Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I did run a full twin stainless from off the front pipes(2x3").It scraped around the rear diff area so welded small plates where it scraped. The car was too low i admit however.With only small rear mufflers,it had the typical gtr scream but with a gurgle added to it. Now have a full titanium 90mm and it is just as loud and scraped.Lesson:if you have a small gap between the top of the tyre and the guard,it generally doesnt scrape.

P.S.full stainless twin and front pipes for sale(under 300km old)In the process of putting in a couple of hotdog style mufflers to quieten it down.Unbelievable sound for track work!!

im thinking of the twin 3" idea but how do i fit twin mufflers? do u step them along obviously and u run the pipes alongside each other?

my rb26 with twins had 3" dumps, merging to 4" cat and then into single 3.5" with 2 mufflers and its f**kin annoying as hell, it wakes people 10 streets away when idleing :P

anyone got pics of setups of where the situate the mufflers to quieten it down :)

cheers

Brad

Any exhaust made from anything other than mild steel is loud (due to wall thickness)

Mine is a straight through system - ie no cat, no mid mufflers, no hot dogs. Just 2 x 3" Jasma mufflers on the rear thats it....Its very quiet, and it doesnt drone.

Below is a pic of part of my system. It has since been modified to fit my car (was off an r33) The hangers are chopped and rewelded, and the flange has been cutoff and its now a single 3.5" into twin pipes after the cat. The system shown stops before the diff.

post-3692-1127534906.jpg

Edited by Bl4cK32

First off, U gotta love SAU, U can always find what U need.

Heres a pic of a Nismo exhaust.

http://www.nismo.co.jp/products/catalyzer/images/p2_01.jpg

Also, can someone clarify flow rates for different size pipes ie.

2inch = ???cfm

2.25inch = ???cfm

and so on.

Thanks

If going duals on a twin-turbo GTR would it be best to go a crossover pipe from the dump/front pipes like most V8's do with pipes from each cyclinder bank?

yep, thats what i was told to do otherwise the sound its horrid!

doesnt have to but a huge one either, just enough to balance pulses... or something like that

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...