Jump to content
SAU Community

Neo Cams


Huzqld
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

Just after some opinions on how these cams would go. They have confirmed 444BB Will suit NEO with vct.

My setup is

RB30, Neo head with springs and ti retainers

Forged bottom end, etc etc

Gt35

Wanting to keep the VCT for a bit more response, car is Auto and will be street/Drag

Wanting to make around 500rwhp on 98 if possible

post-78438-0-51060800-1413714779_thumb.png

Edited by Huzqld
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just make sure that the supplier is aware that Neo is not hydraulic lifter......

Apart from that, they don't seem much different from various of the Jap cams. You could use more lift and less duration, but given that it's an auto drag car what they have on there probably won't hurt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

especially because the RB30 is basically a longer stroked RB25, lift is more important to increase than duration.

So if this car is a daily driver it might be worth looking into some lower duration/higher lift option.

however that combination is more harsh on the rest of the valvetrain and is potentially trickier to fit.

If it's just a weekender then don't worry those cams will be awesome on boost.

If you desire response over top end power the factory cams are a great option. especially in the Neo as they have a bit more lift than the 33 cams anyway.

glad to hear you're keeping VCT though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO the whole point of having plain buckets is to allow the use of more aggressive lift ramp on the cams . The idea being beater breathing through the valve opening further rather than longer . Longer period or duration cams IMO are better suited to engines turning higher revs all the time and may not play nice even in an RB30 around town .

I think cams need to be chosen with CR in mind and the inlet manifold/throttles style too . Single throttle inlets will make longer cammed engines grumpy because of the pressure fluctuations in the common plenum chamber , not as bad with ITBs because the throttle plates tend to block the reversions .

Your call but as mentioned less duration even at the same valve lift would be easier to live with .

A .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been looking at some setting on the alarms for the Q60 and what buttons do and so and also been looking for details on the alarm in my V37 which is a standard issue with the car. settings like window roll up and a few others seem to not work at all. i cant seem to find exact info on V37 alarms so Q60 is all i can really go off i have not tried 400Z alarm settings or info yet so that will be next. any one got like a sheet of info on the alarm system in the V37 as all my documents are in japanese but i thought the system would basically be like standard through similar models? 
    • I had a fuel smell coming from the drivers rear and pulled the tank out to inspect where it was coming from, turns out the breather hose from the tank to the filler neck was perished. I’m going to Japan next week and I’ll grab it while I’m there  pulled the oil tank apart and started cleaning this crap out of it, some brake cleaner and rags got it looking new again 
    • Hmm. Was quite a few years ago now. I think I bought from a crowd in the US called CDT Audio. The speaker is the HD-6. The HD-6CF would have been the better option (based on T-S parameters), but they were discontinued in 4 ohm at that point in time. The HD-6 is a better driver in almost every other way (than the CF) - just not as good in IB. They still do the HD-6. They might even have a more suitable (for IB) option here.https://www.cdtaudio.com/cdtnew22/products/components/woofers/midwoofers/midwoofers.htm But, here's the rub. I was working in the US a lot back then, so I got them delivered to my US office and then just brought them back to OZ myself. I don't know if they will ship to OZ, and it probably wouldn't be great cost-wise anyway. As to results. They're driven direct off the rear channels of my headunit, because the headunit can be setup to run the rears as subs. So, not a lot of power being fed there. Nevertheless, there's no shortage of volume - the sub levels don't need or want to be boosted at all. The bass is definitely not what you would call "tight". It is definitely a bit delayed compared to a proper sub. But, with the great front soundstage and really good 6.5" woofers in the front doors, I'm getting most of the bass detail from the front and the rear is really only to extend the bottom end a bit. Works for what I'm doing. I mean - until recently you couldn't really hold a conversation in my car due to the fuel pump, and for many years I had tyres so noisy (Kumho KU36 at <50 tread depth) that I had to drive with earplugs anyway!
    • curious to know what drivers you chose and the results? quik mafs, says two 6.5s should roughly equate somewhere between a single 8" or 10" driver. i agree that IB is definitely the way to go in most cars imo.
    • S13 and R32 rear suspension geometry is horrible once you lower it (which everyone does). The camber & toe out ramp is very aggressive, hence it's common for the S13 boys/girls to use a S14 or S15 subframe as the geometry is light years ahead. I'm sure the same can be done on R32s, but I don't know anyone that has done that.
×
×
  • Create New...