Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Its still the original RB20 gearbox, 180,000kms old. I have run 3 clutches, std, UAS GTR single plate clutch and now an Xtreme single plate clutch. The UAS was better.

roy,

seeing as though you're the RB20/Trust TD06 guru :)

just curious to know, what are your thoughts on how the Trust TD06-25G will perform on an internally standard RB20DET?

cheers.

Id say its too big. But i suppose if you shove an 8cm housing on it, and you can live with nothing under 5,000rpm then it would do the job at the drags. Two friends in particular still rate the TD06-25G as the animal setup on RB25s

yeah, i thought so. it would definitely be more suited to an RB25 or a nice RB24.

Roy, how's yours for cruising with the TD06-20G?

Edited by RS500

I drive it every day, (well i did up until August this year) so im use to it. Better if someone like R32Big_boy, Scotsman, Doughboy Chris32, Bl4ck32 etc answered (if they bother reading Rb20 threads :P)

as they have all had bum in seat time.

Its a nice little thing. If you like punchy power and response it sux. If you are thinking about what you are doing and keeping it in the correct gear, its a good match. Just dont expect to stomp it in 3rd at 60km/h and go anywhere very quickly as the thin only has 110rwkws or thereabouts. But if your doing 95km/h in 3rd the thing has over 200rwkws (from memory)

Actually since you used the term cruising id say its excellent. I can sit on the freeway and get 9.1L/100km, and drive smoothly along without filter and BOVs makign lots of noise ramping onto boost. It makes for a nice street car, just not a very quick one.

I dont think too many clutches will have troublw holding the power a TD06-20G will make on an RB20. That said mine when it got a bit hot at the drags did tend to slip a little, but its fine on the circuit so im happy. If it slips then its helping my gearbox live.

It seems the secret to helping the RB20 box live is not to over clutch it and to keep good fluid up to it

Driving up to 20km/h in 1st gear then grabbing 2nd and florring it, i get no wheelspin in 2nd as it ramps onto boost. Shirting into 3rd at full noise etc, traction is perfect. I run RE55s, and to be honest i dont know how well the 18" Falkens hook up on the street as i havent really given it any stick.

The R32 chassis with reasonable tyres wont have too much probelm with 230rwkws.

I drive it every day, (well i did up until August this year) so im use to it. Better if someone like R32Big_boy, Scotsman, Doughboy Chris32, Bl4ck32 etc answered (if they bother reading Rb20 threads :P)

as they have all had bum in seat time.

Its a nice little thing. If you like punchy power and response it sux. If you are thinking about what you are doing and keeping it in the correct gear, its a good match. Just dont expect to stomp it in 3rd at 60km/h and go anywhere very quickly as the thin only has 110rwkws or thereabouts. But if your doing 95km/h in 3rd the thing has over 200rwkws (from memory)

Actually since you used the term cruising id say its excellent. I can sit on the freeway and get 9.1L/100km, and drive smoothly along without filter and BOVs makign lots of noise ramping onto boost. It makes for a nice street car, just not a very quick one.

thanks for the info roy.

given that i drive a sierra cosworth rs500 almost as an every day car, i am used to having lag and it not being so punchy in the lower rpm range, so that won't be a problem for me, although as i am looking at buying an r32 gts-t as an every day car and potential track warrior later on, i'd like to go for a setup that will be better than what i have now with my cossie.

i actually like how u mention u can cruise on the fwy with low fuel usage, as i'm looking for it to be quite economical when the power is not needed.

im slowly setting my car up to drift...just trying to get the motor upto it....and i dont care about lag with drifting...cos most of the time your on full boost anyway....but if it could start to break traction in 2nd that would be nice cos it would make it easy to slip it out sidewards

and i dont care about lag with drifting

?

um. Sorry, but, like, you have so totally got to do some research.

you need control to drift. unless you just want to hang the end out from time to time.

then again, what would I know?

i know where your coming from...as i have drifted a few cars they dont have much lag if any at all...but i dont mind lag...you control your drift with throttle control....and use a bit of brakes at the same time....drifting is better when your at full noise and the tires a screaming out smoke....most people prefer to drift and have no lag...but im the opposite

?

um. Sorry, but, like, you have so totally got to do some research.

you need control to drift. unless you just want to hang the end out from time to time.

then again, what would I know?

dude have u seen what turbos all the top cars run? Most of the top cars D1 cars run 450ps plus which mean td06-20 at a minimum. The ppg gearbox car and the d1 garage s14 and a number of other cars in the aus series all run highmount turbos. Its quite easy out on a race track to keep the engine on boost as most of the time you are in the powerband (if not change down! :D) or you can always kick the clutch :)

If you are serious about using this setup for drift, i would recommend you try and suss yourself out a nice manifold. Whilst plenty of ppl say that the std manifold is good for plenty of power, the fact that Nissan gave the RB20DET-R a neat manifold, and i think whilst there are better setups then mine, the synergy of turbo, manifold and gate work well together. I suspect you wont get the same resutls using the std manifold.

The D1 cars with the larger turbos in the 450-550hp range all use manifolds and gates, which again reinforces that the synergy of all the parts help the setup shine

TD06_Plot.jpg

The above plot is my turbo with the 8cm vs 10cm housing, but since you have cams etc, it will be interesting to see how it goes. The setup is dramatically improved with the right housing

One thing with using the std manifold is that you wont have to go crazy with heat shielding, you will still have to pay attention to shielding for dump pipe etc, but as you can see in the below pic, the manifold exposes a lot of engine bay parts to high temps.

462After_Engine_Pic.jpg

hmm thats a pretty nice setup...the diferance between the 8cm and 10cm is pretty big...im also gettin a custom made plenum to go on with this aswell...im also thinking of ordering a 3 bolt 8cm exhuast housing like yours instead of using the t3 internal gate housing because the internal gate doesnt look like it would work very well...as it looks like it would cause alot of turbulence....if i go with the 3 bolt external gate housing i will get one of those OBX turbo manifolds from the states cos they are cheaper than greddy.....wat external gate are you using roy?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Here's a boring history lesson on number plates People want illegal spacing to make their plate more readable, if mine was J2X BK, anyone who knows about the car would see that its spelling JZX. Years ago third party plate manufacturers could alter the text to make it look like something else, nowadays the computer software is locks that ability (well, ours does at work) Up until 2001 the first letter of a number plate represented the year of the vehicle, for example A would be 1983. (pre 1983, the format was backwards, so the year letter was on the end). Followed by 3 random numbers and 3 random letters. Things started to get complicated at the end of the 90s where T and V were 1999, W and X were 2000 and Y was early 2001. From 2001 they introduced a new 'layout' where the first two characters are letters, this represented where that vehicle was first registered in the country. The letters corrosponded to a region in the country. Some regions had a large number of codes, where as some only had a couple (despite being large in physical land size) Next are 2 numbers to indicate 2000s. So it went from: Y (March 1999 > Aug 2000) 51 (Sept 2001 > Feb 2002) 02 (March 2002 > Aug 2002) 52 (Sept 2002 > Feb 2003) etc etc When the 2010s got here, the numbers changed again, going up by tens 10 (March 2010 > Aug 2010) 60 (Sept 2010 > Feb 2011) When the 2020s arrived it went to 20 (March 2020 > Aug 2020) 70 (Sept 2020 > Feb 2021) etc As for personalised plates, you're not allowed a registration that makes the vehicle look newer. Take my 110 for example, its a 2004 car so I can have any available plate upto 04. I can't have a 54 because it was manufactured in August 2004. Which allows me to have a J plate, because its older (if that makes sense)    
    • Mount some of these on your dash? https://www.greddy.com/products/16001720  
    • Given you're running a 2.8 and my 2.5 is not really like for like, I suspect there could be a bit more timing you could give it. What is the kW yield per degree you're putting through it? Here's my E85 map to give you an idea, where it was I could still get another 3~4kW per degree thrown at it.  
    • It turns out that Setrab make a fan specifically for the oil cooler which is great and I've installed it with minimal swearing. I removed my 2x 12in push fans from the front of my aircon condenser and wired them into this. My main thermo fans kick on when I use the aircon anyway and would effectively already be working as puller fans through the condensor which is infront of the rad. The push fans (understandably) didn't really do much in the config they were previously in so now they're out. Now we're on to the "Oil fan doesn't really do much either!". Yes I'll duct it next if it does nothing in heavy use which it shouldn't. But hey, the object exists and fits great and is cool. Let me have this. The car is still in the "do my fittings leak oil now? do my wheels actually rub?" phase. I did a spirited drive on them and didn't hear or feel anything. Then I got back home and noticed there were grind marks on the inside of the rims, though I couldn't see where they were touching I got out the grinder and attacked the suspects. Note: I do not know how to use a grinder. Then I realised I had dragged my new rims across my concrete driveway before I did this drive. I didn't think I had damage at that time when I briefly looked...... but remembered this occurred after I did all the angle grinding. The grinding on the wheels in some very specific spots. It's not around the whole rim for example, which lines up with dragging it across concrete more than hitting a suspension component for even 1 full rotation. So everything is currently painted and taped up and I need to test it some more to see if it really IS rubbing, but from inside the car it doesn't feel like it is. In other news I attempted to do a before and after comparison of the heads/cam upgrade thing. Dynos lie, everything is in different measurements. Here is the data from the sandown back straight. Car go faster than before. Vroom vroom.
    • Here's my base ignition. +3 correction to redline when shooting water/meth which is always on. Looking at my old ignition table, I should be able to add 1-2 degree's next time I'm on the dyno.  Let me know your thoughts. 
×
×
  • Create New...