Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

can anyone tell me the offset that would fit flush with the 33 guards

front 18x8.5

rear 18x9.5

been reading this topic but just cant find it, always slightly in or out

+30

Hi, I need some advice on fitment.

Would it take a lot of work to fit something like F: 18x9.5 + 30 R:18x10 +30 to a 33 GTST?

Have Tein superstreets fitted.

Thanks for any help/advice you can give

will require guards rolled and slightly flared if the car is low. front liners will have to be removed.

the fronts will sit out 5mm less than this: (bearing in mind that i pulled the guards to exactly where i wanted them)

med_gallery_36777_3194_311819.jpg

the rears will sit out 1mm more than this: (bearing in mind that i pulled the guards to exactly where i wanted them)

med_gallery_36777_3194_2166627.jpg

Hi, I need some advice on fitment.

Would it take a lot of work to fit something like F: 18x9.5 + 30 R:18x10 +30 to a 33 GTST?

Have Tein superstreets fitted.

Thanks for any help/advice you can give

yes should be fairly ok, front might be slightly mexican but a good roll should fix that. back will be fairly easy with a roll only needed and maybe a 235 or 245 tyre depending how low your car is.

yes should be fairly ok, front might be slightly mexican but a good roll should fix that. back will be fairly easy with a roll only needed and maybe a 235 or 245 tyre depending how low your car is.

-

all gonna come down to car height on this one... i run fairly low, (320mm rear and 325) front so flaring was req'd with 235's and this is pretty much exactly the same

-

all gonna come down to car height on this one... i run fairly low, (320mm rear and 325) front so flaring was req'd with 235's and this is pretty much exactly the same

im sorry i dont follow 320mm what? off the ground?

30three- dont forget camber..

i've gone the less width way and more offset for the set i'm getting for my 33

they are 17x8 +5 on front and 17x9 +11 on rears.

currently they have 205/45r17s on front and 225/45r17 on rears. will see how they sit on stock guards with slightly lowered suspension but i'm thinking 215's atleast for front.

will update with picture i nthe next week ro so.

should be fine, maybe a little conservative if your going for flush look i think a few people are running 10" +22 but im not up with r34 fitment.

Think he means centre of wheel to guard. forgive my n00bness i dont know what that means still haha..

Hi guys,

I'm looking at some Tri spoke rims for my r33 gts-t. They're being sold without tyres. Basically, these are the specs:

17x9 20+ fronts

17x9 35+ rears

I know little about offset etc, but will these wheels suit my 33? Please bear in mind that the car is lowered slightly, but I do with to go lower down the track with coilovers etc.

well u'd want the higher offset rims on the fronts if anything and +35 9" wheels might scrubs on the inside if your low so test fit them first. 17x9 +20 should fit on the rears fine if you run a thin 235 or a 225 tyre.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...