Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

F****ng cops dont need a Saab to attend an accident or roadworks.

There must be someone out there whos meant to justify all those types of things? He was probably on lunch when they bought the Saab

Theres an orange Suzuki Jimmy (i think thats what theyre called) outside Cronulla Police station most days, it must be the resident bush/beach basher

Hey.I saw a blue wrx police car parked outside of livo hospital on wednsday.It had the police stripe arround the lower half of the car.

There getting around i style allright.

The thing that got me was that i had heard they had stoped driving wrx's or so i thought till the other day.

Edited by Trust33

Most of the weird cop cars such as the Saab are donated to the police force for various reasons such as this one from Victoria:

http://www.drive.com.au/editorial/article.aspx?id=3666&vf=1

But if you think thats weird, check out what some cops get to drive in Italy: Gallardo cop car :)

Lucky bastards

Edited by shyster
  • 3 weeks later...

they have a few beetles at bondi beach police station, and all the smart car patrol cars are based at the police station behind darling harbour across from where sega world used to be. I only see them in use in the city area... they are gay lol.

like you guys reckon a smart car would keep up with one of our skylines???

bwahahahaha

that wuld b soo funny....

yeh they get all this money and spend it on a new Saab or a WRX which they cruise with and act like fully sick bro, hard couz yeh bro, bwahahahahaha

Check this one out, Down in Cronulla  :lol:

Apparently on Monday morning I heard of the scanner that a police crew in a form of a "4WD" unmarked pulled over a 1989 White Skyline (R32 I reckon).

It was unrego'ed and belonged to a business that didnt exist.

The driver and passenger were taken into a paddy wagon and take to Miranda station.

As I heard this i was like wtf.. 4WD? wrx? now the pictures tells me that it too was a real 4wd ! Probably didnt get marked untill a few days ago.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...