Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

We have been doing heaps of tests on oils recently, as we have set up a test using a head in a jig tied into a lathe. The head is then spun at 6000rpm with a syrenge set up on a timer to periodically drop 20ml of oil on the the cam lobes with the test performed for 20mins on each oil. The cam and all related valvetrain is then swapped for another set of new gear so we can gauge exactly what each oil is doing. The tests we are doing are a little crude as compared to full laboritory testing but funnily enough castrol has been sending us samples of new oils they are releasing, initially i think to see if we knew what we were doing but now as a secondary source of info.

The problem is each year oil companys are under stricter and stricter regualations on emissions which means they are removing good minerals and chemicals that prelong engine life and stop engine wear.

It has been very interesting to see what some of the oils have done under the testing. Synthetics are generally half as good as even the cheapest mineral oil, but alot of cars must run synthetic for the weight properties. I dont want to bad mouth any oils and I wont but from our tests, if you want a good synthetic oil for your car run a motor bike oil like motul or repsoil. The oil for motorbikes doesnt need to meet emissions testing and it it designed better as in a bike it has to be under more loads as the gearbox uses the same oil. About the closest to these in terms of performance in our testing would be redline synthetic, and motul 300. There are few good other ones but these few I have mentioned are easily available to most of you guys.

Hope this helps

Castrol was quite good with there mineral 20-50w oil being one of the very best commercial oils and its a good price. There synthetics were better than alot of the others but still not what you would want for the price you pay, alot better than the other major three if you can read between the lines.

For a more standard engine ie, standard lift, duration, valve spring rates its is sufficient!! PM If you want some direct comparisons!!

Cheers.

Gearbox redline light weight shock proof

diff redline mt90

gtr tranfers DONT USE REDLINE you most use the matic d nissan oil if you want it to last (this came from a head more knowledgable than myself who had rebuilt a shit load of transfers)

engine mobile 1 is good so is the redline products

I use redline light wieght shock proof in the transfer too... its great no complaints so far :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
×
×
  • Create New...