Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

as the aftermerket crank swinging at a bigger angle to create the displacement

so those kit add EXTRA stress to the bearing

Extra stress on the bearings?? we are talking going from 2.6 to 2.8 here, and some of that capacity is gained from the overbore! And you are dealing with a crank that is MORE balanced than the stocker, so id say without the nasty harmonics or vibrations that ive heard people talk about, wouldnt there be less stress on the bearings than a stock rb26 crank (at the same rpm)?

as sydneykid has explained, the square 3litres "have superior rod/stroke ratio (1.79) to RB26s' (1.65), this means less side loading on the rods and the crank."

BUT, as i originally posted i dont want another 3litre thread so lets talk no more of it, i want Jap stroker crank experiences here :)

ok back to topic the three HKS kits as i understand them are

stage 1 (600ps rating)

crank

rods

pistons

$6819.12(deliveried)

stage 2 (800ps)

crank

rods

pistons (but the pistons are coated)

$8,720.87 (deliveried)

stage 3 (1200ps)

crank

rods (22mm judgen pin)

pistons (but the pistons are coated)(22mm judgen pin)

$10,738.65 (deliveried)

in my opinion i think stage 1 is good valve for money full forged stoker kit internals for under $7000 deliveried and i believe it to be capable of much higher hp then rated, coating pistons does make that much of a difference (600 to 800ps) and if i had known earlier about this kit well my current build might have been alot different. I could only see someone going above stage 1 (straight to 3) if you were out to break some hp(dyno) or drag records.

my 2 c

ps HKS conrods are simple awesome

thanks for the RELEVANT post pnblight!

I was just about to go for the stage 2 kit, then remembered that customs will make me pay 25% on top of that cost (10%gst + 15% duty)! Might it slip through?? most probably not, as apparently they are shipped in a reasonably sized wooden crate, and the declaration from nengun (or whoever) will state the value of the parts..

Now youve got me thinking about the step 1 kit. In true Jap fashion it is likely to be underrated. If a combination of stock crank, average quality upgrade rods and pistons can support 600PS, then surely the HKS 'baby' kit can handle 700+ps. I would think they would quote for an extremely long reliable service life supporting 600ps, perhaps circuit car reliable, in which case under street conditions should easy support more. Any thoughts on this??

thanks for the RELEVANT post pnblight!

I was just about to go for the stage 2 kit, then remembered that customs will make me pay 25% on top of that cost (10%gst + 15% duty)!  Might it slip through?? most probably not, as apparently they are shipped in a reasonably sized wooden crate, and the declaration from nengun (or whoever) will state the value of the parts..

Now youve got me thinking about the step 1 kit. In true Jap fashion it is likely to be underrated.  If a combination of stock crank, average quality upgrade rods and pistons can support 600PS, then surely the HKS 'baby' kit can handle 700+ps.  I would think they would quote for an extremely long reliable service life supporting 600ps, perhaps circuit car reliable, in which case under street conditions should easy support more. Any thoughts on this??

from there other kits you can say the crankin stage 1 is good for 1200ps the rods in stage 1 good for 800ps as both components are the same the only factor down rating the kit is the piston coating ,I think a quatity forged piston from HKS would be capable of alot higher ps rating i think the reason for the rating is more to given a justification for the price differences between the kits as who would pay the exact money if the rating were more like

stage 1 900ps

stage 2 1000ps

stage 3 1200ps (for example only)

do you see what i mean

sly33 would it be possible to maybe try buying it for america instead as the free trade agreement (might be cheaper just an idea)

pete

if your paying 10K for parts i reckon it's worth hopping on a plane over there and picking it up yourself. sure it costs $2K but you will save money on frieght (maybe $400?) plus can possibly negotiate a cheaper price (save maybe $500-$1000) and save duties ($1400). you would have to take the crank as carry on (carefully packed in a bag) and put the rods/pistons in your check in. could be a bit ambitous you say but on my last trip to japan i carried over 50kg back. more than 30 of that carry on.

i got funny looks carrying on some springs flying domestic, imagine the looks when they run a fat crank through the scanner! haha

Main problem with that idea for me is that i wouldnt have the time to go over there! But youve got me thinking.. i know guy whos just moved there.

Edited by SLY33

pete, i see what you mean.

but surely there are other diff's than just some piston coating to justify the extra $$? i heard or read somewhere that step1 and 2 cranks are forged counter, whereas step 3 is full billet crank like the JUN one previously mentioned??

not exactly sure..

Edited by SLY33

To quote Tomei on their 2.8 counter weight crank:

"Only 200cc displacement up. It causes dramatic change to RB26. Change is super response and big torque."

As i mentioned earlier, the 200cc extra must make more of a difference than most people would think.

To quote Tomei on their 2.8 counter weight crank:

"Only 200cc displacement up. It causes dramatic change to RB26.  Change is super response and big torque."

As i mentioned earlier, the 200cc extra must make more of a difference than most people would think.

I think you will find (and I may be wrong), that the HKS step 1 kit does not come with conrods, the kit uses 121.5mm rods, so you use your old ones.

Also, all 3 cranks (step 1, 2 and 3) are different, but I believe they are all 12 counter types.

The Tomei RB28 kit includes Arrow rods but uses an 8 counter crank (from the Z tune)

hi mik, ive found that depending on who supplys the kit, most kits come with rods. The only place i found that sold the kit with no rods is Xspeed in Perth.

so is a 12 counter better than an 8 counter? I dont know a whole lot about cranks and only since investigating these kits was the first time id ever heard of a full counterweight crank.

according to the HKS website the step 2 kit is just crank, pistons and rings and is 498 000 yen retail (tax exclusive for use outside japan). the step 3 kit is crank, rods and pistons and rings and is 950 000 yen retail.

it gets frustrating when once source of reliable information says one thing, and another reliable source says another!

heres what nengun offers from HKS, all with rods

HKS 2.8L Kit Step 1 Rated 441kW(600ps)

Compression ratio (Gasket Size)

* 8.70 (t=1.2mm)

* 8.4 (t=1.6mm)

* 8.1 (t=2.0mm)

Parts Included

- Forged piston kit

- Fully forged & balanced counter crankshaft.

-H cross section connecting rods.

* To cylinder block and baffle plate et cetera

Escaping processing becomes necessary.

HKS 2.8L Kit Step 2 Rated 588kW(800ps)

Compression ratio (Gasket Size)

* 8.70 (t=1.2mm)

* 8.4 (t=1.6mm)

* 8.1 (t=2.0mm)

- Forged piston kit (nickel plated & piston surface has a final molybdenum coating).

- Fully forged & balanced counter crankshaft.

-H cross section connecting rods.

* To cylinder block and baffle plate et cetera

Escaping processing becomes necessary.

HKS 2.8L Kit Step 3 Rated 882kW(1200ps)

Compression ratio (Gasket Size)

* 8.70 (t=1.2mm)

* 8.4 (t=1.6mm)

* 8.1 (t=2.0mm)

- Forged piston kit (nickel plated & piston surface has a final molybdenum coating).

- Fully forged & balanced counter crankshaft.

- H cross section connecting rods.

* To cylinder block and baffle plate et cetera

Escaping processing becomes necessary.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...