Jump to content
SAU Community

Type M Brake Upgrade Probs

1400r
 Share

Recommended Posts

1400r Veteran

1400r

Posted
Posted

I did my non type m to type m brake upgrade over the weekend as I got some 4 spotters for free of my boss, however I didnt get the type m rotors.

Everthing went on fine I had a little trouble bleeding the brakes but every thing seems fine now the brakes seemed really firm until I turned the car on and went for a blat. The brakes have to be almost on the floor before there is any retardation I assumed that the smaller stock rotors wouldnt be a problem as it would just be similar to running worn brake pads?

I also used the pads that were with the 4 spotters rather than buying new ones as I wasnt planning on doing the upgrade till I had the funds for the set of types front rear and new pads.

1. Should I buy a set of new pads and see how they go (dont really want to do this as it may only slight help but not fix the problem)

2. As the pedal feels very firm when you pump it up, have I not bleed the brakes correctly? (I printed of the s14 manual and followed it after searching for hours on end)

3. Should I try and get some type M rotors as the non ones are to thin?

4. take it to a brake place and confuse them with the whole type m non type thing and end up spending heaps of cash replacing brake master cylinders, getting the 4 spotters rebuilt etc because they dont know what there doing

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/89701-type-m-brake-upgrade-probs/
Share on other sites
urbanoperations Proficient

urbanoperations

Posted
Posted (edited)

what rotors are you using?

you cant use non turbo rotors on Turbo 4 spot calipers as the rotors are to thin , change to the r32 GTST rotors as they are thicker and they are the direct fit for that caliper....

Edited by urbanoperations
salival Enthusiast

salival

Posted
Posted
thanks dude but Ive got turbo non type m rotors Im going to change them over now anyway

You might also want to check which size your master cylinder is.. it's stamped on the side.. gts-t is 15/16

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • sinn3r
      R34 Skyline climate control unit transistor

      By sinn3r · Posted

      Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • Kinkstaah
      Blue slip

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • GTSBoy
      Best place to order Authetic R32 Parts in Japan

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • GTSBoy
      Ethanol Content Sensor - Always at 11%?

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • GTSBoy
      Blue slip

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...