Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

stock cams and afms is pretty good going for that kind of power. I was assuming maybe nismo afms mounted to the stock airbox, with maybe some 272/10mm or thereabouts cams in there :)

Mik actually ended up sticking with the 2.6.

I think money is a big factor in a build like this.

Actually Mik, i made 305awkw on crd's dyno, but at something like 19/19.5 psi, which i didnt think to be safe on a stock car. And we made 315rwkw on bel's dyno with what i reckon to be another 15-20rwkw to gain (hopefully).

This car sounds absolutely awesome. Particularly on the dyno when it starts spooling. The power curve picks up ridiculously after about 4-4500 rpm

stock cams and afms is pretty good going for that kind of power. I was assuming maybe nismo afms mounted to the stock airbox, with maybe some 272/10mm or thereabouts cams in there :)

Nope Nismo AFMs and the stock airbox. I don't think it would have this much mid range with wild cams like that.

Who told you that ? I think i should know whats in this engine , i helped Mick assemble it and put it in the car !

Just another interesting point. The guy we use to do cranks checked my new jap crank fro starightness befiore I used it. He said it is the straightest new crank he has ever seen out of the box. He said that most yankee cranks ( mostly v8s) usuallly have a couple of thou runout.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...ic=97771&st=0

What crank is it?

are you going to tell us how much boost was used for the run?

I don't think he wants to tell the truth as to what specs or boost its running

The thread is just so we can all say WOW look at your power and how your turbos aren't to laggy when its probably not even RB26 stroke anymore I say close the thread its a bunch of crap

It's a forged semi counter 73.7mm Jap crank of unknown origin.

well you did say in the 3 litre thread

"The guy we use to do cranks checked my new jap crank fro starightness befiore I used it. He said it is the straightest new crank he has ever seen out of the box."

well what did it say on the box....my bet is it would have came in the same box as the rods and the pistons.....im with bu5ter on this one....why the smoke and mirrors?

wait wait I forgot its got a stock airbox aswell oh WOW your amazing, forged crank and what ever else but lets just talk about the airbox so it makes you look even better

Whatever mate...When did I talk about the airbox??

And I don't answer to capitals.

For anyone else that want to know...boost on that run was 1.45bar.

well you did say in the 3 litre thread

"The guy we use to do cranks checked my new jap crank fro starightness befiore I used it. He said it is the straightest new crank he has ever seen out of the box."

well what did it say on the box....my bet is it would have came in the same box as the rods and the pistons.....im with bu5ter on this one....why the smoke and mirrors?

haha...there is nothing on the box...do you want to see it? Your welcome to drive down to sydney and take a look.

And the pistons and rods definately came in a seperate box.

so whats the deal here? Mik, people obviously think your are telling furfies, why would you want to post your results then lose credibilty for appearing like your not telling it as it is?

My opinion is that the setup is making full boost far shy of 5000rpm, which would be some feat given other 2.6's with GTRS's make full boost (1.3bar for eg) at at least 5100, 5200.

id love SK to drop his views, as once he has a look at the graphs and does his maths, all will be revealed!! :D

dont get me wrong, not trying to bag your credibility, just would like to see all the facts.

Edited by SLY33
so whats the deal here? Mik, people obviously think your are telling furfies, why would you want to post your results then lose credibilty for appearing like your not telling it as it is?

My opinion is that the setup is making full boost far shy of 5000rpm, which would be some feat given other 2.6's with GTRS's make full boost (1.3bar for eg) at at least 5100, 5200.

id love SK to drop his views, as once he has a look at the graphs and does his maths, all will be revealed!! :D

dont get me wrong, not trying to bag your credibility, just would like to see all the facts.

My old set up (bog stock, tired 86mm bore engine) and GTRS turbines made 1.4 kgcm^2 boost at about 4750RPM.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...