Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just fitted a temp gauge with a sensor mounted next to the pod filter, driving at night, stopping at lights it reached a max temp of 65.5 degrees, hate to think what temps i'd get being stuck in traffic in midday :D

CAI is now priority one :)

Anyone get similar temps???

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/100147-the-problem-with-pod-filters/
Share on other sites

theirs an easy solution to this, make up an alluminium shroud and place it just behind ur front bar, dont block off the radiator if u can and then run some ducting from the shroud to the front of ur pod. or perhaps just case the pod off because it sounds like ur getting heat soak

A CAI isn't much good if your pod isn't heat shielded.

While a CAI might help drop inlet temperatures once you've picked up speed, it won't do much in stop-start traffic and you'll still get some heat soak.

I've used one of those laser spot temp things, and after a fair weather session at Wakefield there's been a 15-20 degree differential between the engine side of my heat shield, and the metal ring on my pod.

This is what my setup looks like:

20041221_cai_03.jpg

(The other side of the flex pipe is in the front air dam, so its directly in the airflow)

However, around town there's not much in it. While I haven't measured it properly, touching the heat shield and the pod's ring doesn't bring up a noticable difference when I get home after going to the shops.

Edited by scathing

Isaac, if you still have your Airbox, Cut a hole in the side of that for the Piping from your Pod to the Turbo, and Stick some heat proof shield stuff on the inside if you can. That may help with the heat issue. But yeh as intensevil said, it sounds like heat soak.

If you are that worried about it just swap your pod back to the factory airbox. I swapped my HKS Pod filter for a factory airbox with K&N Panel filter and couldn't notice any change at all (and neither could a dyno).

The other good thing about a factory box is that it's perfectly legal unlike an open pod filter.

Yeah i treat shielding as part of CAI, so gunna do both and measure the results.

Still have the stock airbox but no snorkel, so it pretty much would still be gulping hot hot air (remember the airbox inlet is on the engine side aswell).

It doesnt help much that my turbo doesn't have a heat shield too, might get one of those turbo bags..

i just got made up a heat shield from aluminium from bunnings covered the engine side and the top of the filter, and with the old hole from the stock cooler i ran some flexy tube stuff fromt that hole to the meshed vent in my front bar.

ben...

the temperature of the pod filter itself and air intake will be different to the temp of the air being sucked into it. of course being in the engine bay the air will be much hotter than ambient air but if your temp probe is attached to the pod filter or intake piping etc then it will be showing the surface temp rater than the air temp.

the temperature of the pod filter itself and air intake will be different to the temp of the air being sucked into it. of course being in the engine bay the air will be much hotter than ambient air but if your temp probe is attached to the pod filter or intake piping etc then it will be showing the surface temp rater than the air temp.

Temp sensor is mounted in the surrounding space of the pod filter, not attached to anything bar a long cable tie used to 'hold' the sensor in the airstream about 3cm back from the probe, its at least 3cm from the pod itself and probably at least 10cm from anything metal (piping, engine bay etc..) so reading is as accurate as i could make it..

i hope you didnt move your AFM with it...

If you did, therefore changing the amount of air between the AFM and intake, then your computer is reading the wrong thing that the AFM is tellin it.

cheers

nah mate, the AFM its an air flow metering device, it only measures air when its flowing through it, so it doesnt matter if you have it closer or further away from the throttle body as its still measureing the same amount of air.

hope this clears this up

after putting a POD on my car, i noticed it was smooth/quicker reving at HIGH revs, but low down is really really bad and slow... i want to go back to the factory box.

and i think a factory box with a high flow panel is perfectly good untill you start making some real high hp

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The values for HID colour are also defined ~ see https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2006L02732/latest/text  ~ goto section 3.9 onwards ....
    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...