Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I want to put an exhaust on the 33 to get it sounding a bit meaner as well as getting the 15to25kw increase in power various mechanics has told me it would unleash (turbo back that is) but I dont have the money buy some sort of new ecu to tune it for the exhaust and pod. Ive noticed that when i have dragged some guys that i thought would rip my stock r33 due to their ones having exhaust and big front mounts, they are actually slower, and im not imagining my cars fast or something, it was proven by comparison times at calder park mine stock 14.6 others with the above mentioned mods (at least) same at best but others still getting low 15etc, they were manual gtst's as well.

I know there are heaps of r33 getting 12, 11 and below but im asuming these guys would have spent $1000s on new computers.

So back to my question will modifying the car without getting a tune result in worse performance?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/88081-can-mods-less-performance/
Share on other sites

doing exhaust/pod wouldnt be too bad.

You can get performance gains there.

Upping the boost to 10psi i think you'd get away with also

Obviously it will run better with SAF-C/PowerFC or similar but it will still go ok if you do exhaust/pod no problems.

As for the other cars not beating you.

I'd put that down to driver

or older engines not making as much power.. bad suspension setups, cheap tyres as they spent the all the money on the fancy front mount, etc, etc.

First thing you can almost tell how well somebody is going to run, is scoping out their tyres :blink:

or older engines not making  as much power.. bad suspension setups, cheap tyres as they spent the all the money on the fancy front mount, etc, etc.

First thing you can almost tell how well somebody is going to run, is scoping out their tyres ;)

I think you missed the obvious one: shit drivers :blink:

yeah it probably is the more hammered engines producing less power theory coupled with shit driving, i dunno about the tyres though coz ive got Simex, as far as i know they are the cheapest worste tyres money can buy, just got them for complience lol.

Aftermarket computer for only exhaust and pod??? just reset your ecu and it will run mad!!! If you dont want to reset the ecu just drive it around for abit and ur ecu will auto learn the new mods.dont even worry about it now. whenever you up the boost and go for a front mount and if you want a blow off valve then go the safcII or power fc.

I met a guy who has only the safc II with boost at 10 pounds,front mount,turbo back exhaust , panel air filter and properly tuned I think he got like 185-190kw at the wheels. now thats a pretty quick street car

crock of shit, ill give him a run im making 193rwkw with powerfc i bet i blow the pants off him, safc makes top end power doesnt make quick streeter car as the stock ecu decides the final story of timing/fuel

yeah it probably is the more hammered engines producing less power theory coupled with shit driving, i dunno about the tyres though coz ive got Simex, as far as i know they are the cheapest worste tyres money can buy, just got them for complience lol.

Simex are actually pretty good for straight line grip.

They have a very very soft sidewall that causes the tyre to flatten out on to the road. Not good for cornering.

I've tried a few tyres and actually found the simex to grip in a striaght line than Goodyear F1, Bridgestone B530, Firenza ST-03, Sava.

All normal tyres, obviously a nice set of tyres will out grip the simex but for the price, they are damn good.

Remember Rev210 in his near stock high 12 sec R33 GTST, that ran 205 simex. :P

Stock R33 ECU's have self-learning capabilities? :P

Your stock ECU should be fine with just pod and exhaust, but just an interceptor or a piggyback like E-Manage should be enough for your car. It really depends on how far you want to go mate. If you don't plan on changing turbos, injectors, afm etc. then a SAFC to change AFR's to more suitable levels (for both power and better fuel economy) should be enough, or if you want to do ignition as well get the E-Manage.

Good to see you're doing comparisons with quater mile times though, power figures only go so far. 1/4 mile and trap speed all the way mate. ;) And yeah the guys you raced are probably really crappy drivers. =\ Even if the engine was complete crap, I can't imagine ALL the skylines there had buggered engines. Low to mid 14's sound right on the mark for a R33 with pod, full exhaust and bit of boost in my opinion.

Aftermarket computer for only exhaust and pod??? just reset your ecu and it will run mad!!!
Stock R33 ECU's have self-learning capabilities?

so who's right? will an ecu reset put forward any benefits? its hard to belive a program can start learning how to perform beter once an exhaust and pod have been added to the car. I know how to reset it, but will it make a difference, and is it true you really need to thrash the car heaps after doin it, or is it just more fun to do it that way ;)

The Powerfc is obviously better but a SAFC style device shouldnt loose out too much to a PFC if relatively stock right. Assuming You are close to detonation and you are able to get almost 12:1 AFR then there is no reason why a PFC will make more average power.

I find that even on stock boost with exhaust and R34 intercooler I can sometimes feel the ECU cutting the timing especially in cold weather when the air is more dense.

Installing a jaycar fuel adjuster to see if it helps.

Sometime I think the mods can make it slower if you dont adjust the Airflow readings or reprogram ECU/new ECU

Edited by benl1981

If you are on the boarderline of detonation and at 12:1 AFR for the whole rev band then you won't gain by having a PFC. Obviously there are less compromises with the PFC to ensure that you can advance the timing enough and lean out the mixxtures to avoid detonation. Sometimes you wont get it perfect with the SAFC but I think in some cases average power would be similar

To answer the thread. Ofcourse a mod can loose performance. Lots of mods could and do, do this. Cams: change the curve, so at some points, its not going to be as good as without. Turbo, bigger, laggier. Obviously if you do a stupid thing, like, put a massive turbo on a car and leave the exhaust and ecu and cams stock, it won't work very well at all. Or take it to extremes, modify your car by putting a smaller engine in and it may well lose power. So mods aren't always going to equal power, you gotta be a little educated about it.

I'd say alot of stock cars are getting around that have good compression and are in a healthy running order which will outway a few kws gained by having an exhaust and a pod.

If you are on the boarderline of detonation and at 12:1 AFR for the whole rev band then you won't gain by having a PFC.  Obviously there are less compromises with the PFC to ensure that you can advance the timing enough and lean out the mixxtures to avoid detonation.  Sometimes you wont get it perfect with the SAFC but I think in some cases average power would be similar

Unfortunately its not the way it is.

Note all the ppls that have gone to a pfc and gone. 'wow' the extra mid range power.

I would kill to have a good look at a rb20det or rb25det stock ecu's ignition map.

Edited by Cubes

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Try looking at Eibacb/H&R springs Thats what Gary sourced for mine.
    • Hey y'all! I'm curious about how y'all go about widebodying your cars. I noticed that when running a square setup, my front wheels are a bit more tucked in than my rear wheels. Not by much, maybe 5-10mm. This leads me to wonder - when I widebody, should I use narrower front flares and wider rear flares? I found a set of 40mm rear flares that I really like, and was thinking of pairing them with some 18mm front flares, but I don't want the car to look strange. How have others done this? Note, I'm in a sedan. Thanks!
    • And if it was anything other than an auto tranny part, it might be a problem. But seeing as all auto trannies belong in the recycling bin, it's fine.
    • I have an R32 Fenix rad. It is good.
    • All the schemas I can see, indicate your typical setup of ATF 'cooler' (read: heat exchanger) in the bottom radiator tank..ie; https://nissan.epc-data.com/stagea/wgnc34/5413-rb25det/engine/214/ ...but I can prattle on a bit here. These trannies have a thermistor in the sump ~ the TCU reads this and 1. bumps the line pressure up when the ATF is 'cold' and 2. prevents the TC lockup clutch from operating, until the ATF comes up to minimum operating temp (keeps the ATF 'churning' through the TC so it heats up quicker) -- trigger point is around 55C. In these conditions, the engine coolant temperature rises faster than the ATF temperature, and also helps heat the ATF up, which is why it's best to think of the in radiator tank setup as a heat exchanger ; the heat can flow in both directions... ...with these trannies, the 'hot' ATF comes out the front banjo bolt, flows through the cooler/heat exchanger, and returns to the box  via the rear banjo bolt. This gets a mention, due to the wildly different opinions wrt running auto trans fluid coolers ~ do you bypass the in radiator tank altogether, or put the cooler inline with the in radiator tank system...and then, do you put the additional cooler before of after the in radiator tank system?... ....fact is the nominal engine operating temp (roughly 75C), happens to be the ideal temperature for the ATF used in these trannies as well (no surprises there), so for the in radiator tank system to actually 'cool' the ATF, the ATF temp has to be hotter than that...lets say 100C -- you've got 25C of 'excess' heat, (slowly) pumping into the 75C coolant. This part of the equation changes drastically, when you've got 100C ATF flowing through an air cooled radiator ; you can move a lot more excess heat, faster ~ it is possible to cool the ATF 'too much' as it were...(climate matters a lot)... ...in an 'ideal' setup, what you're really trying to control here, is flash heating of the ATF, primarily produced by the TC interface. In a perfect world, wrt auto trans oil cooling, you want a dedicated trans cooler with builtin thermostatic valving - they exist. These should be run inline and before the in radiator tank system ~ when 'cold' the valving bypasses the fin stack, allowing the ATF to flow direct to the in radiator tank heat exchanger, so it works 'as intended' with helping heat the ATF up. When 'hot' (iirc it was 50C threshold), the valving shuts forcing the ATF through the cooler fin stack, and onto the in radiator tank heat exchanger...and you sort of think of it as a 'thermal conditioner' of sorts...ie; if you did cool your ATF down to 65C, the coolant will add a little heat, otherwise it works as intended... ...the 'hot' ATF coming from the front bango bolt, is instantiated from the TC when in use, so all/any flash heated oil, flows to the fluid-to-air cooler first, and because of the greater heat differential, you can get rid of this heat fast. Just how big (BTU/h) this cooler needs to be to effectively dissipate this TC flash heat, is the charm...too many variables to discuss here, but I just wanted to point out the nitty-gritty of automatic trans fluid coolers ~ they're a different beastie to what most ppl think of when considering an 'oil cooler'... /3.5cents   
×
×
  • Create New...