Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So after dyno'ing my pretty stock car @ 158rwkw. Im wanting upgrades :D

So been reading and looking at HKS ones they seem pretty good.

Whats the difference between that and say the CRD ones?

The pipe goes over or under for the HKS/CRD ones?

What other ones are avaliable?

Leaning towards getting a japan ready made one.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/85769-intercooler-questions/
Share on other sites

indeed ARC make very good coolers, but there is always the ongoing bitching discusion on using the stock pipe route will create more lag. I think it comes down to personal preference and do you want less piping and better throttle response?

I just got a cooler put on, it doesnt use the stock pipe route, it goes up and over the engine. No omplaints, and i can noticed a lsight increase in power. Need dyno to see what im making.

Good luck!

AVO also do a kit that uses the stock pipes. One advantage of this is that you don't need to cut a hole for the outlet pipe. @ $1430

The main advantage is that the outlet from the cooler is not being heated by the hot air from the radiatior.

There is a lot of info on their website.

http://www.avoturbo.com/construction.html

ARE are a manufacturer who also have heaps of info.

http://www.are.com.au/feat/techtalk/intecoolersMR.htm

Hmm.... Still comes down to the brand vs non branded debate.

I had a friend's bros skyline where the piping went over the engine and the fan and the blate nicked the piping and it cracked the engine and broke it up.

Yeah i have the same piping setup on my R34 and all

you need to do when doing this set up is to trim the fan blades

enough to clear the pipe and there will be no problems whats so ever

once done right. Plus this set up, i think myself is a nicer way of displaying

the pipes and also it gives some detail/looks in the engine bay.

Good Luck

Yep fitted my fake Hybrid cooler on the weekend it took me ages cos I was doing it myself but it was well worth can feel the extra power straight away and you can hear the difference. Just need to get a fuel controller cos with standard ecu car runs heaps rich and guzzles fuel. But apart from that for like $600 for the kit and no cost for labour i am very pleased. :rolleyes::)

post-14246-1125457016.jpg

post-14246-1125457052.jpg

Edited by LANFOH
If you have not done turbo back exhaust yet, then I would do that before doing a FMIC.

I put on the justjap cooler.

Now pushing a solid 0.7 bar up to red line.

Can you please explain more on that turbo back exhaust.

How much would that set me back?

I already have an aftermarket exhaust. HKS Super Dragger. Is that it?

Can you please explain more on that turbo back exhaust.

How much would that set me back?

I already have an aftermarket exhaust. HKS Super Dragger. Is that it?

noticed on mine that the split dump systems allowed the car to rev out quite alot easier and definately increased power.. if you still have the stock dump pipe down to the Catalitic convertor then i would invest in a new dump pipe for sure...

something like this :

uasstainpipegtst.jpg

$450 i think from UAS

Edited by Craved

To get the most out of a turbo back, you will need to upgrade the cat converter too.

Note that fitting a dump/front pipe is a fairly labour intensive job - especially if the screws joining the turbo to the stock dump have rusted over (which they probably have).

But the differences in pressure drop between a branded and non branded seem to be rather significant?

On another note, don't just go for the biggest FMIC you can (ie 600 * 300 * 76), as lag is our enemy.

its one of those things where the lingo gets confusing...

dump pipes are really the first part of the exhaust that the turbo bolts onto. this part is where there are usually 2 pipes that join a bit further on in the pipe. one is smaller, for the wastegate, and one is larger for the turbine exhaust gasses.

here's a pic for a r32 gtr:

image_01.jpg

the dump pipes or 'extension' pipes bolt on to the 'front' pipe.

front pipe comes after the dump, and before the cat.

heres a pic, also for r32 gtr:

sfp_image_01.jpg

the pic CRAVED posted is a dump and front pipe all in one.

it shouldn't matter if its 2 or 1 piece and will differ from car to car, make to make.

hope that helps

dan

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...