Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just wondering, the relay in the bonnet for the "4wd" is that the one that essentially controls the transfer of the power to the front wheels?

I dont want to pull the fuse to dyno/burnouts or anything, i just prefer a car with more bias to the rear. I dont always want to be 2wd, 4wd is handy. I understand that there will always be residual pressure in the front wheels, but, if i am just using the car normal street driving with the relay pulled, would that damage my central diff?

Another question, and i know this might sound stupid, but what is involved in permenently making my stagea 2wd? Meaning, is it difficult to totally remove the front drive line/central diff?

If i do cut power to the front, via the relay, will have help remove understeer under power when going around corners?

Thanks for any help.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/84959-pulling-the-fuse-to-make-rwd/
Share on other sites

it has been mentioned previously on here before i believe that the stagea like the r33 and r34 gtr have a slightly different awd system to the r32 gtr which does allow you to go into rwd but the others do not do this.

feel free to correct me if i am wrong

if you want more bias to the rear there is something that you can buy i dont know the name of it but sk or others will know its name that allows you to vary the torque from front to rear allowing you to have more power to the rears.

hope this helps

I know exactly what your talking about.

What i know of is that people pull the fuse for a few reasons. Burnouts, dyno runs etc. Things where the front wheels dont move at all.

I dont want to do things like that, i still want to drive around normally with the front wheels spinning, just no/miniumal power to them. The way i see it, there should be no wear on the central diff.

As for the controller, i know of it. TS Dancer its called, but it still doesnt transfer 0:100.

I was thinking that pulling the relay would be a cheaper way to get close to 5:95, but i just want to know if anyone KNOWS it will damage the car in any way?

Not sure if Stagea is the same as a 33GTR, but a member in Vic pulled the fuse and didn't disconnect the front shaft, resulting in a stuffed transfer case. Still worked but he stated that it felt worn/sluggish afterwards, he obviously wasn't a happy man. This was done about 18 (if not more) months ago, it never was the same, so he just got it reco'ed recently.

Let's atart off with some facts. Stageas don't understeer because they are 4wd. They understeer because Nissan designed the suspension system so that they would understeer, it's good for the Wallys.

The first job is to add some caster to the front, they don't have anywhere near enough. That fixes around 50% of the understeer. Then add some more rear anti roll, the rear stabiliser bar is too small by a lot. I added ~50% more anti roll to the front (24mm solid adjustable front stabiliser bar) and ~300% to the rear (24mm solid adjustable rear stabiliser bar).

Bingo, no more understeer.

Moving on to 4wd, all ATTESSA systems since 1994 have held residual hydraulic pressure on the clutch pack (there is no centre differential). Pulling the fuse or the relay simply stops the hydraulic pump from working. As long as you are not doing burnouts, dyno runs or drifting, this is not a problem for short periods of time. But the hydrailic fluid is not circulating (no pump remember) so the oil in the transfer case gets hotter and finally overheats. All of the components (clutch plates and intermediate plates) are still turning, they are still connected to the wheels and to the gearbox output shaft. So there is accelerated wear due to the extreme temperature.

You can buy an ATTESA controller (Duncan has them), which (even on 100% rear drive setting) still lets the hydraulic pump run and hence circulates the oil. But don't expect it to cure the understeer.

:D cheers :D

i was just going thru the service manual for something else but i came across this it states there are 2 methods to change the drive mode to 2wd.

1. remove air evacuation connector, and depress teh brake pedal 5times within 10 seconds after placing the ignition switch to ON position. At the same time the 4WD warning lamp will flash in the meter panel (twice in a second) to indicate it is in 2WD mode. To return the vehicle drive mode to 4WD, place the ignition switch to OFF position and connect air evacuation connector.

2. remove front propellar shaft.

page 20 of the manual...

Edited by muck

The first methoud works well cause I tested it when I had my Stagea up on a hoist. I've posted pics and a how too somewhere, it was a while ago now though..

But when I had the car on the dyno I got them to pull the front shaft out just to be on the safe side. The last thing you want is a $3000 bill to replace the clutch packs :D

Yeah I had that thread bookmarked but with this new change to invision it doesnt work, but Jay has a great howto for doing this, which also explains that it should not be done for long periods of time.

I personally would love to be able to do this when I take my beast out on some skidpans, but is not worth the potential damage it might do.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...