Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 103.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • GTS-t VSPEC

    20904

  • Nizmo

    13582

  • SHUTO-BOY

    6636

  • skyzerr33

    5353

Hmm , no pwptpf and the Whoress.

Must still be coming the long way home from Albany.

For those interested , Paul , Lauren , Troy , Kyles , Myself and missus were at Albany for the Hillclimb and the motorkhana.

Danny ( GT500 ) and g/f came down for a few hrs on Sat.

I ran the ricer in the Hillclimb and won it ( yea , phuck me I was surprised as well )!!

Did the khana with the missus driving as well and finished who bloody knows where but had a good time.

pwptpf took plenty of Vid with my camera ( sorry , no in car this time ) so Neo maaaaaaaatttteeee!

can you turn it into something useable ????? huh , huh , please ??

Cheers

Ken

Steve was adamant that the wholagans 470 hp atw GTR would hose everyone.

Jamie couldn't get the power down , hit a cone , fell off boost , all of the above.

John only got one run due to delays and when I got back at the finish after being to the Khana , I found I had the fastest time.

Ahh well , it's all good.

BTW , Ivan's ( Speedworks corolla ) is no more. Hit the bank , smashed the lhf wheel and tipped it down the road on it's side.

He's OK but the car is a mess.

Cheers

Ken

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Latest Posts

    • "lol dunno" either But like you, I can't see any reason they would need to be different LHD to RHD
    • I agree with you WRT the hard top. MX5's may be one of the better looking soft tops but I cannot think of ANY car, EVER that looks better with a soft top vs a hard top (or a designed roof). At all, ever. I also feel this way about the C5 Vette, the Z06 looks horrible compared to it's original form, it has an exaggerated version of the differences you're talking about.  
    • Hey crew, Failed my WOF cause of a lower control arm, and I've decided to hit both arms, and also the compression rods at the same time(seems they're gonna be the most likely upcoming failure points from some discussions with the lads over on the G35 reddit). I've looking at these form Z1:  https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-compression-rod-p-40716.html https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-lower-control-arm-p-40674.html I asked Z1 if they'd work as it's the same platform, just RHD vs LHD. I basically got told "Lol dunno". Specifically they aren't aware of any difference but can't guarantee fitment as they haven't done it on a 350GT. So guess I'm asking is if there is any issues with using 2005 G35 coupe suspension parts on a 2005 350GT coupe? Orginally I thought it could be something in the way of the arms that each control arm is designed to be positioned around, but that'd be an engineering nightmare for Nissan needing two different shaped control arms 😅
    • ^ This. The mode door actuator is a common failure, as is the actuator and/or the actual valve for the coolant flow control valve. I also don't know how available the mode door actuator is these days. I've been meaning to look into it and get one from wherever is possible, to keep in the shed for the rainy day when mine eventually fails. Anyway, the advice to you is to search the usual NOS part supply places, or even just go to Nissan and see what they list.
    • Have you got a pic of the actuator? My guess is that unit has failed internally and was flopping around, so the previous engineer who owned it forced it to be fully open to cold air (blocking the heater core path). As far as you can tell, is anything else wrong in the system? Likely you just need a new actuator (not sure how available they are) and then "installation is the reverse of disassembly"
×
×
  • Create New...