Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Originally posted by RAIDER

hoping to get cooler and computer installed this weekend

ouch to the bank account!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

i been told to expect 200rwkw

yeah right  

will just have to wait and see

i went to see a few workshops today and asked what it takes to get 200kw@wheels for s15. The answer is you need a bigger turbo (T28 maxed out at 187kw @ 1.2bar), bigger injectors, and ECU on top of the usual first stage mod (FMIC, full exhaust, airfilter, EBC)

Sorry Nick,

Your rite champ, i heard its impossible to get over 200kw @ wheels even with a computer of some sought. This could just be the workshops way of saying "buy a bigger turbo from us"

They say standard r33 turbos with all other mods will not net 200kw @ wheels,

But yeh, his chip is some weird ass jap brand, (century 21 or something)

hehehehe, only a piggy back though, can't wait to show it off to you guys :) (the car that is , not the comp)

Donnie

Originally posted by jtir

The 4WD Dyno Dynamics seem to produce lower outputs compared to many other brands.

Not saying there is anything wrong with optimistic outputs :)

the dyno guys can make a car have as much power as they want it to have.

this one reads high figures

for best results compare your car on a few dynos and average

them out.

:)

Judd...

Every single dyno measures air/fuel ratios... without measuring that, you wouldn't know whether you're running lean or not and could damage your engine by continuing the power run.

That said, your friend will probably have to wait until the end of the day if he wanted any tuning to be done, as this is a dyno day, not a tuning day... Having his car tuned will just make everyone else wait...

Cheers,

Andrew.

It's a 2WD dyno.

Nick his car made 192 on this dyno so it's not unreasonable to expect him to make an 8kW gain from the mods he has performed.

Really, you know better than to make silly blanket statements like that.

Adrian

Pardon me Adrian?

Dont acuse me of making "Blanket" statements you idiot.

I made a direct point about the power figures that individuals believed they could attain with a stock ecu and stock turbine. I mentioned that what Ben was quoting power wise would likely be attiributed to a chipped/modified or aftermarket ECU - something than benm believed was a possiblilty.

Good work moron.

Guys, this is brendanf the NSW mod here (not brendanf the SAU member)

Let's keep things nice hey ? - Everyone is allowed their own opinions, but lets keep the personal attacks out of it please. We are all brutha's

Schweet :):D

Originally posted by jtir

The 4WD Dyno Dynamics seem to produce lower outputs compared to many other brands.

Not saying there is anything wrong with optimistic outputs :P

i went to C & V this morning to tune my car, and it made 190kw @ 4 wheels, they use 4wd dyno dynamics... my car made 376hp at the rears on col perry automotive's 2wd dyno dynamics in penrith last year :D




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is for an RB20DET. Sorry for not including that. 
    • Welp, this is where my compression lands after my rebuild. Thoughts? I have ~6 hours on the motor. 
    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
×
×
  • Create New...