Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

im pretty sure my timing was off.

i posted a dyno graph showing the before and after curve.

so just to clarify, i got 147 on 3" turbo back, fmic, pod and 12psi

with retarded timing (i THINK it was sitting a few degrees under stock).

if my timing was spot on then im guessing i would've made around 160kw as my base. but you cant really tell.

also another thing i'd like to add is he said that sometimes the knock sensor on the safc screws with the timing, if the knock is high then somehow it will retard timing so he advised me to disconnect it.

My GTS-T (5 Speed) made 160rwkw on the dot with a front mount intercooler, pod filter and turbo back exhaust running 10psi, anymore boost that that and the factory ECU seemed to retard the timing

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

im pretty sure my timing was off.

i posted a dyno graph showing the before and after curve.

so just to clarify, i got 147 on 3" turbo back, fmic, pod and 12psi

with retarded timing (i THINK it was sitting a few degrees under stock).

if my timing was spot on then im guessing i would've made around 160kw as my base. but you cant really tell.

also another thing i'd like to add is he said that sometimes the knock sensor on the safc screws with the timing, if the knock is high then somehow it will retard timing so he advised me to disconnect it.

You mean to say you disconnected the knock sensors ?

My GTS-T (5 Speed) made 160rwkw on the dot with a front mount intercooler, pod filter and turbo back exhaust running 10psi, anymore boost that that and the factory ECU seemed to retard the timing

:P my gts-t r33 s1.5, has got 3" front the dump pipe, boost controler set at 11psi (i set it to 10psi once and it did run alot nicer) pod, and thats about it, and its getting 194.9rwkw :(.. stock intercooler, stock ecu as far as i know.. wots with that? how come so high.

dont get me rong, i dont mind, just wondering if there could be other mods that arnt so ovious that may be helping it get so high.

p.s: on stock boost (7psi) it was at 170rwkw :confused:

:P my gts-t r33 s1.5, has got 3" front the dump pipe, boost controler set at 11psi (i set it to 10psi once and it did run alot nicer) pod, and thats about it, and its getting 194.9rwkw  :(.. stock intercooler, stock ecu as far as i know..  wots with that? how come so high.

dont get me rong, i dont mind, just wondering if there could be other mods that arnt so ovious that may be helping it get so high.

p.s: on stock boost (7psi) it was at 170rwkw :confused:

As I understand it, the power figure I managed (which was taken on C & V's dyno) - was pretty much spot on for an RB25DET with the modifications I had at the time.

Varying dynos give varying results - I dont believe you almost reached 200rwkw from an exhaust system and 11psi, sorry.

Its weid people are posting results at ither 160-165rwkws

or 185-195rwks with the same mods

i must addmit us autos 4 in this thread all push 185rwkws and all in second

i was told my turbo was hiflowed cause i pushed alot of hp but i realy dout it now cause we all push the same

confused james

As I understand it, the power figure I managed (which was taken on C & V's dyno) - was pretty much spot on for an RB25DET with the modifications I had at the time.

Varying dynos give varying results - I dont believe you almost reached 200rwkw from an exhaust system and 11psi, sorry.

yeh i was i was a bit like, woh ok.. im just wonding if there has been other mods in the engine that i cant see (im not a car wiz so i only know from what ive picked up here)..

got it done at UAS in castlehill.. they do alot with skylines and 300's, so id wana think the dyno was pritty close for thouse type of cars

red line on low (7psi), blue on high (11psi)

post-22516-1133495754.jpg

Blitz is 100% correct. Not possible to get 50rwkw with a air fuel controller. If that figure was with a power FC i would believe it not with SAFC.

By the way i like your intercooler setup, looks great!

like I said, his base timing must have been way off.

Look at the original graph. Power curve looks like something a 3 year old would draw. I've only ever seen graphs like that with severely retarded base timing.

Does it matter what gear the dyno tune was done in... I'm asking as the tune for my car was done in 3rd (tiptronic), just wondering if doing it in 2nd would've made a difference.

I've been reading with interest too. I'm getting dyno tuned tomorrow with a Jaycar DFA (works the same as SAFC)

I'll definately ask the tuner to check my ignition timing. Excuse my ignorance but is this a quick easy to do (adjust timing) because I only booked in for an hour.

I got similar mods - 3" exhaust, pod, 10psi, stock intercooler - chugs fuel

I've been reading with interest too. I'm getting dyno tuned tomorrow with a Jaycar DFA (works the same as SAFC)

I'll definately ask the tuner to check my ignition timing. Excuse my ignorance but is this a quick easy to do (adjust timing) because I only booked in for an hour.

I got similar mods - 3" exhaust, pod, 10psi, stock intercooler - chugs fuel

5 Minute job

how can you guys argue with whats written on paper?

and i keep saying he didnt only tune my safc!

Your totally right.

Heres a dyno result from an R33 GTR in essentially stock form - I know it might seem a little high, but how could you argue with it? After all, the owner has it on paper

33dyno.jpg

so what you're saying is ive completely fabricated the dyno?

thats f**king stupid.

you're making accusations you cant back up.

Edited by SECUR1TY

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...