Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey,

I had a small ding on my door and a tiny bit on my front panel from a hit and runner that I finally decided to get fixed. I took it to a panel shop close by and got a quote for $675 if I paid cash. I take the car in Monday morning and am assured I will have it for the weekend.

Friday 4:30 comes around and I get a call saying they have realised the colour is a 3 layer pearl job (the car is bayside blue) and it will take longer. They say I should have been quoted closer to 1500 and it will take till Monday.

They call Monday at 4:30 eight days after I took it in and say that it will be the $675.

I go and pick up my car just as the panel shop was closing and when I got home I notice that there is a drip at the bottom of the door, and also there is a tiny bit where the paint wasn’t done properly near the fold of the front panel where it meets the door.

At a glance it looks like a good job, but I really was expecting it to be a quality job as the place had all those banners saying there were approved by all the big insurance companies.

They also drove my car 2km when I specifically told them not to drive the car out of the business yard because I had a blown turbo gasket.

I am going to take it in tomorrow morning before my appointment at a performance workshop and see what they have to say.

Is it reasonable of me to expect a clean quality job? And for them to not drive my car around?

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/92325-just-had-some-paintwork-done/
Share on other sites

It is 100% reasonable, just have a nice chat to them they will probably fix it up for you, if they refuse well you will have to fight it out.

i find that you usually have to stress the fact that you want a perfect job and you WILL be unsatisfied if anything is wrong before they start.

I would be pissed if they drove my car more than they had to, i would expect a couple of hundred metres at most when moving it around every day but not a few km..

when u say that they sed 675 cash, does that mean without a receipt? or did they give u one

if they did give u have a very good leg to stand on to get it redone properly

if not u may be fighting a battle

one thing i always do if i take my car somewhere is do somethin like unplug the ecu or set a rev limit... take out the afm or even the plug on the afm. stops they from driving it or doin anything u dont want them doin

Usually if you are nice about it they will fix it up for you. I've had cars back to panel shops and when they realise their error they are quick to fix it up for you if they value your business.

If you go back there and swear and cause a big fuss straight away theyre not going to want to help you.

One full week also isn't really that much when you're asking for a cash job. To give you a cheap cash price they put your car at the low end of their priorities list. Some guys on the forums have had 4 - 6 week waits for paint. This is doubly evident since they didnt even realise the paint would require more work until Friday arvo.

As for the driving around - thats kind of unecessary - but if they were having to move the car all week to on-street parking like a lot of busy paint shops do it couldve clocked up the 2k's just driving up and down the street they're on looking for free spots.

Went in this morning and they said they will redo it, really happy about that.

Seems like a bad way to run a business, could have just done it properly the first time.

I was given a reciept for the "cash job"

Because they said they would fix it up right away i decided not to mention the 2km on the clock. When I take it back I am going to write on a post-it note that I know the km and to not drive it out of the yard, and stick it on the dash.

Edited by tdawg

man i hate these places that do lousy jobs, go back there and tell them to fix it up

i get places driving my car around and put excessive k's on it. i havnt really bothered in taking note of k's but next time i will and if they drive it im cracking the shits

2k's is a fair way to drive a car. i wouldnt expect them to have to move it that much and would be very sceptical about their resoning if they gave me one.

as for the shoddy work i would definetly be back there looking for some answers. you payed good money for a job that you expected to be well done and of top quality. i wouldnt expect any less

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks for the reply mate. Well I really hope its a hose then not engine out job
    • But.... the reason I want to run a 60 weight is so at 125C it has the same viscosity as a 40 weight at 100C. That's the whole reason. If the viscosity changes that much to drop oil pressure from 73psi to 36psi then that's another reason I should be running an oil that mimics the 40 weight at 100C. I have datalogs from the dyno with the oil pressure hitting 73psi at full throttle/high RPM. At the dyno the oil temp was around 100-105C. The pump has a 70psi internal relief spring. It will never go/can't go above 70psi. The GM recommendation of 6psi per 1000rpm is well under that... The oil sensor for logging in LS's is at the valley plate at the back of  the block/rear of where the heads are near the firewall. It's also where the knock sensors are which are notable for 'false knock'. I'm hoping I just didn't have enough oil up top causing some chatter instead of rods being sad (big hopium/copium I know) LS's definitely heat up the oil more than RB's do, the stock vettes for example will hit 300F(150C) in a lap or two and happily track for years and years. This is the same oil cooler that I had when I was in RB land, being the Setrab 25 row oil cooler HEL thing. I did think about putting a fan in there to pull air out more, though I don't know if that will actually help in huge load situations with lots of speed. I think when I had the auto cooler. The leak is where the block runs to the oil cooler lines, the OEM/Dash oil pressure sender is connected at that junction and is what broke. I'm actually quite curious to see how much oil in total capacity is actually left in the engine. As it currently stands I'm waiting on that bush to adapt the sender to it. The sump is still full (?) of oil and the lines and accusump have been drained, but the filter and block are off. I suspect there's maybe less than 1/2 the total capacity there should be in there. I have noticed in the past that topping up oil has improved oil pressure, as reported by the dash sensor. This is all extremely sketchy hence wanting to get it sorted out lol.
    • I neglected to respond to this previously. Get it up to 100 psi, and then you'll be OK.
    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
×
×
  • Create New...