Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My g-tech times ..... 12.2 0-400m and 4.0 0-100 (did this twice)

Drag strip times ..... 11.9 0-400m (did this twice)

The g-tech times were done on a road surface with much less grip than the wsid surface, so i think the g-tech is fairly acurate.

Car is R32 GTR.

Some mods include:

PFC

R34 N1 Turbos

Twin plate clutch

Tim.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/83441-g-tech-pro/#findComment-1509428
Share on other sites

Just brought a G-tech off e-bay and test my car it could manage 0-100 in 4.9 and 0-400m in 13.4. Who else has one of these? how acurate have you found it compared to the drag strip ect? Whats results did you get? (please include mods)

cheers

GTechs are quite repeatable and hence, if set up correctly, accurate.

Some things to consider:

The GTech will make a correction to your start time/reaction time when logging quarter mile times. It does this also for 0 - 100 runs. Check up in the manual to see how it works. If you remove the correction the 0 - 100 times will be more accurate.

If the rpm's are calculated correctly you can cross check the timing from the acceleromter with the engine revs. All you need to do is work out how many revs in second/third gear equates to 100km/h.

Best bet to help you understand what is going on is to export the data as a csv file & plot it yourself.

Lastly, set it up as level as possible & then make sure you do a calibration run.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/83441-g-tech-pro/#findComment-1509597
Share on other sites

Just brought a G-tech off e-bay and test my car it could manage 0-100 in 4.9 and 0-400m in 13.4. Who else has one of these? how acurate have you found it compared to the drag strip ect? Whats results did you get? (please include mods)

cheers

Thanks guys. I seem to have a high MPH around 109 -110 does that sound about right for the times I am getting.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/83441-g-tech-pro/#findComment-1509653
Share on other sites

As far as I know, mph readings on a g-tech are the speed that you are doing at the end of the 400m, where as on a drag strip I think it is an average speed between a certain point on the strip (not sure where exactly, but close to the end) and the finish line. So the mph will be a bit higher on the g-tech.

Tim.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/83441-g-tech-pro/#findComment-1509840
Share on other sites

Just brought a G-tech off e-bay and test my car it could manage 0-100 in 4.9 and 0-400m in 13.4. Who else has one of these? how acurate have you found it compared to the drag strip ect? Whats results did you get? (please include mods)

cheers

Thats really really interesting, I used a Passport GTimer before and after my S-AFC (which when I got, I tuned to ~10.5psi as well). Before hand I ran a 14.0 @ 101mph (0-60mph in about 5.6s) and backed that up at the dragstrip with a 14.1 @ 103mph... poor track condition the day I raced. The GTimer btw, seems to try and give a trap speed more indicative of the strip.... I used to have a GTech, and that would give on average 4mph higher trap speeds than were realistic in my experience.

After I got the car tuned, I ran 4.9s 0-60mph and 1/4 in 13.4 @106mph on the GTimer.... and my car dynod at 190rwkw on a local dyno. As much as anything

I just thought it was quite cool how close all the results were.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/83441-g-tech-pro/#findComment-1513819
Share on other sites

Had another couple of goes last night managed 13.3's this time @ 112.8 and 111.5 MPH (im slowly getting better). My car was tuned @ 195rwkw since then ive added r32 actuator so it now holds 11psi to redline where as it used to trail off to 9psi with the bleeder. I have also added a partitioned apexi pod and a cold air feed. Would be interesting to see what its makes on a dyno now after those small changes. It is certainly very inerseting to see how similar our results are.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/83441-g-tech-pro/#findComment-1514526
Share on other sites

Had another couple of goes last night managed 13.3's this time @ 112.8 and 111.5 MPH (im slowly getting better). My car was tuned @ 195rwkw since then ive added r32 actuator so it now holds 11psi to redline where as it used to trail off to 9psi with the bleeder. I have also added a partitioned apexi pod and a cold air feed. Would be interesting to see what its makes on a dyno now after those small changes. It is certainly very inerseting to see how similar our results are.

Munna,

Best thing about the later model GTech's is the ability to download the runs from the GTech to you computer. You can then analyse the runs & work out how to go quicker, eg launch better, change gear at certain rpm etc etc.

Do you have any files? If you want to post 'em I'm sure people would be interested.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/83441-g-tech-pro/#findComment-1514993
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even more fun, leave all the ADAS stuff plugged in, but in different locations, hopefully avoid any codes!   And honestly, all these new cars with their weird electronics. Pull all the electronics out Duncan, and just shove an aftermarket ECU and if needed a trans controller in, along with a PDM. Make it run basic but race car styled!
    • To follow up a question from earlier too since I had the front bar off again (fking!) This is what is between the bumper and the drivers side wheel And this is the navigator side, only one thing but its a biggy! So basically....no putting coolers in the wheel arches without a lot of moving other stuff. Assuming I move to properly race prepping this car I'll take that job on and see how the computers respond to removing a whole bunch of ADAS modules
    • So I prepped the car for another track day on Wednesday (will be interesting to see coolant temps post flushing out and the larger reservoir, with a forecast of 3-14 being 20o cooler than last time I took it out). Couple of things to mention; since I am just driving the car and not taking a support vehicle, I took the rear seats out and just loaded the back up Team Trackday style. Look at all that space! To cover off removing the rear seat....it is weird (note the hybrid is probably different because it wouldn't have folding rear seats) Basically, you remove the lower seat base, very similar to a r series but it is a clip that pulls forward to release the base rather than it being bolted down. Easy Then, you need to remove the side section of the rear seat on each side. There is a 14mm head nut at the bottom of the side piece, the it slides upwards off a hook at the top to release; you also need to unhook the seatbelt from the loop at the top. Then the centre piece is weird. You need to release/fold the seats forward with the tab in the boot on each side From there, there are 2,x12mm headed bolts holding the rear of each seat to the folding bracket, under the trim between the rear seat and the boot (4x christmas tree clips there, they suck). The seat is out but you can see where the bolts attach to the bracket
    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
×
×
  • Create New...