of thumb is to simply factor in the difference in compression ratio eg; if in the above example the RB20DET had a 8.5 to 1 compression ratio and the RB25DET had a 9.0 to 1 compression ratio, the RB25DET would have boost at 2,750 rpm (instead of 2,900 rpm).

This is not perfect, but it is a good rule of thumb and in the real world is pretty close to the mark.

Another rule of thumb we use is a performance engine should not develop boost until at least 1/3 of the available RPM is used. Otherwise the turbo is too small.

So if we assume that our 3 X RB engines above all rev to 7,500 rpm, then 1/3 is 2,500 rpm. So the turbo would be too small if used on the RB30DET as it develops boost at 1,950 rpm. It could be said that the turbo is too big for an RB20DET as it develops boost at 3,600 rpm (a long way from 2,500 rpm). At 2,900 rpm (or 2,750 rpm with 9.0 to 1 compression ratio), the RB25DET would seem to be a pretty good fit for this turbo.

Hope that makes sense

  • 2 months later...

cam great results as always aren't you getting the turbo bug again :(

good to see you back one the forums great result for for the set up I'm considering a simialr one for my cefiro I have injectors and z32 afm so we will see.

btw all you people saying rb 20 are tough I have popped 2 in the last 18 months cant be thart tough bu tstill a good motor :)

cheers

meggala

Having said that the RB20 is a strong engine, the SR20 is also just as strong if not stronger. Has anyone read of that white JUN s15 tuned here in Australia that has put out a stupid 600 or more horsepower at the wheels!?? Of course it runs a 2.2L stroker kit with TRUST T88...but still, that thing will go :rolleyes:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GCG is a good company, they're a major distributor for Garrett in Japan as well.
    • Nah, OEM washer bottle and brake fluid reservoirs are fine I don't know what it is with the plastic that Mazda used, some plastics, like the washer bottle and brake fluid res are fine, and still look new after 20 years use, where as the coolant expansion tank, and PS reservoir, that I replaced with new OEM items when I first got the car, turned yellow and started getting brittle a few years later If the dirty yellow stained plastics didn't trigger me there wouldn't be an issue, but they did, much like the battery bracket....... Meh As for going back to work full time to support car stuff, nope, why, because I own a Mazda NC MX5, not a Nissan R series Skyline 🤣
    • I've never heard of CJ-motor, so can't advise you on them. I'd just go straight to GCG for a GCG highflow though. Seems no point to use a middleman. I'm somewhat surprised that the price on the CJ site is lower than the GCG retail price. Even though CJ would get a discount of some sort, you would hardly expect them to give up so much margin. Maybe the price is out of date? Having said that "I'd go to GCG"...when I did my highflow, I went to Hypergear. I did this https://hypergearturbos.com/product/rb25dethighflow/#tab-dyno-results with the R34 OP6 450HP profile. With the BB centre (extra $400) and intially with the standard boost actuator, but I eventually got him to send me the high pressure one when I got to the point of being able to actually use it. Ends up costing the same sort of money as the GCG highflow, but this is, of course, the turbo that I KNOW has a shorter length core and so moves the comp cover rearwards. The GCG apparently doesn't do that. My mechanic also swears by the GCG highflow, given that we have another turbo rebuilder who does something essentialy the same as theirs, using Garrett wheels. He says it stands up at really low revs and makes good power. I haven't pushed my HG highflow past ~240-250rwkW yet (should have a little more in it, but unclear how much) and it does have a fairly gentle boost ramp. OK, it's much better now that I have gotten my boost controller tuned up on it.  A lot of my earlier unhappiness was because I couldn't keep the wastegate flap as closed as it needed to be (including some mechanical issues). I'd still prefer it to boost up nearly as quickly as the stocker, and it certainly a bit slower than that. So maybe the GCG one is worth the first look (for you).
    • Ok thanks 🙂 I will higly consider this. Any "known" company for a good reviews and experience to send that off? Is that CJ-motor good one? Or go straight to GCG site? I need to use VPN to even find some of those "shops" let alone access them 🙂 
    • You can literally put in as much WMI as it takes to quench the combustion totally (and then back it off a little, obviously), and it will keep making more and more power. The power comes from the cooling effect of the water (and the meth) and the extra fuel (the meth, which also has massive octane). It is effectively exactly like running E85. One might be slightly better than the other, but they are damn close. But with either you can lean on the boost or the timing (or both) waaaay more than with just petrol and the results are similar. Here's the first thing I googled for an anecdotal bit of evidence. Can't access the attachment without being a gold member, but it is there for the getting if able to, or searched up elsewise perhaps. https://www.hpacademy.com/forum/general-tuning-discussion/show/wmi-vs-e85/
×
×
  • Create New...