Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 103.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • GTS-t VSPEC

    20904

  • Nizmo

    13582

  • SHUTO-BOY

    6636

  • skyzerr33

    5353

Originally posted by GTS-t VSPEC

*Ken reliving past glories*:bahaha:

Swedish skid car? a Volvo?

See'ya:burnout:

Take a look in the garage at the next MC day and you will see what I mean.

Trust me , teaching the general population about skid control , recognition and recovery is not easy.

The amount of people who react about 2 secs behind the car is scarey:mad:

Cheers

Ken

Originally posted by bully

Ken i used the one at Puckapunyal in victoria I was A Navy driving istructor there -- i think we had the firsts set in the country

That would have been the ones with landrovers on them.

I think you got them thru NZ

Cheers

Ken

Originally posted by GTS-t VSPEC

Bully,

Thanks for the lesson in old cars. You old guys are good for something.

See'ya:burnout:

ahh youth and stupidity ......

Goes hand in hand . Little one , listen for there is much to learn.....

Cheers

Ken

Originally posted by bully

yer we also set them o up with some Falcons on them

we had Nissan Pulsar N14's on ours and moved to toyota Camrys ( V6 ).

Used to love doing the reverse flick into h/brake into reverse flick after the students had gone.

Any one who reckons you can't opposite lock a front wheel drive has NOT been in one of these things. Hehehehe

Cheers

Ken

Originally posted by bully

Ken -- do you know Geoff Branch??

No but I believe a couple of guys came from the Army over there with skid car experience and are working for DTEC

John Willmot is one I think

Cheers

Ken

Originally posted by gtrken

we had Nissan Pulsar N14's on ours and moved to toyota Camrys ( V6 ).

Used to love doing the reverse flick into h/brake into reverse flick after the students had gone.

Any one who reckons you can't opposite lock a front wheel drive has NOT been in one of these things. Hehehehe

Cheers

Ken

i think i saw a video of that set up with the camrys once when we were look into contracting out driver training for the services

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...