Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Below is two pics of the GT35r (GT35/40R) turbos.

The one on the left has the .5 front cover as it came off the ford xr6 turbo.

The one on the right has a .7 front cover supplied aftermarket.

The turbo on the left (.5 ar front ) has a hose going from the actuator to a bung on the compressor cover, where the 0.7 cover one on the left doesnt have this at all.

Where do you need to attatch the hose coming off the actuator if you have the 0.7 front cover?? Somewhere after the outlet of the turbo on the pipework?

Thanks :)

post-3692-1128825810.jpg

post-3692-1128826268.jpeg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90432-xr6-gt35r/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

cool. Now for another question :O

Is it just a simple job of swapping the 0.5 cover for a 0.7 cover between the two turbos?

Ive heard so many people say they are different specs, but are they different, or the same? ie, if i bought the one on the left, could i unbolt the front cover and swap it for a 0.7 ar front?

Thanks :)

Edited by Bl4cK32
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90432-xr6-gt35r/#findComment-1629830
Share on other sites

No , the .50 cover is T04E series where the .70 is T04S series . You would need to change the back plate/adapter ring as well . These butt up to the flange on the comp side of the cartridges bearing housing , are sealed with an O ring and held in place by a large circlip .

Try to buy it as you want it because the bits are not always cheap , when I inquired through GCG Brett said he could supply any of the three .50/.60/.70 "E" covers or the .70 S cover for the same price .

Cheers A .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90432-xr6-gt35r/#findComment-1629994
Share on other sites

Ok, now ive got a good question disco (or anyone else) :

what is the difference between the T04E and the T04S covers...and when comparing same size covers - 0.5 T04E vs T04S?

(Also disco, what would you say would be the best on my motor, the 0.5, 0.6 or the 0.7?

What would be the difference in power spread over the 3 covers?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90432-xr6-gt35r/#findComment-1632295
Share on other sites

If you're looking to make fairly big power figures i.e. 300kw plus then you'd want to keep the .7 cover for the simple fact that it efficiently flows more air which is whats needed for big power and turbo reliability.

Anything under 300kw the .5 cover would be fine but thats pushing it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90432-xr6-gt35r/#findComment-1637173
Share on other sites

hrmmm .6 you say disco.

I would still prefer the .5, you will need all the response you can get with the 1.06.

The XR6 boys don't seem to have trouble cracking 320-340rwkw on the .5 comp cover. More than enough for the stock rod rb30. :)

Then again... The .7 comp gt35r 1.06 turbine will still have better response and spool time than an rb20det with a highflow or 2530 on it. :blink:

Edited by Cubes
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90432-xr6-gt35r/#findComment-1637534
Share on other sites

If you're looking to make fairly big power figures i.e. 300kw plus then you'd want to keep the .7 cover for the simple fact that it efficiently flows more air which is whats needed for big power and turbo reliability.

Anything under 300kw the .5 cover would be fine but thats pushing it.

Well i guess you should talk to GCG then, as they think differently. I emailed them and they said :

Thanks for the enquiry. For an RB30, I would suggest using the 0.60a/r Compressor Cover for your application. The difference between the 0.5a/r covers throughout the the T04 Range is the inlet and outlet sizes, and designs of the covers. They would all work in the same way, and produce similar, if not the same figures. We have had good success with people keeping the standard 0.70 T04S Compressor Cover, but you can drop to the 0.60 for better response

This is on a street driven car.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90432-xr6-gt35r/#findComment-1639618
Share on other sites

I would use it as is....

I mean try and if no good then swap em over....

There is just too much hear say on these topics....

I was told a standard r33 turbo on an rb20 would not produce a cent over 180rwkw and i got it too 230rwkw.... So who know's????

I would take Bretts advice as a starting point but if your un happy with the results you can always change it....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90432-xr6-gt35r/#findComment-1640890
Share on other sites

Fatz made 270rwkw on 14psi with an untouched rb26

ecu running 10:1 afrs.

If the motor has forged rods then I would say the .6-.7 a/r cover would be worth while.

Remember with the .5 on the 3ltr its not going to really start going until 3800-4000. Is it worth making it even laggier and less responsive?

Edited by Cubes
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90432-xr6-gt35r/#findComment-1643473
Share on other sites

I'll trust fact that GCG know what they are talking about. Ford used the 0.5 front as it was a low boost application to keep the power down. (am i right...lol?) I think the slighlty bigger compressor (0.6 front) will be a bit better for a little more (14 to 19 psi) boost than Ford was running. If i wanted more boost again (ie 20+ psi) id go for the 0.7 front....thats my theory anyway, and im sticking to it :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90432-xr6-gt35r/#findComment-1643533
Share on other sites

The reason Ford used the .5 comp cover is for response, nothing to do with keeping the power down or because it is a low boost application.

There is no doubt the larger comp cover will be more efficient and make the power easier but not that much.

As a bodgy comparison...

Consider the GCG highflows, the stock rb comp cover makes say 245rwkw odd. Slap on a .7 and it makes 260rwkw.

Thats 15rwkw.

Then consider dropping on a larger turbine housing, 245rwkw or so jumps to 277rwkw.

What I'm getting at is the biggest gains are to be had from the turbine side, not the compressor cover.

From what I've been reading up on, the larger .7 comp cover only offers 3-4% increase in power.

I really think your better off spending the $$ on a nice set of cams and springs that will need doing and pick your self up a second hand $1400 XR6 turbo.

Cams with the large turbine housing will work very well.

I think from more of a performance to $$ point of view.

Edited by Cubes
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90432-xr6-gt35r/#findComment-1643658
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...