Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  Blitz said:
It could also be argued that that power figure looks a tad optimistic for an automatic RB25DET with the mods you have listed.

I thought my graph was optimistic until I saw this thread.

dyno.JPG

3 inch turbo back (stock cat)

FMIC

EBC

Pod

on Auto R33 GTS-T

It gave me 190+ (192 I think) but timing was all out so the setting on the EBC was put back a tad.

I'm contemplating a SAFC2 and I hope it will give me 195+.

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  Blitz said:
This is an interesting thread

Security: Lets not mislead people into thinking that 50rwkw gains are achievable through the use of an S-AFC, especially on a car like yours that is virtually stock because they arent - end of story.

The ONLY way that you could find that much more power is if your car was running like absolute shite beforehand. The gain is not soley attritbuted to your S-AFC.

It could also be argued that that power figure looks a tad optimistic for an automatic RB25DET with the mods you have listed.

I'm thinking that his base timing was way off. Majorly retarded.

That's where the gains were had, I'm guessing.

Can someone explain how the timing or "base timing" as mentioned above can be changed? Last tune, only the SAFC was touched, nothing about timing at all - just wondering if this would help me squeeze past 200rwkw (only out by 5.4rwkw at the mo.)

  satanic said:
Can someone explain how the timing or "base timing" as mentioned above can be changed?  Last tune, only the SAFC was touched, nothing about timing at all - just wondering if this would help me squeeze past 200rwkw (only out by 5.4rwkw at the mo.)

I think the only way to do it properly is a replacement or piggyback ECU.

  satanic said:
Can someone explain how the timing or "base timing" as mentioned above can be changed?  Last tune, only the SAFC was touched, nothing about timing at all - just wondering if this would help me squeeze past 200rwkw (only out by 5.4rwkw at the mo.)

Base timing can be checked with a timing light.

It is adjusted by turning the CAS.

hmmmm picture's would help ay...

I have 255rwhp in an auto and you cant compare it to a manual

and 50rwkws could be gain if it was running like shit on 92 oct

and serviced air leaks fixxed 98oct and a border line good tune close to blow up

sit am wondering the psi run

turbo mabe hiflowed

james

well Nick, if you read my post properly it says he played with my timing also.

apparently my timing was off to begin with.

he advanced it half way through the tune when it reached around 168kw and it jumped to 184kw.

my point of this thread is that he actually picked this up. not only did he tune my safc, he also fixed my timing problem. its for that reason i thought i had to post this thread... he definately knows his cars.

CAS = ?

Sorry about the questions, just interested to know. Autos are very limited in what you can do to tune them, especially in the R34 where the stock ECU is quite stubborn :(

  Blitz said:
This is an interesting thread

Security: Lets not mislead people into thinking that 50rwkw gains are achievable through the use of an S-AFC, especially on a car like yours that is virtually stock because they arent - end of story.

The ONLY way that you could find that much more power is if your car was running like absolute shite beforehand. The gain is not soley attritbuted to your S-AFC.

It could also be argued that that power figure looks a tad optimistic for an automatic RB25DET with the mods you have listed.

and just as a direct reply to your post.. 50kw is 50kw.

if the dyno was reading high then it doesnt matter does it?

my base figure would've just been lower also which still doesnt change a 50kw gain.

and ive also said that he played with timing and allowed me to close the gaps on my spark plugs.

tell me another tuner that would allow you to do these things and give the same power output for the same price (it cost me $200)

  SECUR1TY said:
well Nick, if you read my post properly it says he played with my timing also.

apparently my timing was off to begin with.

he advanced it half way through the tune when it reached around 168kw and it jumped to 184kw.

my point of this thread is that he actually picked this up. not only did he tune my safc, he also fixed my timing problem. its for that reason i thought i had to post this thread... he definately knows his cars.

Great, im really happy for you, but perhaps you didnt read my post. I was making a general statement and hoping you would post your before dyno sheet and or clarify specifics of what hitman fixed up to bring your power up (which you have now done)

Dont get me wrong, its a great gain, but for the 3rd time, i was simply saying it is always a good idea to confirm for everyone what was going wrong before so everyone understands where you made up the 50rwkw so people dont incorrectly assume that if they go and fit an S-AFC they will get these sorts of gains.

Either way, it looks good, and your car should be a different car now :(

  SECUR1TY said:
any shop will be able to do it considering theyve got a timing light.

I havent seen a shop that doesn't have at least one timing light

Timing on rb25's should be set at 15+or-2 degrees at 650 rpm .

What was your timing set at before ? It can make a lot of difference .If retarded it wont have any power , if advanced to much it may ping ( knock ) and you may blow it up .

I dont doupt the 50 kw increase if your timing was way out , but the power your car is making is fat to optimistic in my opinion . As i said before its an auto and you have the aid of the torque converter and second gear .

A good way to find out the true power that your car is making , take it to wsid and see what your terminal speed is , thats a very good indication of your average power .

im pretty sure my timing was off.

i posted a dyno graph showing the before and after curve.

so just to clarify, i got 147 on 3" turbo back, fmic, pod and 12psi

with retarded timing (i THINK it was sitting a few degrees under stock).

if my timing was spot on then im guessing i would've made around 160kw as my base. but you cant really tell.

also another thing i'd like to add is he said that sometimes the knock sensor on the safc screws with the timing, if the knock is high then somehow it will retard timing so he advised me to disconnect it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • With stone chips, you really can't just try to fill them. You really have to sand that spot to lower the edges of the chip, so that the filler will end up covering a wider patch than just the chip. Otherwise, you're trying to have a sharp edged paint surface match up to some filler, and they just do not sand the same and you always end up with a noticable transition. A bunch of adjacent chips should be well sanded back, to round off all those edges, and use a lot (in a relative sense) of filler to raise the whole area back.
    • To expand on this to help understanding... The bigger/longer the block is, the more it's going to work to sit on your far away high areas, and not touch the low stuff in the middle. When you throw the guide coat, and give it a quick go with a big block, guide coat will disappear in the high spots. If those high spots are in the correct position where the panel should be, stop sanding, and fill the low spots. However, using a small block, you "fall off" one of the high spots, and now your sanding the "side of the hill". Your little block would have been great for the stone chips, where you only use a very small amount of filler, so you're sanding and area let's say the size of a 5/10cent piece, with something that is 75*150. For the big panel, go bigger!   And now I'll go back to my "body work sucks, it takes too much patience, and I don't have it" PS, I thought your picture with coloured circles was an ultra sound... That's after my brain thought you were trying to make a dick and balls drawing...
    • Oh I probably didn't speak enough about the small sanding block for blocking large areas.  In the video about 3 minutes in, he talks about creating valleys in the panel. This is the issue with using a small sanding block for a large area, it's way too easy to create the valleys he is talking about. With a large block its much easier to create a nice flat surface.  Hard to explain but in practice you'll notice the difference straight away using the large block. 
    • Yep I guessed as much. You'll find life much easier with a large block something like this -  https://wholesalepaint.com.au/products/dura-block-long-hook-loop-sanding-block-100-eva-rubber-af4437 This is a good demo video of something like this in use -    You have turned your small rock chip holes into large low spots. You'll need to fill and block these low spots.  It's always a little hard not seeing it in person, but yes I would go ahead and lay filler over the whole area. Have a good look at the video I linked, it's a very good example of all the things you're doing. They went to bare metal, they are using guide coat, they are doing a skim coat with the filler and blocking it back. If what you're doing doesn't look like what they are doing, that's a big hint for you  
×
×
  • Create New...