Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello All

I have a 1995 GTS-t RB25DET Auto

with th following mods

3'' full exhaust with dump pipe

GCG 450hp Hi flow Turbo

Pod Filter

Hybrid FMIC

Splitfire Coils

FCD

10 PSi Boost

18 degrees timing

My tuner cant seem to get much more then 210hp at the wheels

my ecu is doing the Rich and Retard thing its driving me nuts

What is my options for a ECU for the AUTO or do i go for a full ecu and do a manual conversion.

I would prefer to keep the Auto cause its nice to drive (my missus has to drive it too....with kids....)

I was hoping with startard injectors to hit 250-300hp at the wheels

but it seems that the damm ecu wont let me.

I have been searching the forums for weeks trying to find a clear cut answer to no avail.

Guys i know someone out there can help me

no matter what it still has to retain drivibilty.

HELLLLLLLLLLLLP!

Champ get a compresion test some thing is wrong

i get 242rwhp @ 8psi

mods i have

3' exhaust with hiflow cat hiflow turbo

pod

fmic with plumb back

eboost 2 at 10psi 250rwhp all day

tho my dyno guy was very suprised

you need a g reddy e manage with ignision harnes there is a good thread on hear

james

Champ get a compresion test some thing is wrong

i get 242rwhp @ 8psi

mods i have

3' exhaust with hiflow cat hiflow turbo

pod

fmic with plumb back

eboost 2 at 10psi 250rwhp all day

tho my dyno guy was very suprised

you need a g reddy e manage with ignision harnes there is a good thread on hear

james

sorry wrong message quoted.

Can you point me to that thread mate I cant find much with the search funtionalty

cheers

Speak to a guy on these forums called toshi

He remaps rb25 ecu's. This means he will write a new map for your standard computer so you will retain factory auto settings.

cost is something like $300 + dyno time from memory :blink:

he has done heaps of ECUs and knows what he is doing

Cheers:)

PMDW

some thing is wrong with your dyno results

they are soo low i hav less mods than you and push wat you are after without an ecu auto as well that is y your thread interests me

was the car in second gear wen dynoed?

is it serviced much?

is it a good operater?

how long have you had it?

james

james

he is running a bigger turbo... there is probably nothing wrong at all.

@ 10psi his bigger turbo is more than likely moving more air, spinning out the ECU more than yours.

I wouldnt worry about the figure at all.

Get an SAF-C II onto it and go from there

R31Nismoid

Dont you think 210HP not KW is a little low for the mods he has

and will a bigger turbo lower the over all HP

I thought they just lagged more

210 hp =150 kw @rw

sorry i think some thing is up with that

james

he is running a bigger turbo... there is probably nothing wrong at all.

@ 10psi his bigger turbo is more than likely moving more air, spinning out the ECU more than yours.

I wouldnt worry about the figure at all.

Get an SAF-C II onto it and go from there

Actually you are right on the money the more airflow is maxing out the ECU

I have pretty much decided to get my factory ECU remapped when the nismo injectors turn up that way i dont have to dick around with splicing looms and such and everything will work smiko i'm hoping for 230 to 240 rwkw fingers crossed and it will still look factory i'll keep everyone posted.

Thanks for pointing me to that e-manage thread mad34 and the factory ECU IS the way to go.CEF11E cheers mate its gunna save a lot of heartache

R31Nismoid

Dont you think 210HP not KW is a little low for the mods he has

and will a bigger turbo lower the over all HP

I thought they just lagged more

210 hp =150 kw @rw

sorry i think some thing is up with that

james

Miller, the stock ecu sucks, they are not all equal.

Nothing is wrong with his car.

plus its auto also... you loose a good 10rwkw in stock form... more power you put in the more your going to loose :P

but yeah, get some management and then re-asses whats going on as currently you cant really get a good idea.

If something is wrong you could spend ages looking and not find it as there are too many things with a bigger turbo and stock ECU.

Get tuning in there and post up the results.

I'd be interested to see what comes of it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have you not seen geospy.ai? It can now give GPS co ords to within a metre from a photo, even if it's a random photo you take inside. Supposedly at the moment only the government/law enforcement has access to that... Supposedly...
    • I've got the rear ones, they're certainly beefy. I need to take them to my driveshaft guru to check over, he's very fussy about the quality of components so I'll let you know if they are made of cheese by a blind man.   Are you in Australia? A mate just had a set of EN26 shafts made for his K20 Lotus by our fabricator which were quite cheap (compared to Driveshaft Shop) so if you can procure the CV's and draw what you need he'd make them for ~$800 for the pair.
    • Had I known the diff between R32 and R33 suspension I would have R33 suspension. That ship has sailed so I'm doing my best to replicate a drop spindle without spending $4k on a Billet one.
    • OEM suspension starts to bind as soon as the car gets away from stock height. I locked in the caster and camber before cutting off the kingpin. I then let the upright down in a natural (unbound) state before re-attaching it. Now it moves freely in bump and droop relative to the new ride height. My plan is to add GKTech arms before the car is finished so I can dial camber and caster further. It will be fine. This isn't rocket science. Caster looks good, camber is good, upper arm doesn't cause crazy gain and it is now closer to the stock angle and bump steer checks out. Send it.
    • Pay careful attention to the kinematics of that upper arm. The bloody things don't work properly even on a normal stock height R32. Nissan really screwed the pooch on that one. The fixes have included changing the hole locations on the bracket to change the angle of the inner pivot (which was fairly successful but usually makes it impossible to install or remove the arm without unbolting the bracket from the tower, which sucks) and various swivelling upper arm designs. ALL the swivelling upper arm designs that look like a capital I (with serifs) suck. All of them. Some of them are in fact terribly unsafe. Even the best one of them (the old UAS design) shat itself in short order on my car. The only upper arm that works as advertised and is pretty safe is the GKTech one. But it is high maintenance on a street car. I'm guessing that a 600HP car as (stupidly, IMO) low as you are going is not going to be a regular driver. So the maintenance issues on suspension parts are probably not going to be a problem. But you really must make sure that however your fairly drastically modded suspension ends up, that the upper arms swing through an arc that wants to keep the inner and outer bolts parallel. If the outer end travels through an arc that makes that end's bolt want to skew away from parallel with the inner bolt, you will build up enormous binding and compressing forces in the bushes, chew them out and hate life. The suspension compliance can actually be dominated by the bush binding, not the spring rate! It may be the case that even something like the GKTech arm won't work if your suspension kinematics become too weird, courtesy of all the cut and shut going on. Although you at least say there's no binding now, so maybe you're OK. Seeing as you're in the build phase, you could consider using R33/4 type upper arms (either that actual arm, OEM or aftermarket) or any similar wishbone designed to suit your available space, so alleviate the silliness of the R32 design. Then you can locate your inner pivots to provide the correct kinematics (camber gain on compression, etc).
×
×
  • Create New...