Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

well.. ive got an OS giken twin plate (TS2CD) and im pulling it out as its rooted. When it was working i thought it was a great clutch, fair bit of play in the pedal (feels almost stock but heavy). Bites very hard when u let it go. But now its slipping and starting to stick gears. So in goes a 5 puck brass button daiken plate (single). Should be good.

Oh and if anyone wants my TS2CD (www.otomoto.com.au) then PM offers.

peace

Edited by Mumbo#5

I have the Nismo Gmax 2 Twin plate in mine. I also upgrade the Clutch line (Nismo Braided) and the Clutch slave cylinder (Nismo Enlarged slave cylinder). Clutch is lighter than the stock one now, easy to use, suprising almost silent (no rattle) and really bites when you need it to. Couldn't be happier.

jlnewton: So the nismo twin has no rattle? The HKS twin makes a bit of noise and I regulary have to think twice as to whether somethings lose, even though I know it isn't.

What clutch did you end up going with anyway SkylineSII?

I just installed my HKS 5 plate titanium clutch with a 6200lbs pressure plate and I am having trouble pushing the pedal in....can anyone help?

You are going to snap stuff :(

jlnewton: So the nismo twin has no rattle? The HKS twin makes a bit of noise and I regulary have to think twice as to whether somethings lose, even though I know it isn't.

What clutch did you end up going with anyway SkylineSII?

Yeah, its really quiet. Can't even tell its a twin. I hear the new Nismo coppermix Twin is the same and even more drivable.

I just installed my HKS 5 plate titanium clutch with a 6200lbs pressure plate and I am having trouble pushing the pedal in....can anyone help?

Perhaps a gym to work up leg muscles :lol:

Chris went with a Exedy Single plate 5 puk button clutch.

I've got a OS Giken Twin Plate & it hasn't given me any problems. I know it's a Grabby MF, but I have learned to drive it properly & once you know where & when it grabs you shouldn't have a issue. I saw a post on here about someones OS Giken being rated at 480bhp?,

My one, I think is about 600HP or more, are you sure this is right. Because if mine is rated at 480hp, I might be looking to change sooner than I thought (it's only 7000km old) becasue my car is now at 500hp (300RWKW) at the flywheel (OS Giken Flywheel)).

When my car is finished in about 6 weeks,- it will put out 400rwkw, with a small shot of NOS, so I will be careful.

If any of you guys know what a good strong replacement is, I don't really care about it being grabby please let me know, because I am a bit worried now, but not too worried, so i will check my specs sheet again.

Cheers

Chris

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...