Piggaz

Maybe they had a price rise? - The twin gates for starters - The fab work for the twin gates. Less if you want screamers, more if you want to plumb them in. It's a time consuming job. - The braided lines to each gate. You can go as basic or as hard as you want here. Single 3 port or duel 4 port MAC valves. The lines are not cheap!

1.05. Let her exhale! Costs a tad more to setup compared to the IWG/0.92 though.

What is it going on?

If you look really close, almost looks exactly the same as this... bit pricey though...

5 sets of cam setups? What are you chasing to warrant 5 different setups? You could have had a EFR setup with change.

Hit up MTQ. I got Nismo 3.2ish's 8374/1.05 for a tad over $3k, delivered. That was in January. It was 1 of 2 I could find in the country at the time. No one had stock.

I'd have to ask Scott, Simon. Haven't really asked to be honest. Pete did a back to back between a 6266/0.84 to a 8374/1.05 but the car was pretty ill when it arrived. Having driven that car in both setups, the 8374 belts it for the stuff you can't see on the dyno. Your assume the 6266 with its 0.84 ass end would be stronger down low, that is most definately not the case, let alone the transient stuff. If his car was anything to go off, the PTE needed 28 psi to make 460 kw and the EFR needed 21 psi to make 457. *Different dynos though. A 9180 blows about 550 kw on that dyno for example before it taps out due to speed. A Gen 2 3582R, PTE 6266 and a 8374 comparison would be awesome. But the fab work involved makes it a very expensive exercise.

Can always count on you, Pete for a confidence boost ?.

No I don't know 25 psi will equal 127K. It was an educated guess... I could be well off. We will know because the speed sensor will be going back to the ecu. Hopefully the wheel doesn't end up out the back of the exhaust. You're bloody crazy to turn it up that much without knowing what it's spinning at. Not the turbo's fault it if fails.

Because of turbine speed. 127k max. If it reaches that, the turbo is done, irrespective of pressure. Its no secret that these things have certain parameters to keep within, just like any mechanical part. What speed are you at with your 30 or 32 psi?

You gonna lay down a figure?

It would have been a 2.2 if I was placing bets. Just goes to show that a larger engine doesn't give more power if the same snail is used.

Those heads flow like weapons!!!!! It also may have had the 1.45 ass end being a track car. BW need to hurry up and release the 8474 ???

Apparently 480 AWKW was the most power out of a 8374 awkw (out of an Evo) Scott has seen on his dyno. Nick (3.0/8374) went 461, 24 psi Pete (3.2/vcam/8374) went 457awkw, 25 psi tapering back to 21 psi (120,000 turbine speed). I don't know. It's all dictated by that magic 127,000 RPM turbine speed. What will be more interesting will be the boost level that it'll need to get there. Going off the -5 setup, it went 441 at 19 psi. Realistically, I should have just left it there. Boost level I'm gonna peg at no more then 25 psi, tapering back down.

And when yours wasn't running, I could have wandered out the back, pushed the boat out and rip skidz too. Your car was off the road for a similar time wasn't it? ? The car was pulled off the road running. I could have whacked a stock box in it, replace the turbo and it would have running within a couple weeks.

Throwing rocks in a glass house ain't ya? How many times did your engine come in and out and drove a total of a couple kms? 5 I think it was. . This all started from the rear turbo packing in. 2-3 weeks and all good.

Wiring guy was away. It all starts Wednesday. Bit of a list ?.

Just Jap.

I got mine from Greenline I'm pretty sure.

No idea mate. Maybe one of the JEM boys on here may have more details?

Mine swings 50 degrees and I modified the cam from 8.7 mm of lift to 10.25mm. It won't fit. You need step 1 for a stock donk.

Would mean a rebuild for you.

Proof it's leaving Grim's shores and onto Insights dry dock!

Goes in today