Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello,

Im from the USA. I drive a 240sx (known as the 180sx or 200sx over there to you guys) I want to do a front end conversion on my car with r32 parts. Fenders, Hood, Headlights, OEM bumper, etc. I did a search and scanned about 150 posts by now.... ive not really come up with good solid answers.

Has there been any modifications through the years of the r32 styling wise?

I know the gt-r had the motorized front lip, otherwhise is the bumper different at all?

I hear people talk about the different headlights gtr, etc. What exactly is the difference between the different headlights? did all r32s come with projectors? is there a difference between the h3c/h1 projectors?

Is there any difference with the fenders? (besides the logo on the side)

What about cross fitment collecting parts? (i.e. will I be able to use gtr headlights with a gts-t hood/fenders/bumper other way around etc. with no difference or some modification?)

I appreciate any and all constructive replies. Alot of people either love it or hate it and I dont want to debate that here, I like the look, its fairly simple and fairly inexpensive, its also my choice and my car. please respect that. Thank you for your help...

please correct me If i'm wrong

As or the motorized front lip wing, it came out on other models as well, I have one on mine i think it is a M-spec bar.

GT-R bonnets, I believe the only difference from a GTSt (for example) to a GTR is the metal used. I think it is Alunimum on the GTR. So you should be able to use GTR headlight with GTSt bonnet. But you will have to look into the front bumper issues, some 32s have no grill and just a extra big lip ontop of front bumper.

As for fenders/guards they will all bolt onto each 32 model, as for silvia i don't know. you should ask this same question at Nissansilvia.com

I have seen a S13 Silvia with a R32 front end, just can't recal where.

The GTR bumper is the one to go for, it is much more aggressive, and have a large opening for a front mount intercooler etc. The gtst bar is much more boring. The gtr bar is a little bit wider, but some people here have fitted it to a gtst with a small amount of modification.

The headlights are the same between the gtst and gtr, but the gts indicators are wider.

The gtr fenders (or front guards) are aluminium and are wider, and fit up to the wider gtr indicators and front bar perfectly. All the fenders had the gt badge on the side, non-turbo models have a blue badge whilst the turbo ones have a red badge.

Where in the US are you from? Im of to Colorado on monday to do a ski season of work.

ok where do i start.

GTR bonnet is different to the GTST in two ways. 1 GTR bonnet is aluminium, 2 GTR bonnet does not curve around at the front.

GTR guard are different in 2 ways also. 1 they are wider and more curved than GTST guard, 2. they are aluminium

the GTR bumper DOES NOT HAVE A MOTORISED lip. this was an option on some GTSTs.

the GTR bumper is competely different to a GTST, it is wider, and has much larger ducts and also has a much lower front lip (which is seperate to the bar).

GTR headlights are different where they meet the grill

GTR indicators are different (they are wider)

GTR grill is different to GTST.

GTR bonnet catch is different to GTST too.

I don't think it will really be a cheap conversion. maybe go for an S13 silvia front end? it's a similar kind of look (well more so than the pop-up headlights front end you have now).

actually the r32 front is about 350$ USD cheaper for me to do than a silvia front, and going strawberry face is several thousand usd more! the r32 front is seen alot less, putting the s15 front on your s13 over here is common practice, the r32 front is more affordable for me, imho sexy, and something a little more challenging/different. Alot of the people who have done the front end have done a piss poor job on it, but my father owns a bodyshop and ive got aaaaallllll winter to get it perfect :-).

The skyline front is ALMOST a bolt on affair, only thing with it is that it is wider than the stock s13 front when bolted on in gts-t AND gtr form so you have to try to tuck things in a bit so it doesnt look out of place. Other than that redrill the fender holes and make a headlight mounting bracket. thats 90% of getting it on, the rest is really finess to make it mint.

Over in the us we have different slang. Let me know if what it sounds like im seeing is correct

indicators=corner lamps

bonnet = hood

bar= front bumper lower lip/add on ground fx? this is the one I have the most trouble with.

as far as the hood/fenders. how much weight does it save going with a gtr hood? is it worth going with a carbon fiber hood or should I save the money and just use a gtr one? the grill in the front I believe I read attaches to the gtr headlights so I know thats different, does anyone have any pictures of where it meets? Maybe I can fabricate a bracket.

how does the latch differ on the gtr vs the gtst? relocated/different type?

Thanks everyone for humoring me and helping me out on this. I want to be well informed and prepared on this so I can do a proper job.

xrhettx Im from massachusetts

Maybe I will go with a gts-t bumper and gtr hood-grill-headlights-fenders if I can get ahold of them. aluminum doesnt rust which is a very good thing on a car in my area. yea this isnt gonna be a show car for me at all, its a daily driver/auto-x that will never see a show.

oh and for the curious heres one persons conversion job done right. You can see however that he used gtr parts and it made the front hang down a bit too low not matching the already lowering bodywork from the kit.

8076sky80.jpg

Edited by tastyratz

another question came up as well, sorry to be bothering you guys with all this but its really helpful. factory fog lights.... are they any different for gts/gtr bumpers? I may be able to come across a set somewhere and I wanted to see if I should just pounce on them or if it matters if they are gts/gtr? thanks

GTR doesn't have any factory fog lights.

bar = bumper bar = front bumper

lower lip is the bit that attached to the bar

bonnet=hood

indicators=corner lamps

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...