Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I had a chance to post up my old car pics a while back if you guys remember.

The old rims were WORK Emotion CR Kai in Bronze. Front were 17x9 and rear 18x9.5

The new rims are:

WORK VS-KF's with new Kumho Ecsta SPT rubber. The spokes are Burnt Black, lip is chrome.

Front 17x10

Rear 18x10.5

Front Dish: 100mm

Rear Dish: 120mm

Special Thanks To: KEEP Performance Lab for doing all the work on the car. They had to re-roll all four fenders to fit the new rims.

The bodywork to smooth out and paint all 4 fenders is obviously unfinished. I'll probably wait until my new bumper arrives to repaint everything at once.

Hope you guys enjoy the pics.

All comments welcome :D

FULL SIZE PICS AVAILABLE HERE: www.pbase.com/suomyairsoft/new_rims&page=1

BEFORE

large.jpg

44830212.jpg

AFTER

large.jpg

large.jpg

large.jpg

large.jpg

large.jpg

large.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/87642-new-work-vs-kf-rims-on-my-r32/
Share on other sites

:)

One thing is that there's some clearance issues with 18's on the front since I really enjoy having the car slammed super low to the ground.

Also running staggered it makes the rear rims and the rear of the car look bigger / wider. I think the best part of a skyline is the "rear end" lol.

Damn nice car man! The old rims were cool and the new ones are just damnn cool!! :P

How come you always get 17s for the front and 18s for the back?? Any special reason?

That's nice...

there is a thread here about matte / satin black paint jobs... your car is mentioned in there somewhere...

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...showtopic=85813

should post a pic there of it :P

VERY VERY NICE!!!!

try get a original gtr front bar, i had one like urs and i found an original plastic one looks better....

up 2 u

i agree with you about low 32's, only way to do it

Edited by silver gts-t
  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...