Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It could also be argued that that power figure looks a tad optimistic for an automatic RB25DET with the mods you have listed.

I thought my graph was optimistic until I saw this thread.

dyno.JPG

3 inch turbo back (stock cat)

FMIC

EBC

Pod

on Auto R33 GTS-T

It gave me 190+ (192 I think) but timing was all out so the setting on the EBC was put back a tad.

I'm contemplating a SAFC2 and I hope it will give me 195+.

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

This is an interesting thread

Security: Lets not mislead people into thinking that 50rwkw gains are achievable through the use of an S-AFC, especially on a car like yours that is virtually stock because they arent - end of story.

The ONLY way that you could find that much more power is if your car was running like absolute shite beforehand. The gain is not soley attritbuted to your S-AFC.

It could also be argued that that power figure looks a tad optimistic for an automatic RB25DET with the mods you have listed.

I'm thinking that his base timing was way off. Majorly retarded.

That's where the gains were had, I'm guessing.

Can someone explain how the timing or "base timing" as mentioned above can be changed? Last tune, only the SAFC was touched, nothing about timing at all - just wondering if this would help me squeeze past 200rwkw (only out by 5.4rwkw at the mo.)

Can someone explain how the timing or "base timing" as mentioned above can be changed?  Last tune, only the SAFC was touched, nothing about timing at all - just wondering if this would help me squeeze past 200rwkw (only out by 5.4rwkw at the mo.)

I think the only way to do it properly is a replacement or piggyback ECU.

Can someone explain how the timing or "base timing" as mentioned above can be changed?  Last tune, only the SAFC was touched, nothing about timing at all - just wondering if this would help me squeeze past 200rwkw (only out by 5.4rwkw at the mo.)

Base timing can be checked with a timing light.

It is adjusted by turning the CAS.

hmmmm picture's would help ay...

I have 255rwhp in an auto and you cant compare it to a manual

and 50rwkws could be gain if it was running like shit on 92 oct

and serviced air leaks fixxed 98oct and a border line good tune close to blow up

sit am wondering the psi run

turbo mabe hiflowed

james

well Nick, if you read my post properly it says he played with my timing also.

apparently my timing was off to begin with.

he advanced it half way through the tune when it reached around 168kw and it jumped to 184kw.

my point of this thread is that he actually picked this up. not only did he tune my safc, he also fixed my timing problem. its for that reason i thought i had to post this thread... he definately knows his cars.

CAS = ?

Sorry about the questions, just interested to know. Autos are very limited in what you can do to tune them, especially in the R34 where the stock ECU is quite stubborn :(

This is an interesting thread

Security: Lets not mislead people into thinking that 50rwkw gains are achievable through the use of an S-AFC, especially on a car like yours that is virtually stock because they arent - end of story.

The ONLY way that you could find that much more power is if your car was running like absolute shite beforehand. The gain is not soley attritbuted to your S-AFC.

It could also be argued that that power figure looks a tad optimistic for an automatic RB25DET with the mods you have listed.

and just as a direct reply to your post.. 50kw is 50kw.

if the dyno was reading high then it doesnt matter does it?

my base figure would've just been lower also which still doesnt change a 50kw gain.

and ive also said that he played with timing and allowed me to close the gaps on my spark plugs.

tell me another tuner that would allow you to do these things and give the same power output for the same price (it cost me $200)

well Nick, if you read my post properly it says he played with my timing also.

apparently my timing was off to begin with.

he advanced it half way through the tune when it reached around 168kw and it jumped to 184kw.

my point of this thread is that he actually picked this up. not only did he tune my safc, he also fixed my timing problem. its for that reason i thought i had to post this thread... he definately knows his cars.

Great, im really happy for you, but perhaps you didnt read my post. I was making a general statement and hoping you would post your before dyno sheet and or clarify specifics of what hitman fixed up to bring your power up (which you have now done)

Dont get me wrong, its a great gain, but for the 3rd time, i was simply saying it is always a good idea to confirm for everyone what was going wrong before so everyone understands where you made up the 50rwkw so people dont incorrectly assume that if they go and fit an S-AFC they will get these sorts of gains.

Either way, it looks good, and your car should be a different car now :(

any shop will be able to do it considering theyve got a timing light.

I havent seen a shop that doesn't have at least one timing light

Timing on rb25's should be set at 15+or-2 degrees at 650 rpm .

What was your timing set at before ? It can make a lot of difference .If retarded it wont have any power , if advanced to much it may ping ( knock ) and you may blow it up .

I dont doupt the 50 kw increase if your timing was way out , but the power your car is making is fat to optimistic in my opinion . As i said before its an auto and you have the aid of the torque converter and second gear .

A good way to find out the true power that your car is making , take it to wsid and see what your terminal speed is , thats a very good indication of your average power .

im pretty sure my timing was off.

i posted a dyno graph showing the before and after curve.

so just to clarify, i got 147 on 3" turbo back, fmic, pod and 12psi

with retarded timing (i THINK it was sitting a few degrees under stock).

if my timing was spot on then im guessing i would've made around 160kw as my base. but you cant really tell.

also another thing i'd like to add is he said that sometimes the knock sensor on the safc screws with the timing, if the knock is high then somehow it will retard timing so he advised me to disconnect it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...