Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys

Below are pics of the latest incarnation of the Blitz ER34 D1 SPL drift sedan. Well engine bay shots......

What are you thoughts on this particular setup ?

Its a Blitz K5-700R (they went one size up this time) on a custom high mount manifold and E56 wastegate.

I personally think that there would be way too much heat generated by the turbo and the return pipe is too close to it. Even with all the insulation dont think it will help much......

It seems they ditched the previous RB26 front facing manifold

ie this one

r3446lb.jpg

I would imagine that a company such as Blitz and nomukens own company URAS would have enough money and resources to get the best possible parts to acheive the best results.....But I cant for the life of me see how having the return pipe so close to the turbo could be "better" than the previous setup with the forward facing plenum.

This is not another thread to start the argument of standard plenum vs forward facing.....just want peoples opinions on this setup and possible answer some of my "issues" I have with it as stated above.

gallery2farticles2fblitz5fr342.jpg

Close up

gallery2farticles2fblitz5fr343.jpg

PS

Can someone tell me how to modify the topic heading ?

I noticed I made a typo...should be YOUR instead YOU.

Edited by shonen
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/98784-what-are-you-thoughts-on-this-setup/
Share on other sites

i'd imagine having a proper sponsor they have a fairly hefty budget and spent the least possible to get the best throttle resposne (being a drift car) so they spent a few $$$ and shortened the pipework as much as possible. think how it would go if you plumbed the turbo outlet directly into the plenum (no cooler and pipework)

the heat wouldnt be that much of an issue.

there is a thick deflector plate as you can see.

The amount of heat you think is being transferred, really isnt being at all.

Its also heat wrapped, which again, is going to stop a lot of radiant heat even reaching the piping.

It's too late and I am too tired to do the exact calculations. From memory the air in a 75 mm pipe would be travelling at around 800 kph at 7,000 rpm. At that speed it ain't gunna pick up any heat from the pipework.

:P cheers :O

It's too late and I am too tired to do the exact calculations.  From memory the air in a 75 mm pipe would be travelling at around 800 kph at 7,000 rpm.  At that speed it ain't gunna pick up any heat from the pipework.

:O cheers :O

:P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah the rule of thumb with an LS is 7psi per 1000rpm. That is decidedly not enough at 6800rpm. I mainly looked for the scenarios where knock started to be picked up and it was later in the session when things were hotter, and oil was thinner, and the pressure was lower than it should be. (i.e very horrible). I am hoping with thicker oil (I was running Penrite ten tenths 10-40, the manual specifies 10-30) that does not leak that it's much improved at that time!!! I am using Project Mu Club Racer CR pads. I'm also using the Project Mu 335C fluid. The symptoms imply that it was fluid that boiled, but no bubbles seemed pretty weird to me when I bled it today. I want to try Castrol SRF as it has a much higher wet temp but, well, I have new Project Mu fluid lol... so I should at least use that. The pedal on track was really noticable. It went from basically normal feeling to instantly near-floor. The car did pull up as before, it was just very much nearly at the floor before the brakes engaged. At that point I pretty much decided the day was very done, it did *kinda* come back during that very slow cooldown lap into the pits. Felt perfectly fine driving home.
    • f**king around with the bro
    • Ludenham   44.2 tops day no issues  
    • Then today, I went to visit a man with an r33 hat Peter and Road and Race sorted the alignment. As it is being set up for general track/hillclimbs etc it has a heap of caster (7o), less camber than I am used to (1o front and 2o rear, as the caster looks after that in turns without the braking downsides), 3mm front toe out and 0 toe rear. Will see how that goes and track tyre wear to see if it does need more camber, but adjsustment is also limited with nismo arms and adjustable bushes at only 1 end. It does have a bent inner tie rod on the driver's side front but as it came up within spec I'll just leave that as is. So, that is getting close to my chapter of this story....could of tidy ups then a shakedown in early October before it finds a new home.
    • So, it went to Unigroup for a run in and tune on Friday, everything went (generally) well. In terms of fixes, the engine was good and there were no leaks. It needed plugs (I hadn't checked them because the coil pack cover was on a new engine and I couldn't imagine they weren't new.....but turns out the temporary plugs to just keep it sealed up were in there.....new plugs gapped to 0.8 and it was fine from there. Also, there was a little preload on the clutch slave which caused some slip. I haven't had the box off so I don't know what the clutch looks like; my guess it is brand new and the pedal had not been adjusted....backed that off a bit and it held fine. Last thing will have Dose crying....the idle especially when cold is a bit difficult between the cams, forward plenum, atmo blow off valve and an 80s air management system. It is fine when hot but a little uneven when cold, will see if I can sort or at least improve that one cold morning. Other than that, tuning went fine. It made 245 but was pulled back to 227 which 2 opportunities to improve in future. 1. The factory CAS is not great and was jumping around at high RPM, so Mark took 2 degrees out up top (that is why it stops making power and lost 20kw). Very safe this way and the extra power is available but will require a more modern ECU and better cam (or even better crank) sensor 2. The 2871 in factory housings is very big for a low mount, and the internal wastegate is too small, so it was creeping from mid range all the way to redline....the duty cycle on the boost controller is turned down a little for safety. That is much harder to fix, it would need a large external gate and that would require a whole bunch of other changes, so it will go as it is for now. It feels nice and healthy and safe, so should be good for about a billion laps like this.
×
×
  • Create New...