Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I just want to know from you guys if you have been seriously stuffed around with your warranty.

I purchased a warranty cover with my car when I bought it as many of us possibly have.

IM NOT ASKING FOR COMPANY NAMES OR FOR A SLANGING AGAINST THEM!

But lets just say, I would believe that my warranty in question would be one of the main players in Australia.

Ever needed my car towed, not problem but when it comes to repairs or to be repaid for repairs, the fun begins. Im not talking about the usual stuffing around here.

I've heard from mates and mates of mates some real aggravating stories.

Just want to know your experiences...

I don't want this thread closed before it is even started so please don't name names.

Edited by 32brother
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/97950-important-have-you-or-not/
Share on other sites

I havent been seriously stuffed but I bought my car from the main dealer for that vehicle and was sold with a 2 year or 160K warranty. When something did go in the form of both my remote key fobs, something I assumed would be covered under a "full" warranty, it wasnt.

I was billed $50 for each key for the privelige as apparently they had become scrambled at a petrol station (which could happen at anytime). They did knock it down to $50 for both after I made a fuss.

Problem in my case was sales guys chasing a sale, service trying to survive. I also asked for a booklet when I had this problem as to what was and wasnt covered which the service guy gave me immediately. This never eventuated from the sales guy who was in the office next door.

This was for a vehicle that I would deem a luxury marque which made me more annoyed.

Not sure if you have the equivilant of the citizens advice bureau here but that was who I have sought advice from in the UK.

When i bought my car it came with warranty. Stupid thing was that they had to service it all the time. I found this out later so i payed for 3 years warranty which gives me jack shit. Good thing is that the mechanic there knows me and everytime i have problems he fixes my car without any charge.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...