Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

newkleer - download some of the chip reprogramming tools if you haven't already, and have a bit of a look through.

There is a universal "K" constant as part of the ECU, which can be used to apply more or less fueling across the board and is used to adjust for say larger injectors. One of the programs (I forget which) can automatically do it all for you, just depending on the injectors CC's you enter.

Also refer here...

http://www.boostcruising.com/silvia/eprom.asp

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

thanks for that. looks like what you would normally change the K value by is what you can apply via consult. but this bit im not sure if you could do anything about:

Also, I used the correction of 0.849 to all the values in the 'boost' section along the bottom of the fuel maps. You will find that once you adjust all those values, and then click Setup - Engine Specification setup, and adjust the Injector Blas-off quantity to the injector size that you are now using, all the values will come back to normal compared to the original map with uncorrected values and standard injector size spec).

that "blas-off" is what i was referring to as "opening time" - i guess it depends on how different they are as to whether its significant (and what the value is used for). perhaps 370->440 wouldnt be too bad, but issues with higher (eg 550)?

The k is the main multiply as most of you may already know.

It just richens or leans out the whole a/f's across the board of the fuel maps etc. For every number increase or decrease it will richen or lean out the overall fueling by 0.1 of a fuel ratio.

So up the k by 10 ( in dec) will up it by 1 afr.

The blast off time or void as its allso know as is the extra pulse width to the injectors that is added too the start and the finnish of the base pulswidth of the injector.

It barely effects the ratios up in the revs under load but it affect the mixture at idle quite dramticly.

For every number up or down it richens or leans out the A/f at idle by 0.1 of a ratio.

Just clearing a few things up with the stock ecu.

makes sense that higher duty cycle less impact the blast off time would have.

what do you think the result would be with leaving blast off time for the 370, while using 440 injectors? (assuming you fix the K via consult). would it idle well enough?

what percentage of typical idle injector pulse width is likely to be blast off time?

Sorry, I still don't get it.......let me try one question at a time.

My PDA still has ALL of my normal PDA functions...it is not just EcuXtend. When I leave the car I throw it in my bag. Same as i did before I had this ecuXtend software on it!!

What happens if you don't plug the PDA back in?

:D cheers :D

Hi Sydney Kid,

If you dont have the PDA plugged into the car, you car will simply run off the ecu's original settings.

With the PDA plugged in, you car car will use the setting you had when you turned it off.

Caz.. )

Sorry, I still don't get it.......let me try one question at a time.

What happens if you don't plug the PDA back in?

:D cheers :D

makes sense that higher duty cycle less impact the blast off time would have.

what do you think the result would be with leaving blast off time for the 370, while using 440 injectors? (assuming you fix the K via consult). would it idle well enough?

what percentage of typical idle injector pulse width is likely to be blast off time?

Not much I'd say. All it will do is run a little rich at idle.

From past experience all I did was Once I set up the K to run the correct afr under load etc I just adjusted the void to run the afr of 14.7:1 as it should be according to the fuel map correction values.

Just think of the void as an idle mixture setting.

have made a bit more progress on software, see attachment

need to add a digital reading to the bottom of the gauges, after i do that will try to make it able to go into "full screen", then move on to active tests. gauges were made so that the same gauge can be used in pocketpc app (hence why it looks a bit basic)

post-4553-1134907472.jpg

colours that make up the gauges would be easy to change (something id add later on), but the structure of the gauge itself would be harder to change. a background image would also be hard given the gauge sizes change depending on how many gauges you have (to maximise the amount of screen used for the gauges)

added digital value to gauges and made it full-screen-able (though not sure many people have car computers, but thought itd be good anyway to use up all screen real-estate)

have a list of todo things on my website, whats there should take long enough to do, but if theres any notable omissions of features i should look at let me know

post-4553-1135601413.jpg

  • 4 weeks later...

128%! weeee!

Lookin' good, Pete!

You know what i'd really LOVE?

1) To choose which and how many guages show up. (and for them to re-align depending on window/screen size)

2) To have the program start up and connect to the ECU automatically, and start monitoring, and in full-screen.

3) To show boost from the MAP sensor or something... it doesn't come through the consult port, does it?

Anyhoo... if those things existed, then I could finally justify building my car pc with a 7" widescreen touchscreen! =-D

1) does that :D

it automatically works out the best config (eg rows x cols) for the amount of gauges you have to maximise the amount of screen area the gauges take up. if u have 1 gauge itll be full screen for that single gauge, 4 and theyll take up roughly 1/4 screen each. on a widescreen with 6 then id have 2 rows of 3 gauges to fill it out nicely. so will take care of widescreens no probs!

2) good idea, ill add that to the list - would be good for anyone thats smart enough to get a car pc going :D

3) cant do that unfortunately, youll have to stick to traditional gauge for boost

Edited by NewKleer

Hmm... some excellent work, Pete! On a 7" wide, 3 across looks to be the goods!

I can live without the boost reading I guess. =-/

When is a beta available of your software?

Additionally... has anyone ever tried to emulate the R34's digital screen? I think it would be appealing. =-]

(especially if someone could mount the 7" widescreen in one of those triple-guage clusters that are moulded to look like the stock R34 cluster)

better to look at what each individual thing does then try and compare them like that

with consult you can view all of the cars main sensors, change fuel injection time/static ignition timing across the rev range (which ecuextend does can do all)

an safc has multiple mapping points (as opposed to the global change), but works on tricking the ecu into thinking there is more/less air then there really is, so the downside is that incorrect ignition timing is used (which with slight adjustments, hardly matters, but problems arise if ur trying to go from eg 9:1 afr up to 12:1)

and an rsm (i think) uses an accelerometer in order to measure acceleration, and thus speed, distance (which can be worked out with acceleration + time).

thus anything via consult and rsm/safc only have a single overlap in they both show RPM - slight overlap in that they display/work out speed (via different methods) and can change amount of fuel that goes in (via entirely different methods again).

Edited by NewKleer

Thanks NewKleer, :)

better to look at what each individual thing does then try and compare them like that

with consult you can view all of the cars main sensors, change fuel injection time/static ignition timing across the rev range (which ecuextend does can do all)

an safc has multiple mapping points (as opposed to the global change), but works on tricking the ecu into thinking there is more/less air then there really is, so the downside is that incorrect ignition timing is used (which with slight adjustments, hardly matters, but problems arise if ur trying to go from eg 9:1 afr up to 12:1)

and an rsm (i think) uses an accelerometer in order to measure acceleration, and thus speed, distance (which can be worked out with acceleration + time).

thus anything via consult and rsm/safc only have a single overlap in they both show RPM - slight overlap in that they display/work out speed (via different methods) and can change amount of fuel that goes in (via entirely different methods again).

I've been considering developing an ECU/PC interface and consult software for quite some time now. Reading this post has encouraged me to begin writing an application for the linux platform, mainly out of curiousity.

Which may or may not interest anyone on this forum, however if successful; linux would potentially allow me to offer a freely available in-dash ECU management + multimedia + navigation package, that will be able to take advantage of existing technology (i.e. mini-PC, touchscreen LCD, consult<->RS232 cable, GPS receiver)

For now though, it's still a pipe dream!

PS. Any idea where to read the G-sensor from the ECU? That'd be neat!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...