Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 103.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • GTS-t VSPEC

    20904

  • Nizmo

    13582

  • SHUTO-BOY

    6636

  • skyzerr33

    5353

Ahhh , I see pwptf is back and so am I .

Macka , that's not nice , your supposed to say thats great , exciting, wonderful , visually stimulating blah blah....

Anyway for all the rest that may be interested ( prolly only micko , pwptf and me mum ) I got 10th.

Not flash but there were two open wheelers , two bloody quick westfields and a race BMW.

Only real street car to beat me was a ...................

WRX , oh the shame , the shame.

Sorry I let the lines down and it won't happen again.

Cheers

(Not happy )

Ken

No , under boost should not have made that much difference.

Front is actually as low as it can go and still not invert the lower arms.

My only excuse is that I didn't change the brake fluid or pads from Japan and the brakes were crap , braking at the end of the main straight at 150 marker within 1 lap instead of 80m

Cheers

( still not happy )

Ken

That rex is in for a surprise a little later in the year.

It was running autronic with antilag , pagid pads , big boost and only got me by about 1/2 sec.

All that is coming for mine and the AP 6 spots will solve the brakes.

Cheers

( not quite so unhappy )

Ken

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Latest Posts

    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
    • That's my life. Past-Duncan has a lot to answer for
×
×
  • Create New...