Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I recently drove my friend's R32 gtst which has coilovers and a roll cage but is otherwise stock. It sits perfectly flat through corners without absolutley no body roll. I want this handling.

I'm currently running bilstein shocks with Apexi springs (which are a progressive rate spring). I've also have ARC swaybars and front and rear strut braces. Judging by pushing down on the corners of each car, my suspension is pretty much as stiff as his.

My issue is that when I put the car into a corner (on a racetrack of course), I initially get a small amount of body roll before the suspension stiffens up, which I find a bit unsettling. It makes it hard to judge where the car's limit is.

Do you think this is caused by:

a) lack of roll cage; or

b.) progressive rate springs; or

c) all of the above; or

d) other... please explain.

My current theory is that the "soft" coils of the springs are initially being compressed as I enter the corner, allowing the small amount of body roll, before load is placed onto the "harder" coils - will a linear rate springs be much of an improvement?

Cheers,

Greg

Edited by Greg
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/85664-spot-the-difference-handling/
Share on other sites

Rather then thinking about body roll etc, throw the same rubber on each car and look at corner speed. What feels quick isnt always, and sitting perfectly flat may not be the quickest way thru a corner?!?!?!

This is just conjecture but a darty pointy car with firm suspension could feel great and resposnive, but when you load the thing up through a quick corner with undulations like most australian roads and tracks for that matter, you may find the actual corner speed is down a little.

Then again it could be a lot higher...guess im just saying dont let the seat of the pants deceive you .

And it comes back to driver comfort as well, nand how you liek th ecar to feel. Im starting to lean towards liking a slightyl firmer setup then what i currently have, though odds are i wont be able to ride kerbs etc meaning that i will be wanting to make up a lot of time elsewhere, because at the moment my cars ability to really ride kerbs means i am able to make time on soem quicker cars then me.

I've found from riding in peoples cars with roll cages it adds much more of a firm feel. But as Roy said what feels doesn't always mean faster (lap times). Are all your other stiffening bits the same? (struts/sway bars/bushes etc?)

Could it be your wheel/tyre setup too? (i.e. lower profile tyres on your mates car?) There have been a few people around that complain about having the tyre compress before their suspension does (when they have hard suspension but high profile tyres).

As Roy posted, the feel is irrelevant, it's how much grip it has that determines how fast it is. Generally speaking a softer spring rate gives more grip. That said, we don't use progressive rate springs in the race cars. We do use tender/helper springs to keep the main coils trapped.

I have never seen progressive front springs in a Skyline, it is quite common in the rear though. But mostly to soak up the travel in the shock. The progression is there to keep the coil trapped, not to have an initial softer spring rate.

You should check this before you jump to the conclusion that it is the progressive rate that is causing the initial vagueness. Firstly check that you actually have progressive springs in the front (unlikely). Then have a look under the car (on ramps with the weight on the wheels) and see if there are any of the progressive coils not sitting on top of one another. That will tell you if there is in fact any progression at all in the dynamic spring rate.

:huh: cheers :)

The roll cage will also add weight...

And the other thing, potentially your subconsous could make you think you can go round coners safer because you have a cage around you, like, even if you come off, you wont die kinda thing, strange how the mind works.

Thanks for the replies everyone :)

I am going purely off the in seat feel, not corner speed. In some ways the feel is more important to me as my car rarely sees the track.

The tyres I'm running are 205/60/15 so there is a distinct possibility that the sidewalls are flexing before the suspension. I'll borrow some lower profile rubber to test this theory.

My front springs are definitely progressive. I will check if any of the progressive coils aren't touching each other tomorrow in the light. Thanks for your help :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
    • You put the driver's seat on the wrong side! Incredible detail on all of this. It looks like you could learn a lot about the car just from assembling the kit.
×
×
  • Create New...