Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guys could one of the drag racers/competitors here please help me out with understanding what the times mean.

What is the difference between a car that runs 12.1 @ 98mph and one that runs 12.1 @ 131mph?

If the ET is the same, does the car with the lower top speed find more traction from the line so that it can accelerate faster/sooner?

It seems to be a 1.6 60' is a guy that can drive and a car with plenty of go, and a 2.5 60' is someone who probably drives like me. Are there any other figures that give you an indication of what is going on?

Thanks in advance,

Mark

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/86369-understanding-drag-stats/
Share on other sites

Guys could one of the drag racers/competitors here please help me out with understanding what the times mean.

What is the difference between a car that runs 12.1 @ 98mph and one that runs 12.1 @ 131mph?

If the ET is the same, does the car with the lower top speed find more traction from the line so that it can accelerate faster/sooner?

It seems to be a 1.6 60' is a guy that can drive and a car with plenty of go, and a 2.5 60' is someone who probably drives like me. Are there any other figures that give you an indication of what is going on?

Thanks in advance,

Mark

Mark, it isn't that simple! There are many factors at play which make straight line projections worthless.

Nevertheless there are some general rules of thumb which can help you analyse a full timeslip.

For a well sorted car the following ETs and trap speeds are well accepted:

13.0 @ 100 mph

12.0 @ 110 mph

11.0 @ 120 mph

10.0 @ 130 mph

9.0 @ 145 mph

8.5 @ 155 mph

8.0@ 165 mph

7.5 @ 175 mph

Note that late model, IRS cars tend to run slower ETs and faster trap speeds. That is indicative that the IRS, lack of space for rubber and less efficient weigh transfer work against these types of cars.

Regarding your questions, a stovehot driver with a slow car may still only be able to manage a 2.0 short time. A poor driver with a monster car might manage a lousy 1.5 short time, if you follow my drift.

Thanks for your replies guys. Your comments have cleared things up some, but I'm not sure if you're implying that quoting an ET isn't *too* helpful when comparing cars, but they will generally follow the scale MrBlonde mentioned?

Still wondering. It'd be nice to know when some guy is spinning you a line about his latest effort at WSID. Sounds like I need to get my butt down to the drag strip and watch a few races to understand things better! :D

The figures MrBlonde gave are indicative of ideal runs and are a very good guide as to what a well sorted car can achieve on a good run. Not all runs are ideal and therefore other factors (such as wheelspin, pedalling, slow gear changes, backing off, car out of shape etc) will see variations on those guides. There are other figures that will give further indication as to how the run went, such as 330', 660' and 1000' times and speeds.

Sounds like I need to get my butt down to the drag strip and watch a few races to understand things better! ;)
That's the best way to learn. I've been to easily 80-90% of all events held at WSID and seen a zillions runs and i'm still amazed at how quick some drivers/cars go with minimal power/mods.

You would be quite suprised how many drivers I meet in the staging lanes out in the pits whom are totally stoked at their ET's only to tell them that they could easily do another 0.3-0.5sec quicker just with a few adjustments and/or more experience without any modifications.

Note that late model, IRS cars tend to run slower ETs and faster trap speeds. That is indicative that the IRS, lack of space for rubber and less efficient weigh transfer work against these types of cars.

Modern IRS cars, especially "sports" ones, tend to have geometry that increases camber as the suspension compresses.

If you're powering out of a corner that's great, but if you're trying to launch then its not ideal.

  • 4 weeks later...

can anyone tell me what an ET of 14.5 with a TS of 100mph would indicate.

I am a crap drag racer and have never broken 14.3 but my TS is always up around the 100mph mark, and my 60' is always around 2.2+

Does this indicate that my car could run faster with a decent driver at the wheel? and can someone tell me what sort of times it should be capable of running with those figures?

can anyone tell me what an ET of 14.5 with a TS of 100mph would indicate.

I am a crap drag racer and have never broken 14.3 but my TS is always up around the 100mph mark, and my 60' is always around 2.2+

Does this indicate that my car could run faster with a decent driver at the wheel? and can someone tell me what sort of times it should be capable of running with those figures?

Car could definately run faster with a decent 60' time.

My mph (104mph) isn't much higher than yours, yet I've run a best ET of 12.9...the big difference is 60', mine was ~1.8.

If you could get your 60' down to around a 2.0, then I believe that you should easily net a mid to high 13 :(

Car could definately run faster with a decent 60' time.

My mph (104mph) isn't much higher than yours, yet I've run a best ET of 12.9...the big difference is 60', mine was ~1.8.

If you could get your 60' down to around a 2.0, then I believe that you should easily net a mid to high 13 :)

Thanks for the reply......looks like I need to practice my launches. I don't like being too brutal on my car though, hence the slow 60' times.

Maybe I should give up on drag racing. I think you need a certain amount of mechanical disregard to be a good drag racer :(

Thanks for the reply......looks like I need to practice my launches.  I don't like being too brutal on my car though, hence the slow 60' times.

Maybe I should give up on drag racing.  I think you need a certain amount of mechanical disregard to be a good drag racer :P

Everything that breaks is just an opportunity to make your car stronger ;-)

can anyone tell me what an ET of 14.5 with a TS of 100mph would indicate.

Just as an indication I did 14.0 @ 100mph with a 2.0sec 60ft time and i've seen many others do 13.7-14.0's with 100mph.

So seems like you need to work on the first 330ft section of the drag strip.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...