Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I recently drove my friend's R32 gtst which has coilovers and a roll cage but is otherwise stock. It sits perfectly flat through corners without absolutley no body roll. I want this handling.

I'm currently running bilstein shocks with Apexi springs (which are a progressive rate spring). I've also have ARC swaybars and front and rear strut braces. Judging by pushing down on the corners of each car, my suspension is pretty much as stiff as his.

My issue is that when I put the car into a corner (on a racetrack of course), I initially get a small amount of body roll before the suspension stiffens up, which I find a bit unsettling. It makes it hard to judge where the car's limit is.

Do you think this is caused by:

a) lack of roll cage; or

b.) progressive rate springs; or

c) all of the above; or

d) other... please explain.

My current theory is that the "soft" coils of the springs are initially being compressed as I enter the corner, allowing the small amount of body roll, before load is placed onto the "harder" coils - will a linear rate springs be much of an improvement?

Cheers,

Greg

Edited by Greg
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/85664-spot-the-difference-handling/
Share on other sites

Rather then thinking about body roll etc, throw the same rubber on each car and look at corner speed. What feels quick isnt always, and sitting perfectly flat may not be the quickest way thru a corner?!?!?!

This is just conjecture but a darty pointy car with firm suspension could feel great and resposnive, but when you load the thing up through a quick corner with undulations like most australian roads and tracks for that matter, you may find the actual corner speed is down a little.

Then again it could be a lot higher...guess im just saying dont let the seat of the pants deceive you .

And it comes back to driver comfort as well, nand how you liek th ecar to feel. Im starting to lean towards liking a slightyl firmer setup then what i currently have, though odds are i wont be able to ride kerbs etc meaning that i will be wanting to make up a lot of time elsewhere, because at the moment my cars ability to really ride kerbs means i am able to make time on soem quicker cars then me.

I've found from riding in peoples cars with roll cages it adds much more of a firm feel. But as Roy said what feels doesn't always mean faster (lap times). Are all your other stiffening bits the same? (struts/sway bars/bushes etc?)

Could it be your wheel/tyre setup too? (i.e. lower profile tyres on your mates car?) There have been a few people around that complain about having the tyre compress before their suspension does (when they have hard suspension but high profile tyres).

As Roy posted, the feel is irrelevant, it's how much grip it has that determines how fast it is. Generally speaking a softer spring rate gives more grip. That said, we don't use progressive rate springs in the race cars. We do use tender/helper springs to keep the main coils trapped.

I have never seen progressive front springs in a Skyline, it is quite common in the rear though. But mostly to soak up the travel in the shock. The progression is there to keep the coil trapped, not to have an initial softer spring rate.

You should check this before you jump to the conclusion that it is the progressive rate that is causing the initial vagueness. Firstly check that you actually have progressive springs in the front (unlikely). Then have a look under the car (on ramps with the weight on the wheels) and see if there are any of the progressive coils not sitting on top of one another. That will tell you if there is in fact any progression at all in the dynamic spring rate.

:huh: cheers :)

The roll cage will also add weight...

And the other thing, potentially your subconsous could make you think you can go round coners safer because you have a cage around you, like, even if you come off, you wont die kinda thing, strange how the mind works.

Thanks for the replies everyone :)

I am going purely off the in seat feel, not corner speed. In some ways the feel is more important to me as my car rarely sees the track.

The tyres I'm running are 205/60/15 so there is a distinct possibility that the sidewalls are flexing before the suspension. I'll borrow some lower profile rubber to test this theory.

My front springs are definitely progressive. I will check if any of the progressive coils aren't touching each other tomorrow in the light. Thanks for your help :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I've been reading a lot lately about unsprung weight and how beneficial it can be to reduce it for driving on the track, given my semi's only have another day or two in them I am throwing around the idea of some lighter wheels and a square set up. I have 265/35/19's and 245/40(?)/19 Federal 595's at the moment. The wheels and tyres are super heavy. I looked up my wheel weight online and got 14.5kg naked. Not sure if this was 8.5 (front) or 9 (rear) but that's a lot. I have also been reading about the benefits of a square setup. Much better rotation and potentially less understeer.  When I throw these together I'm thinking about a 17x9 or 18x9 square (preferably under 10kgs per wheel) with 245 or 255's. I can get some cheap 17x8.5 BMW M Sport wheels, they weight 10.5 kg's each but at 8.5 wide could probably only get 245's on them? I know they come with 255's from factory but semi's are a bit chunkier. Otherwise it will be aftermarket wheels in a 9" width. Most of the other BMW wheels are heavy unless you pay a squillion dollars for some M wheels.  Although, the E46 M3 Style 67's could be good but I'd have to buy 2 sets to square them up.  My car has a tickle over 400hp and about to put an LSD in also, is 245 a little thin for a square setup? It kinda feels that way to me. Also, is there any tangible benefit to having 18's over 17's? Is the footprint demonstrably bigger? From those of you who went to light(er) wheels after heavy buggers, did you notice it much?
    • Start with the R32 GTR wiring diagram. The ECU is essentially the same, so the pinouts are good. The details around ECCS relays, etc might differ a little bit, but the reality is that you need to get ignition power to kick the ECU so it powers up the ECCS relay which brings the rest of the ECU up. This also gives power to the other circuits that are needed to make the engine run, like the ignition coils, etc. All of this is visible on the R32 diagram and should give you a strong guide, even if it's not quite the same as the R33. As to specifics - I'm pretty sure no-one can help you from afar, as there is no way to know what mistake or omission has been made in connecting stuff up. It always turns out to be "LOL, I shorted something and an entire wire vanished out of the loom", or "We never connected X or Y main connector", or "shit, you mean I need to have that fuse installed?".
    • hello wanted some insight on what my problem could be so i swapped a RB26DETT into my r33 gtst used a R33 GTR engine harness and im using a haltech platinum pro. The car cranks but no start the ecu isn’t getting any power now im trying to find out why i cant seem to find any schematics  or diagram for the engine harness for the r33 gtr anything helps thank you.
    • hahahaa @GTSBoy that is my last resort. Like use a cardboard and cut it using the indicator as a reference. But I was winging my luck to see anyone had a spare bumper because drawing the outline off the hole is always easier and less chance of mucking it up
    • Admittedly in that screenshot its doing about 13psi but later on in the log theres definitely spikes to 16. What is missing though is the massive peak, then a big drop and then a recovery. While it does go a little higher than I would like on base pressure, I think it's reasonably safe to assume that boost control via the mac valve should be a lot easier to control from here on out. I wasn't game to hook up the mac valve today as it's very wet and it's on the verge of fighting traction as it is.
×
×
  • Create New...