Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I've had my r33 for about a year now, just wondering about

getting a -little- more power out of it. everything is stock on it except for a k&n inbox air filter (wet), and boosted to 10psi.

Currently is 149.7rwkw. Is there anything more I can do, without changing intercooler, turbo, exhaust, filter, ecu, re-map fuel, etc.

just to sqeeze a little bit more out of it --- rwkw 170's maybe...

Thanks,

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9582-need-more-power/
Share on other sites

Well, you could try a full port and polish, cams and cam gears... but why dont you want to do the normal things most people do when after a little bit more - there is a reason that people follow that path.

I would personally think of 20rwkw as a reasonably significant gain in power.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9582-need-more-power/#findComment-146164
Share on other sites

I don't mind spending a few hundred, but not a few 000.

i would'nt mind getting at cat back exh, but the gf will complain - I used to have an r31 b4 this one, with had a cat back sports - she drove me nuts with complaints 'bout headaches...

I don't wanna touch the motor, and don't wanna spend 000's on new turbo's, intercoolers, powerfc's...just wanna little more kick...

was reading some forums the other day, and a member (can't remember who?) - his avator was something like stock everything, 10psi and something crazy like ~180rwkw???

just wanted to know what he did...I'm a bit of a newbie when it comes to this sort of stuff - may seem like a silly question - but what a pineapples??? - have heard them in forums. he also mentioned something about factory ecu & connecting something to it (safc???)

thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9582-need-more-power/#findComment-146381
Share on other sites

1995 R33 GTS-T

67,000km

3" Cat back Nismo Exhaust

HKS Pod Filter

FMIC

EBC

(Possibly chipped ECU but no proof)

7psi - 168rwkw

12psi - 192rwkw

If you want abit more oomph get a full 3" Exhaust System. Should cost you around $800ish and if you get a decent type/brand they really aren't loud. A mate had an R31 and it was SOOO loud i'd get a headache after 2km but the propper exhausts are seriously quiet.

Their is quite abit of restriction in the stock exhaust system so your sure to gain those extra rwkw's that your after.

If you want to know what Pineapples are read my review here

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9582-need-more-power/#findComment-146396
Share on other sites

Thanks guys for all your help...if U think of anything else pls let me know...might go the 3" cat back jobbie for now - if there is a lot a restriction in the stock exh, then this might do the trick...

just as an estimate, how many rwkw's might I get just going cat back? If it's resonably quiet like U say, the gf shouldn't have noth'in to complain 'bout!!! - can someone recommend a good place to get this exh or price it??? - I've got a local guy, but don't know if he's on the money...what about nizpro in bayswater???

thanx.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9582-need-more-power/#findComment-146422
Share on other sites

I've got a mod that won't get you any power, but won't cost you a cent! What it will do though is allow further mod's down the track.......

It's called the no more g/f mod :wave: Sorry, couldn't help it!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9582-need-more-power/#findComment-146918
Share on other sites

Try around the local haunts and keep getting your car dynod at different places until you find one that reads high, and presto 170rwkws:D

Ive heard some people removing the wire mesh from their airflow meter for a few Kws, but power costs money even when you can do things yourself.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9582-need-more-power/#findComment-146990
Share on other sites

why don't you remove as much stuffs as you can out of your car ie lightened it?

spare tyres, sound system, air con, carpets, sound deadening etc...:D:)

and oh yeah lose some weight yourself, probably makes money out of the craps you took out of your car for more meaning mods.. :rolleyes:

just my 2c...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9582-need-more-power/#findComment-147318
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...