Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Gee they all this makes them sound like a real good turbo!!! lol

Laggy, weird design, china born.......im beginning to think they might be worth the little money you pay for them!!

THERE IS NO DUMP FOR THE Wastegate flap like Garret and EVERY OTHHER BLOODY TURBO.

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...71_452203_1.htm

you mean like this one? It's also a fairly common arangement on hitachi, mitsubishi, and as a result trust internal gate turbos from the mid 80's to the mid 90's aswell. The v band arrangement isn't uncommon either.

You're talking about a turbo that is obviously old tech (at least the core) but it makes it's claimed power apparently and it costs bugger all. It doesn't mean i want to go out and buy one as i think you would be better off getting something a little easier to install (read common t3 exhaust arangement) and so save some money there that can then be spent on the turbo itself.

What i do like about these turbo's is they are obviously aimed at the performance enthusiast on a budget, the same as the china intercoolers and the china manifolds and the china radiators and the china coilovers, they offer 3 versions to suit your application, they have warranty, and they offer install if you can't do it yourself (which means warranty support).

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...71_452203_1.htm

you mean like this one? It's also a fairly common arangement on hitachi, mitsubishi, and as a result trust internal gate turbos from the mid 80's to the mid 90's aswell. The v band arrangement isn't uncommon either.

You're talking about a turbo that is obviously old tech (at least the core) but it makes it's claimed power apparently and it costs bugger all. It doesn't mean i want to go out and buy one as i think you would be better off getting something a little easier to install (read common t3 exhaust arangement) and so save some money there that can then be spent on the turbo itself.

What i do like about these turbo's is they are obviously aimed at the performance enthusiast on a budget, the same as the china intercoolers and the china manifolds and the china radiators and the china coilovers, they offer 3 versions to suit your application, they have warranty, and they offer install if you can't do it yourself (which means warranty support).

well

similar exhaust outlet for the wastegate flaap.

end of story these turbos are for ricers who just want a "turbo car"

NOT A TUNED PERFORMANCE CAR! ( as the japs say)

POS TURBO!

so are you gonna keep bagging something without fact?

no one post has any.

That design wouldnt be so bad as its cleanly split, not like other int gate turbos that are close to the turbine outlet

so are you gonna keep bagging something without fact?

no one post has any.

That design wouldnt be so bad as its cleanly split, not like other int gate turbos that are close to the turbine outlet

nismoid.. i have facts

in my own brain from experience

ive tuned 5 cars with these turbos.. customers like them.. nice big top end power after 5000rpm till redline *usualy 8,000rpm* but they suck for street racing!

period!

drag only or watever

Edited by s13rb26

here is a lag diagram

a7t08.jpg

on a ca18det

kkr 330(smaller one)

full boost between 3000-3500 not bad for a ca18 if you ask me.. good midrange as well

other mods it has is a z32 airflow meter and gtr injectors

Edited by fatz

Yeh i agree thats not too bad acutally. Seen as i would be looking at using it on an RB20 i would be looking at the smaller version, i.e. not the 480, i think its the 440?

And guys theres no need to argue, were all friends right?

......right :)

nismoid.. i have facts

in my own brain from experience

ive tuned 5 cars with these turbos.. customers like them.. nice big top end power after 5000rpm till redline *usualy 8,000rpm* but they suck for street racing!

period!

drag only or watever

are these the 480 on 2Ltr or 2.5Ltr motors?

If it gives me 250rwkw and full boost by 4000rpm I don't care where it was made...

my mat ehad one on his S14.. and yes IT IS LAGGY.... started boosting at 5000rpm..

Personally i liek RESPONSE@!!!

1.1 ex housing on an SR is going to be laggy, no matter what brand turbo. On an RB25 it may respond differently..

Getting back onto the original topic - does anyone have a dyno printout or experience with one of these turbos on an RB25?

1.1 ex housing on an SR is going to be laggy, no matter what brand turbo. On an RB25 it may respond differently..

Getting back onto the original topic - does anyone have a dyno printout or experience with one of these turbos on an RB25?

thats the baby kkr330

totaly shit turbo once again........

will pop in no time

thats the baby kkr330

totaly shit turbo once again........

will pop in no time

been on for about a month

anyone who puts the 1.1 on small capacity engine is asking for lag

im frends with the distributor so i can get a 10% discount fo a limited time

i think he has sold over 40 units in 4 months and hasnt had one return under warrenty

pete

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I was using the wiring diagram I have So 12.74V is coming into the rear Fuel Pump relay as I measured.  When I turn the key to ON im getting 0.6V to the Fuel Pump plug; which i assume is backfeed voltage and doesnt include the 12V from ignition power.  The rear relay is working and being triggered.  From the diagram I clearly see the rear relay 80 = Rear Relay going into the Body/H loom (R-27) 27 = Fuel Pump plug going into the Body/H loom (T-20) 40 = Short Connector (R-27) I'm reading 12.74V on the blue/black wire which is the power for the Fuel Pump   From this diagram I can see the Ignition relay goes into the front and up to the ignition  2 = Fuel Pump Relay <1M> (R-27) 37 = ING Relay <1M> I started from the pump using this reference Which the way I read it (referencing Nissan wiring color codes) is: Pin Wire Color Function 1 B/P (Black/Pink) Ground 2 L/W (Blue/White)        ECU Trigger 3 SB (Sky Blue) Fuel Pump 5 L/B (Blue/Black) 12V Constant Tested SB to SB on Fuel Pump for continuity - confirmed Tested negative on Fuel Pump to 12V battery and L/B - confirmed 12V Pulled the relay putting 12V between Pin 1 & 2 and testing continuity on Pin 3 & 4 - confirmed relay   So that has me looking at this part of the circuit to understand whats happening here...and im still confused. From best I can tell; the disconnect is back to my previous diagram; between Ignition Relay and Fuel Pump Relay...which yet again; afaik is where the immobiliser should.    Thats what I was trying to explain to GTSboy; im not trying to fix it myself; yet I seem to have to get a Masters in Electrical Engineering (while im busy doing my actual job of DevOps & Cloud Engineering) somehow.  I just wanted more expert opinions; or more so that what I tested is correct and proves it to something around that area; to go back to the alarm tech (for a 3rd time) that he needs to fix it. He keeps telling me its not the alarm. He lives on the complete other side of the city so i understand not wanting to make a trip but as I said before if its the alarm it should be up to him to fix it. But he's adament its not; even though I pointed out the FP was immobilised through the original alarm. To my mind; it seems that the ECU is sending the signal; but the ignition is not getting 12V down the line.       
    • Maybe also really stiffly sprung track cars. Get the inside wheel up in a corner and all the fun stops. Also me sometimes (rarely) when I have to stand on the brake to convince the diff to drive the wheel that is still on the ground when I'm trying to diagonally get over severe driveway entrance, etc.
    • I feel like I'm missing something. You had an authorised installer come out and install a new alarm. Post install the car doesn't start, and you aren't getting the installer back to fix what they did wrong?
    • So either way it is gearbox out and look what is wrong?  I know about the input shaft bearing. Even before swap/new clutch the it sounded exactly like this: So is that inout shaft bearing or the other was installed backwards?  And can some please tell me the part number for that input shaft bearing? The gearbox is small box from R34 N/A and number is FS5W71C. Thank you  
    • I am yet to see anyone ever regret a quaife or helical. ...other than drifting/skidpan duties. I kind of want to upgrade my factory helical with a Quaife (but really it's not ultimately that different, and is a MASSIVE UNDERTAKING), that's how good the hype is about them, that I want to try them 'just to see'  
×
×
  • Create New...