Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

out of interest: here's a "pre mods" power run. 198.5 rwkw.

spec:

pod

full 3" exhaust (BATMBL split dump/front/cat and Blitz cat-back)

gt2876r hybrid turbo as above

turbotech bc running ~11PSI

everything else = stock

it's obviously running pretty rich and i guess bumping into the R&R from the stock ecu?

anyway should be interesting once everything's done. waiting for the powerFC to arrive then the fun begins. final spec will be:

pod

full 3" exhaust

gt2876r hybrid

14-16 PSI

powerFC

blitz LM FMIC

bosch 040 pump

nismo 480cc injectors

Z32 afm if needed

who knows what power. i think anywhere between 230 and 260 is a good guess. a nice chunky torque curve is what i'm after. :D thanks for your opinions too guys, it'll be interesting to see how this turbo goes.

EDIT: forgot about 040...

post-17890-1133454434.jpg

Edited by jmac
  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

well i think it's pretty good. coming on strong by 3500rpm. hard to subjectively say though not having felt the characteristics of anyone else's. to me it's not that much laggier than the std turbo. so frustrating cos just as it starts to boogie you can feel the ecu freaking out and pulling the spark out... ;)

I 'THINK' not know. :S the difference between this and say a GT3076R (same comp wheel larger turbine wheel) would be that the GT3076R will make less boost at the lower rpm's. In other words it will snap on a little harder, the GT2876R being a little more progressive and offer more boost at lower rpm's.

I think... maybe you can confirm that it does? Where does it start to make boost?

There was an R33 with a GT28 (I don't know the specs) at our last dyno day, that made a solid 245rwkw.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...opic=87573&st=0

Edited by Cubes

I'll be able to give you a definitive answer next week - PowerFC arrived today and have booked the tuner+dyno for Monday. :lol: Will post any graphs I can lay my hands on!

At the moment it's beginning to spool at 3200rpm and really gives you a fair shove in the back at 3500rpm... Boost gauge reads 11PSI. Then at about 4500rpm (especially in 1st and 2nd gears) the ECU spoils the party.

So once I get this sorted properly with the PFC and the injectors that're sitting on my coffee table at the moment I'll post and try to describe how it goes as best I can. :)

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok so had some tuning done today. There are still some issues with the car in its current state:

- AFM maxing out to 5.0V (Z32 AFM on the way)

- boost spike from Turbotech BC (PowerFC boost control kit on the way)

But otherwise here's the spec:

No-name-brand pod filter

MTQ GT2876R hybrid

Blitz LM FMIC

Bosimporting split 3" dump

Catco 3" metal cat

Blitz 3" Nur Spec cat-back

Apexi PFC

Turbotech BC

Bosch 040

Nismo 480cc injectors

Result was 226.5 rwkW. The tuner thinks there's a bit more in it but we need better boost control and better AFM resolution to get there.... which is kinda what I *thought* might happen. ;)

As for what it's like to drive, well... it's FUN, especially that lovely spot at 3500rpm where everything starts to happen. From that point on it's linear and IMO spools quickly. It's got HEAPS more midrange than before which is what I was after.

Just gotta wait for the bits to arrive so I can get this 100% where I'd like it....

Comments etc welcome!

post-17890-1134991353.jpg

post-17890-1134991387.jpg

post-17890-1134991417.jpg

Looking very nice...

I see that boost spike as it comes on - maybe not ideal? Did that cause any tuning problems?

Also interesting to see how you have a very wide plateau of max power; what does the shape of the torque curve look like? and how does it feel in the higher revs beyond that 3500rpm point?

Also is there any feeling of lacking response or engine flexibility right down low (eg. trickling along in 3rd or 4th @ 1800rpm and squeeze the throttle) compared to stock?

You should be happy overall at this point though.

cheers

Speaking to Paul this arve the spike itself didn't cause problems, it's the adjustment of the actual little Turbotech valve that was problematic - half a turn takes you from 10PSI to 17PSI...

Initially we ran into problems, kinda like a random misfire/stutter between 4000-5000 rpm. Apparently my coils are ok and it has a new set of plugs so the likely thing is maxing out the AFM.

If it persists I'll go for the Spitfires anyway, but first I think the Z32 AFM and boost control kit should go in and see how it runs then.

The torque curve was very broad and flat too. Didn't get a printout (dynos are not the best at measuring this apparently?). Yeah after the turbo spools if just feels linear, power builds progressively. Things can get a bit out of hand in 1st gear but I mostly hold traction in 2nd - the sticky tyres help!!!

So I'm happy with the result, but not 100% happy overall yet! :blink:

you should see some pretty good numbers once the boost kit goes in.

Keep that boost nice and flat, and once the fuel gets sorted out, you can start winding in some boost and making seom decent numbers.....

Farkin..... Having anohter look, if your graph is right, you are making at 100kph, you are making over 200 rwkw...... I don't make that until 135, so boost sure as hell comes on early.....

But, runs are done in third gear that's why.

Ok, reading between the lines it does come on like an animal and then predictable and obviously fast? I do have to agree there is plenty of meat, very early in the curve. Please give us an idea of what it's like in on/off throttle driving.

Bass how similar to your turbo is this unit (apologies if there's comment on this earlier in the thread)?

cheers

Dale

I haven't felt any power loss at low revs or on low throttle openings. And during on-off throttle driving it spools quickly, you're not left waiting for 2-3 seconds for the power to come back on. The main thing is if you're going for it then keep the revs above 3000.... but it's not annoying or laggy to drive in "normal" situations at all.

Thanks jmac. It's good to see you're satisfied with the result to this point. There are many instances where the modifications lead you to having to keep the revs up or down just to avoid lag and/or the massive rush as it all comes on too strong.

My view is that besides being strong, it still has to be streetable (tractable) and not threaten to light the bags/snap sideways any time you squeeze the throttle coming off a roundabout or turning a street corner.

Probably showing my age, and preference for OEM style power delivery, but I have strong recollections (as a spectator) of the Group A Ford Sierra Cosworth RS being "challenging" to drive around windy tracks. That of course was one reason the GTR became so dominant with the level of traction available. :cheers:

Bass what is your level of satisfaction with your setup and power level?

cheers

Edited by Dale FZ1

Dale,

My car is a joy to drive. you can trundle along, getting passed by grannies, without a problem at all. All it takes to make things blur is a downchange to whatever gear 4000rpm is and a bootful of throttle.

I build boost in no time and have a 4000rpm wide power band.

It doesn't brake traction either. Just get's the hell out of there!

My feelings are pretty similar to Bass Junky's. I feel it's about 90% of the way there in terms of the tune but basically it's a versatile car to drive. Keep things below 3000rpm and drive like a Sane Person and it's a relaxing car, with good throttle response and reserves of low-speed torque. Kick it up the arse and yes, there is a "stepped" power delivery at about 3500rpm when it spools but it's not wild and doesn't produce clouds of smoke in anything other than 1st gear.

During the process of doing these mods the point at which it lost a little throttle response was fitting the FMIC. That was one thing I definitely noticed.

Quick question - the misfire I mentioned above is still present but only at 4000 -5000 rpm and only on WOT in 2nd and 3rd. The AFM is definitely maxing out to approx 5000mV but is there any chance this is a coil problem? Visually they look fine (I've seen some stuffed ones off an R33) but I remain suspicious given the descriptions in the coils thread sound exactly like what my car does.

The PFC is not logging big knock values but of course is logging that 5000mV ceiling on the AFM.

I hope it's the AFM... it didn't misfire on the dyno at all, only on the road - maybe because you're sucking more air on the road cos the fan unit they use at the dyno doesn't give you a similar volume of air?

What do you reckon guys? Or is it odds on I'll be stumping up for Splitfires soon? :D

Hope y'all had a good xmas. Cheers!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...