Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So after dyno'ing my pretty stock car @ 158rwkw. Im wanting upgrades :D

So been reading and looking at HKS ones they seem pretty good.

Whats the difference between that and say the CRD ones?

The pipe goes over or under for the HKS/CRD ones?

What other ones are avaliable?

Leaning towards getting a japan ready made one.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/85769-intercooler-questions/
Share on other sites

indeed ARC make very good coolers, but there is always the ongoing bitching discusion on using the stock pipe route will create more lag. I think it comes down to personal preference and do you want less piping and better throttle response?

I just got a cooler put on, it doesnt use the stock pipe route, it goes up and over the engine. No omplaints, and i can noticed a lsight increase in power. Need dyno to see what im making.

Good luck!

AVO also do a kit that uses the stock pipes. One advantage of this is that you don't need to cut a hole for the outlet pipe. @ $1430

The main advantage is that the outlet from the cooler is not being heated by the hot air from the radiatior.

There is a lot of info on their website.

http://www.avoturbo.com/construction.html

ARE are a manufacturer who also have heaps of info.

http://www.are.com.au/feat/techtalk/intecoolersMR.htm

Hmm.... Still comes down to the brand vs non branded debate.

I had a friend's bros skyline where the piping went over the engine and the fan and the blate nicked the piping and it cracked the engine and broke it up.

Yeah i have the same piping setup on my R34 and all

you need to do when doing this set up is to trim the fan blades

enough to clear the pipe and there will be no problems whats so ever

once done right. Plus this set up, i think myself is a nicer way of displaying

the pipes and also it gives some detail/looks in the engine bay.

Good Luck

Yep fitted my fake Hybrid cooler on the weekend it took me ages cos I was doing it myself but it was well worth can feel the extra power straight away and you can hear the difference. Just need to get a fuel controller cos with standard ecu car runs heaps rich and guzzles fuel. But apart from that for like $600 for the kit and no cost for labour i am very pleased. :rolleyes::)

post-14246-1125457016.jpg

post-14246-1125457052.jpg

Edited by LANFOH
If you have not done turbo back exhaust yet, then I would do that before doing a FMIC.

I put on the justjap cooler.

Now pushing a solid 0.7 bar up to red line.

Can you please explain more on that turbo back exhaust.

How much would that set me back?

I already have an aftermarket exhaust. HKS Super Dragger. Is that it?

Can you please explain more on that turbo back exhaust.

How much would that set me back?

I already have an aftermarket exhaust. HKS Super Dragger. Is that it?

noticed on mine that the split dump systems allowed the car to rev out quite alot easier and definately increased power.. if you still have the stock dump pipe down to the Catalitic convertor then i would invest in a new dump pipe for sure...

something like this :

uasstainpipegtst.jpg

$450 i think from UAS

Edited by Craved

To get the most out of a turbo back, you will need to upgrade the cat converter too.

Note that fitting a dump/front pipe is a fairly labour intensive job - especially if the screws joining the turbo to the stock dump have rusted over (which they probably have).

But the differences in pressure drop between a branded and non branded seem to be rather significant?

On another note, don't just go for the biggest FMIC you can (ie 600 * 300 * 76), as lag is our enemy.

its one of those things where the lingo gets confusing...

dump pipes are really the first part of the exhaust that the turbo bolts onto. this part is where there are usually 2 pipes that join a bit further on in the pipe. one is smaller, for the wastegate, and one is larger for the turbine exhaust gasses.

here's a pic for a r32 gtr:

image_01.jpg

the dump pipes or 'extension' pipes bolt on to the 'front' pipe.

front pipe comes after the dump, and before the cat.

heres a pic, also for r32 gtr:

sfp_image_01.jpg

the pic CRAVED posted is a dump and front pipe all in one.

it shouldn't matter if its 2 or 1 piece and will differ from car to car, make to make.

hope that helps

dan

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...