Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Gester, I had Dunlop FM901's on my last car and found them really predictable and stable when sliding in the dry. They weren't that great in the wet though, but still remained predictable. For the performance, the cost was quite reasonable. However they are quite soft; almost an intermediate compound so will wear quite quickly. Oh, and they were MOTOR's top tyre last year.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9907-best-tyres-to-get/#findComment-153969
Share on other sites

I love my Falken Ziex tyres. Dunno what they cost on there own as I got 'em with a tyre & wheel package from Tempe Tyres Sydney.

GoodYear Eagle F1s are pretty awesome but if you have wide wheels you can't get 'em. The F1s are great in the dry but they are awesome in the wet!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9907-best-tyres-to-get/#findComment-154252
Share on other sites

Simex for the rear baby yeah!

I do mid 13's all day on just 205's .

however I don't reccomend anything this small, they are still 205's after all, they are just really good for such little tyres.

BTW, don't put them on the front as the sidewalls are spongy and give a little too much radial roll. For the back thats ok, offsets the stupid hicas a little. For the front something that will point the car positively is the go.

Simex are fine wet or dry BTW.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9907-best-tyres-to-get/#findComment-154481
Share on other sites

From memory there was an article in Motor or Wheels magazine in a recent edition. It was either 1 or 2 months ago.

Anyway, I think the top rated performance tyre based on wet and dry driving was the Pirelli, followed by the Bridgestone and Goodyear. A respectable 6th out of about 16 tyres was the Hankook. It came it at around half the price of the top brand and were behind the Yokohama and Dunlop.

All the tyres were 235/45/17.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9907-best-tyres-to-get/#findComment-154650
Share on other sites

Best tyres will depend on many factors, such as budget, driving conditions etc. I like the Toyo TPG's, they are by far the best tyre I've ever used. Type R tyres are great for racing, but useless in the wet and don't last long.

See'ya:burnout:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9907-best-tyres-to-get/#findComment-154685
Share on other sites

The Toyo's came out somewhere in the bottom 4 I think and Simex was either last or second last.

I was thinking of getting the Hankooks Venturis as I had them quoted for $199 each (the article quoted $175). They are a better wet weather tyre as a pose to dry, but the main selling point was the quality for an affordable price.

Also, in addition to having very good grip, the tread life is about twice that of the Bridgestone G Grid (approx 17000km). I was planning to get these originally.

Falken was a notable omission from the tests. I don't know why.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9907-best-tyres-to-get/#findComment-154913
Share on other sites

Kichigai,

Your only talking about the cheap brands, the TPG's are expensive and are much better. Simex are crap, but of the cheap lot then they are OK.

It really depands on what the budget is. Most tyre manufacturers make a range of tyres, from crap to good, so you can't compare them. $175 is a cheap tyre, I generally spend $300+ each, on new tyres .

See'ya:burnout:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9907-best-tyres-to-get/#findComment-154919
Share on other sites

Paul,

The article compared all major tyre manufacturers. As I mentioned earlier, the Hankooks came to about half the price of the name branded tyres e.g. Bridgestones $364 each, Pirelli ard $400 from memory.

I agree with what you're saying, its just that the article was basically a "Bang for your bucks" style comparison. It tested wet & dry handling, braking and value for money. So for ppl that are wanting the performance factor but want to save a little money the article is relevant.

Hope that helps.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9907-best-tyres-to-get/#findComment-154937
Share on other sites

Kichigai,

I haven't read the article so I can't really comment on that, but from my own experience, I would never choose the cheap manufacturers like Hankook or Nangkang. Bang for your buck maybe, but for a performance vehicle they just don't stack up. I've tried about 5 different brands of tyres and the Toyo TPG's are the best I've tried, both in the wet and dry.

See'ya:burnout:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9907-best-tyres-to-get/#findComment-154945
Share on other sites

A little off topic, but I did the ring around today for a pair of tyres. I'll be getting the 901's again (fronts this time).

And the bloke said that the FM901's are being replaced by a LM382 (or something like that). The strange thing is this bloke quoted me $278 for a 901 and $237 for a LM382. I wonder if this means the LM382 are going to be a crappier tyre???

After a few phone calls I found the 901's at $220 each - much better :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9907-best-tyres-to-get/#findComment-155317
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Im using continental contact conti sports on the front and change betwee jokies dna gp and brigestone re540s on the back. never had any problem with any of these tyres. I prefer to have a softer tyre on the front than on the back. Just my 2c

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9907-best-tyres-to-get/#findComment-287357
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Originally posted by Jay95R33

The 239 is a good price no-a-days.

I say grab'm  :O

Last week i got some new quotes for these Dunlop FM901's.

From a Dunlop dealer they were $200ea + fitting.

From Beaurepairs they were $269ea fitted.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9907-best-tyres-to-get/#findComment-371437
Share on other sites

ahhh im going crazy with all these choices. Ask 10 people and get 5 different answers, ask another 10 people and get another 5 different answers.

So far to date i have quotes on:

(225/50/16)

Bridgestone G3 = $220ea

Bridgeston ER50 = $270ea

Dunlop FM901 = $269ea

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9907-best-tyres-to-get/#findComment-373200
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...